Nepal's King Gyanendra yesterday lifted a state of emergency he imposed after seizing power in February, apparently bowing to strong international pressure to restore civil liberties.
"His Majesty, in accordance with the Constitution, has lifted the order of the state of emergency," a brief palace statement said.
Although Nepal's Constitution provides for emergency rule for up to three months -- a period set to expire on Sunday -- the king was widely expected to decree its extension. Even with the end of the emergency, however, the king continues to rule the country directly, without an elected government or parliament.
Gyanendra imposed the draconian measures on Feb. 1. after firing the government, taking absolute power and suspending civil liberties in a move widely condemned both within Nepal and internationally.
The palace announcement came after the king's return on Friday from visits to China, Indonesia and Singapore, where leaders pressed him to restore democracy in Nepal.
Gyanendra met several leaders on the sidelines of an African-Asian Summit in Indonesia last week, including Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and UN Secretary General Kofi Annan.
The meeting with Singh was crucial, because India -- a key source of arms for Nepal's fight against a communist insurgency -- suspended aid to Nepal after Gyanendra's power grab.
On Thursday, Annan said he wanted to see "a return to constitutional rule as soon as possible," adding that during a meeting with Gyanendra, "I made this clear to the king."
Since the royalist takeover, hundreds of politicians have been jailed and protests against the king and his royal government have been banned.
Several arrests of key politicians, including former Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba, have been carried out under the direction of the Royal Commission on Corruption Control, formed after the king's taking over.
In a separate statement issued yesterday, the palace said the commission's authority would be extended despite the end of emergency rule.
Constitutional expert Harihar Dahal said the withdrawal of the state of emergency -- which is based in Nepal's Constitution -- would automatically restore all other suspended civil liberties.
Political parties that have organized widespread street protests against the king welcomed the announcement, but remained skeptical that it would restore all democratic rights.
"There is a lot more the king has to do, like free political leaders and lift all restrictions, before we can say emergency rule has been totally lifted," said Mahesh Acharya of the Nepali Congress party.
Minendra Rijal of the Nepali Congress Democratic party said he feared the king could still pursue opponents using other legal provisions such as anti-terrorism laws, public security acts and anti-corruption laws.
Most people on the streets too said it was too early to begin celebrating.
"We have to wait and watch the situation. Just because the emergency is ended, it does not mean the king will let go of his power and stop all restrictions," said Ramesh Ghirmire, a school teacher.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or