President Chen Shui-bian (
"It is an act of selfishness that Lien Chan said he would not pick up his referendum ballots yet at the same time asks others to vote for him [in the presidential election]," Chen said.
During Saturday's election debate, Lien, representing the KMT-People First Party (PFP) alliance in the presidential race, said that while he respected others' decision on whether to cast ballots, he would not be voting in the March 20 referendum, calling it illegal.
PHOTO: LUO PEI-TEH, TAIPEI TIMES
"What is an illegal referendum? Who has the right to call it an illegal referendum?" Chen asked. "Whether a referendum is legal should be left for the grand justices to decide."
"You [Lien] cannot claim yourself a judge and declare that something is illegal," Chen said.
Chen said the people of Taiwan should support the March 20 referendum in order to score a victory for the country.
"It would be a victory for China's Communist Party if the referendum fails," he said.
Chen also criticized the system endorsed by the KMT-PFP alliance of granting 18 percent interest rates to retired military personnel, civil servants and teachers.
"Why does Lien favor the 18 percent interest rate? Because he, as a former vice president, is the recipient of an 18 percent interest rate," Chen said at a meeting with labor union supporters in Taipei yesterday.
"[With the preferential rate] Lien gets a monthly income of approximately NT$400,000, which is more than [the monthly income] of Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮)," Chen said.
Meanwhile, Lien, branding Chen as capricious, said yesterday that more rounds of debate would be like "a bad drama that just doesn't know when to end."
At the end of Saturday's debate, Chen invited Lien to participate in another two debates. Lien then shied away from giving a definite answer.
Citing a poll that said 54 percent of respondents thought there was no need to have further debate, Lien said, "It is hard to focus on issues while debating with Chen because Chen is so inconsistent. I don't see the need to carry on a bad drama."
While the pan-blue camp's big boss declined more debate with Chen, Lien's campaign aides said yesterday that they would visit the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) today and request a debate between the two camps' youth departments on enlistment.
During Saturday's debate, Lien proposed that young people perform only three months of national service and that the country abandon conscription.
Chen, pointing out that Lien's son has not done his military service, said conscription cannot be scrapped just because certain individuals do not want to do their military service.
Meanwhile, polls showed Chen and Lien were still neck and neck after Saturday's debate.
A poll conducted by the Chinese-language China Times indicated that 37 percent of viewers felt that Chen was more eloquent and quick-witted than his opponent, who received an approval rate of 28 percent.
A survey by the United Daily News suggested that 39 percent of viewers favored Lien's performance, while 38 percent thought Chen was a better debater.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or