The US Monday came down squarely against any attempt to change the name of Taiwan's semi-official presence in Washington from the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office (TECRO) in the US, saying any change would alter Taiwan's status quo, which would run afoul of a basic tenet of the Bush administration's policy toward Taiwan.
State Department Spokesman Adam Ereli expressed the administration's unhappiness with the proposed name changes in response to statements by President Chen Shui-bian (
"These changes of terminology for government-controlled enterprises or economic and cultural offices abroad," Ereli told reporters in his daily press briefing, "in our view, would appear to unilaterally change Taiwan's status, and for that reason, we're not supportive of them."
"The United States has an interest in maintaining stability of the Taiwan Strait," Ereli asserted. "And we are, therefore, opposed to any unilateral steps that would change the status quo."
Responding to Ereli's statement, former American Institute in Taiwan chairman Nat Bellocchi conceded that a name change for TECRO "could come closer to sovereignty issues" than any changes in the names of state-controlled corporations, which are an internal affairs.
As a result, the Chen administration should "proceed carefully" with any plans for such name changes, said Bellocchi, who was AIT chairman from 1990 to 1995.
Taiwan's office in Washington was set up in 1979, after the Carter administration switched official diplomatic recognition of China from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime in Taipei to the People's Republic of China in Beijing.
It was then called the Coordination Council for North American Affairs (CCNAA), and was created under the Taiwan Relations Act that established the unofficial US-Taiwan ties that continue to this day.
The name of CCNAA was changed to its current name, usually referred to as TECRO, in 1994, under a Taiwan policy review conducted that year by the Clinton administration. Under TECRO are 12 other Taiwan offices in various US cities, which were and are called Taipei Economic and Cultural Offices (TECO).
TECRO acts as the unofficial Taiwan embassy in Washington, and its head is regularly referred to as "ambassador" by individuals and members of Congress alike, although most government officials shun that title.
Within a year after CCNAA was changed to TECRO, supporters of Taiwan in Congress began attempts to change the name again, to the Taiwan Representative Office.
A bill authorizing State Department programs for the fiscal years 1996 and 1997 contained a provision making such a change. The bill was passed by both the House and Senate, but President Bill Clinton vetoed it for a wide variety of reasons, and Congress failed to override the veto.
One of the reasons for his decision, Clinton said in his veto message, was a provision that would amend the Taiwan Relations Act to state that it superceded the 1982 third joint communique, which called for the eventual reduction in US arms sales to Taiwan.
The communique was "one of the cornerstones of our bipartisan policy toward China" and the provision would "complicate, not facilitate" US-China relations," Clinton said in his veto message. He did not raise any objection to the provision to change the name of TECRO, however.
Even Wyoming Republican Senator Craig Thomas, then the chairman of the East Asia and the Pacific subcommittee who was supportive of better ties with China, in a floor speech before the veto, conceded that, "I fail to see how this simple [TECRO] name change can cause so much consternation."
Also see stories:
DPP caucus defends name-change plan
Airline, other firms resistant to name change proposal
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or