China has rejected a visa application by a US congressional commission to visit the mainland next week on official business, despite the group's official sanction by the State Department and Congress, and an invitation by the US ambassador to Beijing Clark Randt, in what some observers view as a major Chinese slap to Washington, the Taipei Times has learned.
Members of the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, which has been critical of many of Beijing's actions, had applied for visas under their official passports issued by the State Department to meet with US and Chinese officials in Beijing as part of the commission's preparation for a biannual report on US-China relations due to be issued this spring.
But the authorities in Beijing on Wednesday refused to grant the visas, insisting the group travel on tourist visas under conditions that could have landed the members of the commission in Chinese prisons, a commission member said. The commission refused, and the trip was scrubbed.
The commission still plans to visit Japan, Taiwan and Hong Kong, and will be in Taipei during the presidential election, sources say.
It would have been the commission's second trip to China. The first, in 2002, came before the commission issued its first report on China's economic, military and political situation, which was highly critical of China's military buildup and other activities.
It is uncertain why China took such a hard line toward the second trip, commission members say. It might be that the Beijing authorities simply do not like the commission and what it has been saying and doing.
The denial of the visas comes to light in the wake of the appearance of Hong Kong's leading pro-democracy advocate, Martin Lee (
But commission members could not say whether the two events were directly linked, noting that China was "jerking around" the members on the visa issue well before the hearing or the Lee trip was scheduled.
In refusing to allow the group to travel on official passports, China laid down the following conditions for travel on non-official tourist visas, according to a letter the commission sent to Senate Majority Leader William Frist, a copy of which was obtained by the Taipei Times.
"1. That we state that we are not coming to China as members of the Commission; 2. that we state that are not conducting activities as members of the Commission; and 3. that we vow not to conduct activities that interfere in the internal affairs of China and Hong Kong."
Commission members view the first two conditions as insulting enough. But the third condition, they noted, could land them in prison, since China could view any effort to gain information or talk to Chinese people as interfering in the country's internal affairs, a serious crime that could carry long prison terms.
"We found that complying with these conditions would be inappropriate behavior for appointees of the Congressional leadership and would not allow us to effectively carry out our work on behalf of the Congress," commission chairman Roger Robinson and vice chairman Richard D'Amato wrote to Frist on Wednesday.
"We believe that accepting these conditions would threaten our standing as official representatives of the Congress, and moreover, would undermine the respectability of our Commission and the Congress," the letter added.
"Despite repeated attempts to negotiate a reasonable compromise," the letter to Frist said, "including offers to accept any category of visa on our official passports and not to travel under the name of the Commission, we regret to inform you that the Chinese Government refused to respond to our visa request prior to our communicated travel deadline of March 2."
The following day, China set down the travel conditions and the commission had to drop plans for the trip.
The commission was set up by Congress in 2000 as part of a authorization bill for defense spending for fiscal year 2001. The idea was to keep an eye on China's economic and military postures and how they might affect the United States and US-China relations.
In its 2002 report, the commission warned about China's military buildup, especially its missile buildup across the Strait from Taiwan and called for increased military operational integration between Washington and Taipei recommendations that infuriated Beijing.
It is understood that the commission is still trying to find an acceptable way to make the China trip at a later date.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS