Questioning the legality and necessity of President Chen Shui-bian's (
The committee -- formed by the head of the Central Election Committee and representatives from all political parties according to their representation in the legislature -- is responsible for deciding whether a referendum proposed by the people is suitable.
"All the 14 [pan-blue] heads of cities and counties agreed that Chen's proposed referendum has serious flaws in its legality and necessity," Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) policy convener Tseng Yung-chuan (
"Therefore they see the need to have the proposed referendum content reviewed by the Referendum Review Committee strictly for its legality," he said.
The news conference was held following a meeting attended by all pan-blue mayors and county commissioners, except Taoyuan County Commissioner Chu Li-lun (
On Jan. 16, Chen unveiled the two questions that will be put to voters in a referendum on March 20, the same day as the presidential election.
The questions will ask the people of Taiwan whether they would support enhancing the nation's defense capabilities should China refuse to withdraw the missiles it has targeting Taiwan and whether the government should negotiate with China on cross-strait peace and stability.
The opposition KMT-People First party (PFP) alliance's initial response to Chen's announcement was to brand it "illegal" and to urge pan-blue local chiefs to boycott the referendum.
But there was no talk of a boycott yesterday, and the pan-blue alliance instead turned the subject over to the Executive Yuan.
Tseng urged Premier Yu Shyi-kun "not to blindly accommodate [Chen's] proposed referendum content without regard for law and [Yu] should instead present a clear, detailed explanation on the legality and necessity of Chen's proposed referendum."
"While the president [is calling the referendum] for the sake of personal campaign electioneering, the premier should be a role model to civil servants nationwide and hold fast to the basic principle of implementing rules according to the law," Tseng said.
"To sum up the consensus of the pan-blue local chiefs, they are opposed to illegal referendums and condemned the attempt to use the referendum as a tool to manipulate the presidential election."
Before the meeting, KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Also see story:
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS