Chinese President Hu Jintao (
In the second meeting this month between a Taiwanese opposition leader and Hu in his capacity as Chinese Communist Party (CCP) chairman, Soong and Hu met for an hour yesterday in Beijing.
Speaking at a press conference held directly after the talks, the PFP announced the six points of the communique forged in the meeting.
In the first point, the two parties agreed on the importance of resuming cross-strait negotiations on the basis of the "1992 consensus," and specifically detailed the supposed origin and content of the consensus, as formed in the 1992 talks between the Chinese Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) and the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) of Taiwan.
The "1992 consensus" refers to an alleged agreement between negotiators from ARATS and SEF to hold talks under the mutual agreement of the "one China" principle, but with different interpretations of what that meant.
While the pan-blue camp has claimed that the consensus should serve as the basis for talks between Taiwan and China, the current administration has consistently said that it does not recognize the "1992 consensus," since it was never formally stated or agreed upon.
The communique added a new term in parentheses -- "two sides of the strait, one China" -- next to the words "1992 consensus," which the statement said highlighted the specific oral descriptions by the SEF and ARATS in their agreement, which it said was later dubbed the "1992 consensus."
"Equal, cross-strait negotiations should be swiftly resumed on the `one China' principle with individual interpretations described above [referring to the oral descriptions attributed to SEF and ARATS] to pragmatically solve important issues of common concern for both sides of the strait through mutual respect and co-existence," PFP policy research center director Chang Hsien-yao (
Second, the parties agreed on their common opposition to Taiwan's independence and common plan to pursue peaceful stabilization in the Taiwan Strait. While saying that Taiwan's independence movement is damaging to the stability and safety of the Taiwan Strait and the Asian region, the two parties then called on "Taiwan's current leader" -- presumably a reference to President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) -- to fulfill his promises, reiterated during a meeting between Chen and Soong, including the "four noes," and to promise not to amend the Constitution.
"Only if there is no possibility that Taiwan is heading toward independence, can there be the effective avoidance of military conflict in the Taiwan Strait," the statement said.
Third, the parties agreed to end the standoff between the two sides of the Strait, and to facilitate the establishment of cross-strait peace mechanisms, including establishing a peace agreement and a mechanism to address military affairs between the countries on either side of the Strait.
Fourth, the statement called for the strengthening of business exchanges between China and Taiwan and the establishment of a system to facilitate economic cooperation. Such economic cooperation, the PFP said, should include facilitating the establishment of cross-strait flights by next year and the establishment of a free trade area for Taiwan and China.
Additional economic proposals in the communique included creating equal tuition standards for Taiwanese students studying in China, the establishment of Chinese scholarships for such students, the facilitation of entry and exit into China by Taiwanese citizens and the simplification of visa regulations, and various proposals to simplify agricultural co-operation.
Fifth, the PFP and the CCP agreed to seek a resolution of the problems facing Taiwanese participation in international organizations, specifically in regards to Taiwan's entry into the World Health Organization (WHO).
Sixth, the two agreed to facilitate the establishment of a forum for experts and leaders of both sides of the Strait.
In order to facilitate all of the communique's points, Soong said at the PFP's press conference, the CCP and the PFP further plan to establish a communication platform between the parties to continue discussing the realization of their common goals.
Given previous rumors that Soong would seek to redefine the controversial "1992 consensus" in his meeting with Hu, and that he would bring Hu a message from Chen, the first and second points of the communique were the focus of media attention yesterday.
"This is the first time that China has said clearly in a communique that it supports the `one China' principle with different interpretations," Soong said, further emphasizing the use of the newly-coined term "two sides of the Strait, one China" in the communique.
The interdependence of Taiwan and China is greater than most imagine, Soong said, stressing the importance of resuming talks under the intended meaning of the "1992 consensus."
The PFP has always hoped to solve problems and helped to stabilize the Taiwan Strait through sincere communication, mutual respect and a common desire for mutual benefit, Soong said.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or