The Bush administration on Wednesday moved to quell concerns over remarks earlier in the week by US Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage by saying that he had simply reiterated existing Taiwan policy in different language.
But Armitage's statement that the US was not legally bound to defend Taiwan against a Chinese attack has prompted a frenzied round of speculation among China watchers and Taiwan supporters in the US capital.
State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said all Armitage had done was to "restate US policy in very familiar terms."
But Boucher stopped short of saying that US policy toward Taiwan was unchanged, a normal mantra the department repeats when questioned about comments made by senior officials that appear inconsistent with administration policy.
Meanwhile, China and Taiwan specialists in Washington appear divided on the implications of Armitage's remarks.
During an interview on Monday on the PBS network, Armitage said that the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) did not require the US to defend Taiwan in case of Chinese military action, and that it only committed Washington to sell defensive arms to Taiwan and maintain sufficient force to deter a Chinese attack.
"We are not required to defend," he said.
He also stated that the decision to defend Taiwan rests not with the administration, but with Congress, and said Taiwan was emerging as a "landmine" in US-China relations,
Further, he said, "we all agree that there is but one China, and Taiwan is part of China."
The last remark reminded many observers of Secretary of State Colin Powell's recent statement that the US supported reunification of Taiwan with China, a statement Powell later distanced himself from.
However, several leading China watchers in the US say that Armitage's statements simply reflected reality and were a proper reading of the Taiwan Relations Act.
"It is a fact," said Bonnie Glaser, an expert on US-Taiwan-China relations.
"He didn't embellish US policy, he did not misstate US policy. He stated the facts," Glaser said.
"I don't think that this is an attempt to signal China that if Taiwan takes provocative action and you use force, that the US is not going to come to Taiwan's defense," she said.
For several months, some China specialists have speculated that the Bush administration has gone back on its earlier firm support of Taiwan, and now feels that the US is not committed to defend Taiwan against China under all circumstances.
Soon after taking office, Bush declared in an April 2001 TV interview that his administration would do "whatever it took" to help defend Taiwan.
That position was reiterated last December after Bush's White House meeting with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶), in which Bush publicly berated President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) for pushing an election-day referendum.
After the meeting with Wen, however, a high-level official told reporters that the "whatever it took" policy still stood.
And as recently as July, the commander of US forces in the Pacific, Admiral Thomas Fargo, backed that stance when meeting top Chinese officials in Beijing.
Glaser said she was told as much by Chinese analysts during a visit to Beijing in August, shortly after Fargo's trip.
The administration has sent "clear signals" to the Chinese that "there is no circumstance to which it can use force and the US would look the other way ... that Washington would not tolerate any force by China," she said.
During Fargo's talks with the officials, "that was one of the messages he conveyed quite clearly," the Chinese analysts told Glaser.
But Armitage's remarks have highlighted a feeling in recent weeks that the administration is backing down from its earlier, unequivocally pro-Taiwan stance.
The remarks "underscore the steady deterioration of US/Taiwan relations under the Bush/Chen administrations since 2001," said this week's edition of the influential inside-Washington newsletter, the Nelson Report.
"Clearly, a player as sophisticated as Armitage knows the difference between misstatements and nuance in singing the `one China mantra,'" editor Chris Nelson wrote, especially in view of Powell's earlier statement.
Indeed, Nelson wrote, Bush "himself has led a concerted effort to make it clear to Taipei that the US almost certainly will not defend the island if it is the actions of Taiwan which seemingly provoked a Chinese attack."
Nevertheless, he wrote, "the Bush administration is not `abandoning' Taiwan," but that the trend under Bush is that the administration has worked actively "to res-train what it sees as the dangerous tendencies of Chen Shui-bian and the pro-independence political factions on Taiwan."
In his comments to reporters on Wednesday, Boucher reiterated US support for renewed cross-strait dialogue.
"It's an issue we spend a lot of time working on, and we try to help people move towards a peaceful dialogue and a peaceful resolution of the issues," he said.
He said he did not know whether the administration was holding discussions with Taiwan's officials on the remark by Armitage.
Taiwan's Foreign Ministry on Wednesday said that it would ask its top representative in Washington, David Lee (李大維), to seek official clarification of Armitage's remarks.
BAIL APPEALS: The former vice premier was ordered to be held incommunicado despite twice being granted bail and paying a total of NT$12 million in bond The Taoyuan District Court yesterday ordered the detention of former vice premier Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦), who is being investigated for alleged corruption while serving as Taoyuan mayor from December 2014 to December 2022, and that he be held incommunicado. The court made the ruling during a bail hearing after prosecutors appealed its bail ruling twice. Cheng on Saturday was released after posting bail of NT$5 million (US$153,818). However, after prosecutors lodged an appeal, the High Court on Monday revoked the original ruling and ordered the Taoyuan District Court to hold another bail hearing. On Tuesday, the district court granted bail to Cheng a second
The Thai government on Friday announced that Taiwanese would be allowed to stay in the country for up to 60 days per entry, under the Southeast Asian country’s visa-free program starting from today. Taiwan is among 93 countries included in the Thai visa-waiver program, which has been expanded from 57 countries, with the visa-exempt entry extended from 30 to 60 days. After taking office last year, Thai Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin has vowed to grant more visa waivers to foreign travelers as part of efforts to stimulate tourism. The expanded visa-waiver program was on Friday signed by Thai Minister of the Interior Anutin
PEACE AND SECURITY: China’s military ambitions present ‘the greatest strategic challenge to Japan and the world, Japan’s annual defense white paper said yesterday Japan yesterday warned that China risked escalating tensions with Taiwan with an increase in military exercises that appeared aimed in part at readying Beijing’s forces for a possible invasion. Japan’s annual assessment of security threats, including those posed by China, North Korea and Russia, comes as Taiwan closely monitors Chinese People’s Liberation Army air and sea exercises, including one with the Shandong aircraft carrier in the Pacific Ocean. The drills are the latest in a series including maneuvers in the Taiwan Strait last year that a senior US general said would be key to any invasion. “Because of that increase in military activity,
HAN KUANG: The exercises, which are to run from July 22 to 26, will feature unscripted war games and a decentralized command and control structure, military officers said The armed forces would for the first time test new rules of engagement (ROE) at this month’s annual Han Kuang exercises, the Ministry of National Defense (MND) said yesterday. The exercises, which are to run from July 22 to 26, will feature unscripted war games, and a decentralized command and control structure, military officers told a news conference in Taipei. ROE cards would be issued to select combat troops to test their ability to function without tight control, they said. The most recent edition of the rules was published last year, they said. One of the cards’ two templates identifies enemy targets that soldiers