A Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator said yesterday that a legislative resolution, suggested by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party (PFP) to revoke President Chen Shui-bian's (
The DPP, in the minority at the legislature, lost all of the 15 legislative showdowns while formulating the Referendum Law (
"The KMT and PFP are now deliberating an amendment to deprive the president of the power to take a referendum initiative, which indeed would prohibit people from any right to hold a referendum," Cho said.
The KMT and PFP meanwhile threatened to formulate a legislative resolution that would force Chen to recall the referendum on the two questions he unveiled on Friday. This is the way in which the opposition parties use bullying methods to get what they want in the legislature, Cho said.
Cho's criticisms were a response to opposition lawmakers vowing to push ahead with overhauling the Referendum Law to revoke the president's power of initiating referendums.
The KMT and PFP in addition planned to formulate a legislative resolution on the two referendum questions to compel the president to recall his referendum plan.
Cho said that the opposition's idea lacked a legal foundation in either the Constitution or the Referendum Law.
"Furthermore, the indirect democracy exercised by legislators cannot be stronger than a referendum, where the electorate directly voice their opinion through a public vote," he said.
Cho pledged that the DPP would protect the dignity of laws and safeguard people's right to hold referendums.
The pan-blue parties should easily be able to pass a legislative resolution, which merely requires approval from half of the 225-member legislature, since they form the majority in the Legislative Yuan.
A resolution driven by the opposition calling on the president to stop his referendum plan, however, would be unusual and engender a controversy over legislative power.
A resolution concerning the president's proclamation actually would be of little significance, since the legislative order has nothing to do with laws.
A DPP caucus leader nonetheless denounced such a motion.
"A legislative resolution cannot be in conflict with the law. The resolution proposed by the KMT and PFP would be null and void because President Chen proposed the referendum in accordance with the Referendum Law," said Tsai Huang-liang (
Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) whip Cheng Cheng-lung (程振隆) reminded his opposition counterparts that a legislative resolution could not supersede a referendum.
"In that case, a referendum by the people of Quebec to decide whether they want to be separate from Canada could be replaced by a parliamentary resolution that there is no need to have a referendum," Cheng said.
In related news, PFP legislator leader Chou Hsi-wei (
The alliance said on Saturday that it would request a constitutional interpretation by the Council of Grand Justices and also ask pan-blue mayors and county commissioners to boycott the referendum.
"Even if pan-blue mayors and county commissioners go along with it and support the referendum in their respective constituencies, what would happen if the council hands down its interpretation later and says the referendum is illegal?" Chou asked. He said that the local leaders would then, according to the law, face charges of holding illegal referendums.
"In that event, Chen or the Executive Yuan must assume all legal responsibility," Chou said, demanding that Chen make a public pledge about this matter.
(additional reporting by Huang Tai-lin)
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS