China's proposed anti-secession law will establish a special court for handling cases of "separatist activity," while officials on both sides of the Taiwan Strait would be held to account if they do not act appropriately in opposing Taiwanese independence, Mainland Affairs Council Chairman Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) said yesterday.
Wu said he had not seen a draft of the law, but sources which he refused to name had passed on to him the "fundamental principles that [China] have to follow in enacting the law."
PHOTO: SEAN CHAO, TAIPEI TIMES
Wu said the bill would prohibit "secessionist activity" and stipulate punishment for offenders.
"[It will] define the status of Taiwan as ... a holy and inseparable part of the People's Republic of China," he said.
Wu said that offenders would be tried in a special court, and that Chinese government officials whose performance in curbing Taiwanese independence was found to be unsatisfactory, either by commission or omission, would also be legally responsible.
"[If] Taiwan's administration or military sectors do something that leads to war between the two sides, they will be charged with this kind of crime as well," he said.
Wu said the proposed law would give China license to define what constituted separatist activity and whether it was a crime.
"This will have serious implications and it's going to rock ... cross-strait relations," Wu said.
"I think in order to make sure what this crime is about they have to define what Taiwan independence is and ... the current definition of Taiwanese independence is quite broad," he said.
"Anything other than unification is going to be defined as independence and therefore anybody who speaks out in support of the Taiwan government might be charged with this kind of crime," he said.
"[Taipei] Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Ma, who was born in Hong Kong, was recently refused a visa there, apparently in retaliation for recent criticism of the proposed law.
Wu, who was joined by Minister of Foreign Affairs Mark Chen (陳唐山) and Vice Minister of National Defense Tsai Ming-hsien (蔡明憲), again called for international intervention.
They said that the international response to the bill so far had been inadequate.
Chen pointed to the words of concentration-camp survivor and Nobel Peace Prize winner Elie Wiesel, telling the foreign press yesterday that the Holocaust had occurred because "people chose neutrality."
"Ignorance and choosing to be neutral -- these are the two biggest problems," Chen said.
He said that the bill was clearly not a domestic matter because China had already discussed the matter with the US face-to-face.
When asked what the government hoped to see the international community do in response to China's actions, Wu said that, aside from popular censure, he hoped that governments would use whatever connections they had to get the message through to China.
Tsai's approach was more direct.
"I humbly ask the news media to reflect on what our people are thinking here," he told reporters.
"This is an urgent call to the international community to stop China before it is too late," Wu said.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or