Yesterday's weekly Cabinet meeting became a verbal battlefield for Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Kaohsiung Mayor Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) over the planned referendum.
Claiming to speak on behalf of the public and local government chiefs, Ma questioned the legality and necessity of the referendum proposed by President Chen Shui-bian (
He also proposed that the referendum be separated from the presidential election at the polls.
Hsieh, however, questioned Ma's representation of the people and other elected local leaders and said Ma misconstrued the Referendum Law (
Hsieh branded Ma's criticism of the planned referendum an insult.
Seeking to relieve the tension among his colleagues, Premier Yu Shyi-kun called on government employees and agencies to fulfill their duties and help the Cabinet hold the first national referendum.
Cabinet Spokesman Lin Chia-lung (
As the Referendum Law clearly mandates that the president has the right to initiate a referendum to safeguard the sovereignty and security of the nation if he deems the nation is in danger, Yu said, it is without a doubt legal for Chen to hold the referendum.
According to Lin, the war of words between Ma and Hsieh and other Cabinet officials started when Ma called on Yu to send Chen's referendum proposal to the Referendum Review Committee, which would then examine its legality, necessity, urgency and appropriateness.
Ma argued that the referendum is not necessary because the nation is not in a state of emergency.
"The nation has been under military threat from China for half a century but has never been in a state of emergency. If Chen can call a `peace referendum' to safeguard national security, do future presidents have to do so every year?" he asked.
Ma also proposed separating the presidential election and the referendum because they are two different kinds of polls bound by two separate pieces of legislation and yielding two different results.
Cabinet officials, including Hsieh, Minister of Justice Chen Ding-nan (陳定南) and Mainland Affairs Council Chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), however, said it is legal for Chen Shui-bian to call the referendum and that the proposal does not require the consent of the Referendum Review Committee.
Chen Ding-nan said it was wrong for Ma to mention the peace referendum and state of emergency in the same breath because the referendum is meant to pre-empt a possible emergency situation, while a state of emergency is declared to deal with an emergency situation.
He said it is inappropriate for the Referendum Review Committee, a subordinate unit of the Cabinet, to review the referendum proposal, adding that the Referendum Law does not require the committee to do so.
Hsieh, meanwhile, criticized Ma's likening of the referendum to an act of theft and his branding of civil servants cooperating to hold the referendum as Chen's accomplices.
"It's clearly an insult and stigmatization of the head of state and civil servants," he said.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS