While Premier Yu Shyi-kun vowed yesterday that the Cabinet would not revoke the Taipei City Govern-ment's permit for a massive demonstration on Saturday, newly appointed Minister of the Interior Su Jia-chyuan (
"While we hope the city government will cancel the application [filed by the pan-blue alliance], I hope the city authorities will shoulder all responsibility if they decide to uphold their original decision," Yu said.
The Cabinet will not nullify the application of the planned mass demonstration, Yu said, because the last thing he wanted to see was the public blaming the Cabinet for encroaching on the city's authority.
PHOTO: CHIANG YING-YING, TAIPEI TIMES
Su said that while he hoped to discuss the matter face to face with Ma on Friday, when he officially takes up his new position, he would settle for talking over the phone.
"It's not my intention to give orders to my old friend. I was just trying to help," he said.
Yu and Su made the remarks yesterday morning in response to media inquiries about the Cabinet's stance on the planned rally during a press conference where Yu officially announced Su's appointment.
Su succeeded Yu Cheng-hsien (
Su's remaining 20-month mandate will be fulfilled by Pingtung County Deputy Commissioner Wu Ying-wen (
In addition to Yu Cheng-hsien, Tsai Chao-ming (
National Police Administration Director-General Chang Si-liang (
Su yesterday said that he did not have time yet to ponder any possible candidates for Chang's successor but was convinced that he was a responsible and hard-working person.
Yu Shyi-kun said that he respected Su's choice for his successor as long as it was the right person in the right place.
The premier also made it clear that the setting up of a special committee under a special law to investigate the election-eve assassination attempt -- as proposed in the Legislative Yuan by the pan-blue camp -- did not tally with the constitutional system of five government branches.
Yu Shyi-kun said that if the legislature passed the special law, the Cabinet would not rule out the possibility of requesting a constitutional interpretation from the Council of Grand Justices.
Commenting on the removal by police of college students staging a "hunger strike" at the CKS Memorial Hall, Yu Shyi-kun said that the move was based on the government's concern over the students' health.
"However, we'll do our best to safeguard their right of assembly if they insist on making their appeals via peaceful means," he said.
No more than 15 students at one time are taking turns going without food for 12 hours, calling their action a hunger strike. The students started the protest on Friday to call on political leaders across party lines to apologize for what the students call the social disorder of the past four years and to establish a "truth task force" to investigate the attempted assassination of the president and vice president. They also accuse Chen of manipulating the media and abandoning administrative neutrality.
Also See Stories:
Mind your own business: Ma
`Hunger-strikers' linked to parties
Pan-blues want task-force referendum
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say