Voicing disapproval of President Chen Shui-bian's (
"Chen's referendum content is not a defensive referendum, not a preventive referendum nor a peace referendum. It is but a joke, an illegal referendum," said KMT policy committee convener Tseng Yung-chuan (
"Given that holding an illegal referendum would result in a fine and legal charges, it is thus in accordance with the law if heads of cities and counties do not go along with such a referendum," Tseng said.
On Friday night Chen unveiled the two questions that will be put to voters in a referendum on March 20 alongside the presidential election.
The two questions will ask the people of Taiwan whether they would support enhancing the nation's defensive capabilities should China refuse to withdraw the missiles it has targeted at Taiwan and to openly renounce the use of force against Taiwan; as well as negotiating with China on cross-strait peace and stability.
Questioning the necessity of spending huge sums of money on holding a referendum on issues that already enjoy solid consensus among the people, Tseng said that the alliance would propose to vote the content of Chen's referendum question -- without altering a word -- into a resolution when the Legislative Yuan convenes its new session on Feb. 6.
"Given that a legislative resolution is enough to express public opinion, we would then request President Chen Shui-bian to recall the need of holding such a referendum that would otherwise require spending as much as NT$500 million," Tseng said.
Citing the Referendum Law (公民投票法), which stipulates that a defensive referendum can be initiated by the president under the condition where the country faces an external threat that could interfere with national sovereignty, Tseng criticized Chen for "abusing the right [which the Legislative Yuan has entrusted to the president to call a defensive referendum] for a personal campaign."
Branding Chen's referendum content "an election ploy," Tseng added that, if Chen insists on holding such a referendum, the alliance would request an interpretation of the Constitution from the Council of Grand Justices.
"And before the Council of Grand Justices hands down an interpretation, President Chen, on the basis of showing respect for the law and justice, should stop proceeding with the illegal referendum on March 20," Tseng said.
Saying that all of Chen's referendum contents must first be previewed by the US government, PFP legislative leader Chou Hsi-wei (周錫瑋), who is also the deputy director of the alliance's policy department, called Chen's planned referendum "a mere paper-tiger referendum."
"What Chen did represents not the president of the Republic of China but rather a minister of a department under the US," Chou said at the press conference.
"Chen therefore should honestly admit his mistake and recall the illegal referendum immediately," he said.
Su Chi (
"Although Chen had changed the wording of his referendum question, it is still a concern to the international community whether it would be a step toward changing the nation's status quo," Su said.
Meanwhile, KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰), at a campaign event in Kaohsiung yesterday, slammed Chen's call for a referendum and said it "did not adhere to the qualifications and spirit of the Referendum Law but serves only as a tool for his own personal and the DPP's presidential campaign electioneering.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS