In response to yesterday's release of new details on China's "anti-secession" law, Premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) said that if China passes a law that poses an immediate danger to Taiwan and includes Taiwan in its territory, he would support amending the Constitution to counter the proposed legislation.
But Hsieh said the government would abide by the Constitution before any amendment is made and that the Executive Yuan would not itself move to revise the Constitution.
"The government has no reason to oppose [adverse] reaction to China's planned legislation because China will be held responsible for the consequences," he said.
PHOTO: LIAO CHENG-HUI, TAIPEI TIMES
An explanation yesterday of the draft law by Wang Zhaoguo (王兆國), vice-chairman of the National People's Congress (NPC) Standing Committee, provided a first glimpse of the bill's contents since it was first proposed in December. It is almost certain that the bill will be passed on Monday.
While the draft law's text has yet to be revealed in full, Wang made clear yesterday that Beijing reserved the right to implement "non-peaceful" means to resolve the cross-strait stalemate.
"Let us be absolutely clear that safeguarding sovereignty and territorial integrity is the core interest of our country ... We have never forsworn the use of force. No sovereign state can tolerate secession and every sovereign state has the right to use necessary means to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity," Wang said yesterday, according to the state mouthpiece, the People's Daily.
Wang stressed however that "so long as there is a glimmer of hope for peaceful reunification, we will exert our utmost to make it happen."
No details
Wang failed to list the circumstances that could result in the use of force, saying only that "non-peaceful means and other necessary measures" would be used "in the event that the `Taiwan independence' forces should act under any name or by any means to cause the fact of Taiwan's secession from China, or that major incidents entailing Taiwan's secession from China should occur, or that possibilities for a peaceful reunification should be completely exhausted."
Wang said the law would authorize the State Council and the Central Military Commission to decide on and then implement "non-peaceful means and other necessary measures, and promptly report to the Standing Committee of the NPC," the People's Daily said.
Wang's careful choice of words was noteworthy. He distinguished between "Taiwanese compatriots" and "Taiwanese independence forces," and repeatedly referred to "non-peaceful means and other necessary measures," avoiding direct references to military action.
"It needs to be stressed here that should the `Taiwan independence' forces insist on going their own way and leave us with no other option but to employ non-peaceful means and other necessary measures, such means and measures would be completely targeted against the `Taiwan independence' forces rather [than] in any way against our Taiwan compatriots," Wang said.
Beijing also offered an explanation of the "status quo," saying the cross-strait situation was a remnant of the civil war and that the problem was a domestic one.
"The Taiwan question is one that is left over from China's civil war of the late 1940s. Solving the Taiwan question and achieving China's complete reunification is China's internal affair. On this question, we will not submit to any interference by outside forces," Wang said.
Taiwanese officials lodged strong protests against the legislation, calling the proposed "anti-secession" law a "blank check for the military."
Rejection
The Mainland Affairs Council rejected Beijing's description of the "status quo," however, countering with its own description.
"The status quo across the Taiwan Strait is this: The Republic of China is a sovereign and independent country, and neither side of the Strait falls under the jurisdiction of the other," it said. "Taiwan is not a part of the People's Republic of China ... this is unacceptable," council Vice Chairman Chiu Tai-san (邱太三) told reporters yesterday.
"China admits that this bill will affect not only Taiwan, but also any foreigners residing in Taiwan as well," Chiu said, repeating the council's warning that the bill would destabilize the region.
Asked whether the government planned to take any concrete measures to counter Beijing's legislation, Chiu appealed to the international community for support.
"We have already lobbied the international community several times ... if China should implement measures that are unacceptable to the international community, then I think it will take moves to oppose China," he said.
The council rejected renewed requests from Beijing for Taiwan to accept the "one country, two systems" model, saying it was "illusory and degrading."
In Beijing, Wang said the law would ensure "the two sides may consult and negotiate on officially ending the state of hostility between the two sides, mapping out the development of cross-[strait] relations, steps and arrangements for a peaceful reunification, the political status of the Taiwan authorities, the Taiwan region's room for international operations that are compatible with its status."
The council responded by saying that efforts at improving cross-strait exchange and dialogue in the past five years would be obliterated.
Vice President Annette Lu (
She urged the world to denounce China's actions and pressure it against enacting the law.
"Resolving disputes peacefully is a norm that the international community has adopted in the 21st century," Lu said, before attending the DPP's central standing committee yesterday.
"Any non-peaceful act that attempts to resolve a dispute violates international law and international norms," Lu said.
Japanese government spokesman Hiroyuki Hosoda said yesterday that Tokyo was concerned about China's "anti-secession" legislation.
"We do have concerns about the possibility that it will affect cross-strait relations," Hosoda told a press conference in Tokyo.
His comment followed objections on Sunday by Chinese Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing (
"Japan and the United States both want a peaceful resolution and we only reaffirmed that," Koizumi said.
The US stance on the legislation is that it will not be beneficial to cross-strait stability, said Victor Chin (
Government officials have exchanged opinions with their US counterparts on the legislation since late January and have expressed their concern about the eventual impact of the law on stability and peace in the Taiwan Strait and in the Asia-Pacific region, Chin said at a news conference.
Chin noted that both the US spokesman and other officials have expressed their views on the legislation from different angles, adding that Washington has said it is unnecessary for Beijing to enact such a law.
Additional reporting by Ko Shu-ling and Jewel Huang
CLASH OF WORDS: While China’s foreign minister insisted the US play a constructive role with China, Rubio stressed Washington’s commitment to its allies in the region The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday affirmed and welcomed US Secretary of State Marco Rubio statements expressing the US’ “serious concern over China’s coercive actions against Taiwan” and aggressive behavior in the South China Sea, in a telephone call with his Chinese counterpart. The ministry in a news release yesterday also said that the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs had stated many fallacies about Taiwan in the call. “We solemnly emphasize again that our country and the People’s Republic of China are not subordinate to each other, and it has been an objective fact for a long time, as well as
‘CHARM OFFENSIVE’: Beijing has been sending senior Chinese officials to Okinawa as part of efforts to influence public opinion against the US, the ‘Telegraph’ reported Beijing is believed to be sowing divisions in Japan’s Okinawa Prefecture to better facilitate an invasion of Taiwan, British newspaper the Telegraph reported on Saturday. Less than 750km from Taiwan, Okinawa hosts nearly 30,000 US troops who would likely “play a pivotal role should Beijing order the invasion of Taiwan,” it wrote. To prevent US intervention in an invasion, China is carrying out a “silent invasion” of Okinawa by stoking the flames of discontent among locals toward the US presence in the prefecture, it said. Beijing is also allegedly funding separatists in the region, including Chosuke Yara, the head of the Ryukyu Independence
GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY: Taiwan must capitalize on the shock waves DeepSeek has sent through US markets to show it is a tech partner of Washington, a researcher said China’s reported breakthrough in artificial intelligence (AI) would prompt the US to seek a stronger alliance with Taiwan and Japan to secure its technological superiority, a Taiwanese researcher said yesterday. The launch of low-cost AI model DeepSeek (深度求索) on Monday sent US tech stocks tumbling, with chipmaker Nvidia Corp losing 16 percent of its value and the NASDAQ falling 612.46 points, or 3.07 percent, to close at 19,341.84 points. On the same day, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange Semiconductor Sector index dropped 488.7 points, or 9.15 percent, to close at 4,853.24 points. The launch of the Chinese chatbot proves that a competitor can
‘VERY SHALLOW’: The center of Saturday’s quake in Tainan’s Dongshan District hit at a depth of 7.7km, while yesterday’s in Nansai was at a depth of 8.1km, the CWA said Two magnitude 5.7 earthquakes that struck on Saturday night and yesterday morning were aftershocks triggered by a magnitude 6.4 quake on Tuesday last week, a seismologist said, adding that the epicenters of the aftershocks are moving westward. Saturday and yesterday’s earthquakes occurred as people were preparing for the Lunar New Year holiday this week. As of 10am yesterday, the Central Weather Administration (CWA) recorded 110 aftershocks from last week’s main earthquake, including six magnitude 5 to 6 quakes and 32 magnitude 4 to 5 tremors. Seventy-one of the earthquakes were smaller than magnitude 4. Thirty-one of the aftershocks were felt nationwide, while 79
RSS