The Supreme Court yesterday ruled that the re-election of President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) was valid, dismissing one of two lawsuits by pan-blue-camp lawyers claiming that Chen and Lu were unfairly elected.
The Taiwan High Court ruled against the pan-blue camp's election lawsuit last November. The decision was then appealed to the Supreme Court. Yesterday's verdict cannot be appealed.
"The court rejects the plaintiff's three claims because the pan-blue camp has failed to provide adequate evidence for any of the arguments presented to the court," Judge Shih Chao-hsiung (許朝雄) said.
TAIPEI TIMES POOL PHOTO
The judge said pan-blue-camp claims that the pan-green camp had attempted to influence or manipulate the result of the presidential election by staging an assassination attempt on March 19, the eve of the election, were not backed up by any evidence.
He also referred to pan-blue-camp claims that two Kaohsiung-based underground radio stations had reported that Chen and Lu had been the victims of a conspiracy by the pan-blue camp and the Chinese Communist Party.
But he said that there was no evidence to show that Chen and Lu had ordered the stations to do this.
The judge said pan-blue lawyers had also claimed Chen and Lu avoided the public after the shooting in order to win more voter sympathy. But he said that the matter had no bearing on the law relating to presidential elections.
Shih said the pan-blue-camp lawyers had contended that Chen and Lu had staged the assassination attempt, then launched a so-called "national security mechanism" to influence the election.
The lawyers claimed that military and police personnel, allegedly mostly pan-blue supporters, were thus deprived of the ability to vote.
But Shih said the increased security measures implemented by the Ministry of National Defense were lawful. In addition to this, he said, no evidence had been presented to the court showing that Chen had ordered the activation of a "national security mechanism."
On the allegation that Chen used the referendum on the day of the presidential election to unfairly influence the result of the election itself, the court said that Chen had never required the Cabinet to hold the referendum concurrently with the election, and that it had just been a suggestion.
He said the Central Election Commission decided to hold the referendum with the presidential election. The court therefore could not conclude that Chen had tried to influence the election.
Also see story:
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS