The US hit out at China's newly-adopted "anti-secession" law Monday, describing it as an "unfortunate" and "unhelpful" action that could increase tensions.
The legislation, adopted earlier in the day by China's rubber-stamp National People's Congress, "does not serve the purpose of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait," said White House press secretary Scott McClellan.
Responding to the law's authorizing the use of "non-peaceful means" against Taiwan, McClellan said: "We oppose any attempts to determine the future of Taiwan by anything other than peaceful means."
PHOTO: GEORGE TSORNG, TAIPEI TIMES
"We don't want to see any unilateral attempts that would increase tensions in this region. So this is not helpful," he said.
McClellan also repeated that the administration does not support Taiwan's independence.
The anti-secession law is certain to come up during Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's trip to Asia this week, which will include a stop in Beijing later in the week.
"We will be, I am sure, talking about Taiwan during the course of the trip," State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said.
"Our view remains that they need to move in the direction of peaceful dialogue. She will encourage them to do that, and look forward to hearing from them as to how they might be willing to move in that direction," and what they might be willing to do, he said.
On the eve of her trip, Rice criticized the law, saying "it raises tensions, and it's not necessary or a good thing to raise tensions."
In an interview on Sunday morning television, Rice described the US as "an upright anchor in this dispute for a long time."
"The key is that there should be no effort on either side to unilaterally change the status quo," she said, adding that it is "far too early to make conclusions" about whether the law invalidates the long-standing assumption that as China becomes more prosperous, it will become more peaceful.
Meanwhile, the Republican congressional leadership apparently is still resisting pressure to pass a resolution condemning the anti-secession law. An agenda for this week's floor activity in the House, where such resolutions usually get their first airing, contains no provision for debating or voting on either of two resolutions introduced by House members last month urging the Bush administration to strongly oppose the anti-secession law.
As the administration voiced its concerns over the new Chinese law Monday, the State Department also cautioned the Chen administration from taking potentially incendiary countermeasures.
"We have urged both sides to avoid any steps that raise tensions. We have encouraged both sides to avoid any steps to try to define unilaterally some kind of solution to their differences," Boucher said.
But he declined to answer directly a question about the planned March 26 demonstrations against the law or any other action Chen might take.
"I don't have any particular view of a demonstration or a counter-reaction, as hypothetical as it is right now," he said.
"The issues between Taiwan and [China] need to be solved in dialogue. Neither side is going to get anywhere with unilateral steps," he reiterated.
Boucher could not say whether the passage of the law will have an impact on US efforts to convince the EU not to go through with its plans to lift its arms embargo on China.
But he said that the prospect of a Chinese attack on Taiwan "should be disserving to the Europeans as it is to us."
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or