The People First Party (PFP) said yesterday it plans to request a constitutional interpretation from the Council of Grand Justices soon to look into the legitimacy of the election, while trouble brewed within its ranks.
"The results of the May 14 election does not change the PFP's role and significance as the third largest party in the legislature. To take this election as an evaluation of the PFP's direction would be a mistake. The party's legislative caucus will soon request a constitutional interpretation. We cannot allow the constitutional reforms to be recklessly passed in a situation where 23 percent of the people are confused or that merely reflects party mobilization," PFP caucus whip Lee Yung-ping (李永萍) said at the PFP's headquarters yesterday morning.
Determined
The PFP yesterday held a press conference presided over by PFP Vice Chairman Chang Chao-hsiung (張昭雄) to explain the party's position on its dismal showing in the National Assembly election on Saturday and voice their determination to contest its legitimacy.
On Saturday, the PFP fell far short of its aim of winning 40 seats in the 300-seat National Assembly and secured only 18 seats. Given that only 23 percent of the total voting population came out to cast their ballots, however, Chang said yesterday that the election's legitimacy was doubtful.
"In the May 14 election, 77 percent of the population did not come out and vote, meaning that 77 percent of the population are not satisfied with any of the parties or any politicians [in Taiwan]. All politicians and parties need to reflect on this," Chang said, adding that the PFP also believed that, given the low turnout, the election more reflected each individual party's ability to mobilize voters than party popularity.
Rumors
Despite the PFP's claims, rumors circulated yesterday that a number of party legislators might be planning to either defect or form their own party. These included legislators Lee Ching-hua (
Responding to the rumors, Chang said that while the PFP will not deviate from its positions on cross-strait peace, reconciliation and the need to end political bickering, the party will obviously have to make some adjustments. However, Chang said, if there are people who differ from the party on its stated direction or have concerns about the election, the party will have no choice but to part ways with them.
Premier Frank Hsieh (
Hsieh made the remarks after the legislative caucus of the PFP said it plans to ask the Council of Grand Justices to judge whether the election's 23.36 percent turnout makes it binding.
In a democratic election, Hsieh pointed out, abstaining from the vote is also a voter choice. Therefore, the premier said, the National Assembly electoral outcome is not legally disputable.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS