The pan-blue camp's amended version of the Referendum Law (公民投票法), which puts more restrictions on initiating a defensive referendum, will get its first reading in the Legislative Yuan tomorrow.
The new version would require an emergency order and approval from the legislature before a defensive referendum could be called.
"The amendment will not be passed by the legislature before the election due to a four-month-long cross-party negotiation. But the proposal aims to remind the public that President Chen Shui-bian's (
The DPP caucus threatened to block the amendment in the upcoming cross-party negotiation.
"The pan-blue's proposal cannot obstruct the March 20 referendum," DPP caucus leader Tsai Huang-liang (蔡煌瑯) said. "The pan-blue camp is trying to prevent the public from exercising their right to a referendum. If the pan-blue camp tried to push the proposal through, the pan-green camp would oppose it to the end."
The pan-blue camp's amendment for Article 17, which demands that holding a defensive referendum will require an emergency order and approval by the Legislative Yuan, was passed by the legislature's Procedure Committee on Tuesday.
However, the Taiwan Solidarity Union's (TSU) proposal to eliminate the Referendum Review Committee (公投審議委員會) was rejected. Both TSU and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators in the Procedure Committee withdrew from the session in protest.
The Referendum Law passed only two months ago but because all parties were unsatisfied with the articles in the law, the KMT, TSU and DPP have each proposed an amended version.
The KMT's amendment tried to give the legislature more power to control the initiation of a defensive referendum, and the proposal ties up the defensive referendum with the president's right to issue an emergent order -- if the country is under external threat which may rattle the country's sovereignty, the president can issue an emergency order to hold a referendum, but the order needs to be endorsed by the Legislative Yuan within 10 days. If the legislature does not agree to the order, it would be nullified.
Meanwhile, the pan-green camp aims to give the Executive Yuan the right to initiate a referendum and to allow the public to decide on a new constitution by referendum.
After the committee passed the pan-blue's version, Tseng said that the proposal aimed to remind the public that the referendum on March. 20 was illegal.
The Executive Yuan also attacked the pan-blue camp's amended version saying an emergency order would restrict the people's right.
"Article 17 bestows the president with the right to hold a defensive referendum to prevent a crisis from happening," Cabinet Spokesman Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said. "However, things like an emergency order or right to announce martial law mean that the country has gone into a military or economic crisis. They are different systems.
"So it is very confusing that the pan-blue legislators are trying to amend the Referendum Law so that when the president wants to initiate a defensive referendum he needs to issue an emergency order," he said. "Plus, Article 17 only says that `if the country is likely to suffer from an external threat,' and it does not mean that the country is being invaded. So the president has some space for his own judgment."
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or