The Taipei Administrative High Court ruled against the Taipei City Government yesterday in a lawsuit challenging the central government's request that it repay its health insurance subsidy debts. The court ruled that the city must pay its health and labor insurance subsidy debts totalling approximately NT$20.8 billion, but the city government is allowed to appeal the ruling within 20 days of the verdict.
The Taipei City Government was sued by the Cabinet's Bureau of National Health Insurance (中央健保局) and Bureau of Labor Insurance (勞工保險局) for not paying its health insurance subsidy debts of NT$10.8 billion, for the period of 1999 to 2002, and NT$10 billion for the periods of 1992 to 1995 and November 2000 to January 2003.
The health and labor insurance bureaus filed the administrative lawsuit against the city after it agreed only to pay the insurance of those people from the city of Taipei, and not those people who have moved to the city and are insured through employers.
Yesterday's verdict gives the green light for both bureaus to have the proper authorities enforce the ruling if the city refuses to pay the money it owes -- regardless an appeal outcome.
"By law, although the defendant [Taipei City Government] is allowed to file an appeal within 20 days, the plaintiffs [the bureaus] are authorized to ask for the enforcement of the verdict to get the money back no matter if an appeal is filed or not," said Chang Chung-wen (張瓊文), spokeswoman for the Taipei Administrative High Court.
The case has been lingering for more than two years. Taipei City Government argued that the central government should pay for health insurance subsidies on their own instead of asking local governments to contribute, a request the city says is against the Constitution. The central government then filed an application to the Council of Grand Justices and asked for an interpretation on the issue.
According to the city, the central government's request violated a local government's right of financial independence.
On Oct. 4, 2002, the grand justices also ruled that the Taipei City Government must pay its debts to the bureaus.
Interpretation Article 550 to the Constitution ruled that the central government's request was both legal and reasonable. As a result, the city's argument that the central government was violating a local governments' rights to financial independence was rendered moot.
In addition, the grand justices ruled that both the central government and the city must cooperate on the issue and reach some sort of agreement , since health insurance is the right of every citizen.
According to Article 27 of the National Health Insurance Law (全民健保法), local governments must pay the health insurance subsidies for all residents of a city.
Also see stories:
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS