After a wrenching debate on its cross-strait policy over recent weeks, the George W. Bush administration has decided to retain its existing policy, while leaning hard on President Chen Shui-bian (
Bush is expected to reiterate exiting American policy when he holds intense discussions with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
This will be in the face of what observers say will be a strong effort by Wen to get Washington to definitively oppose Taiwan's independence and make other changes in US-Taiwan policy favorable to Beijing.
The main concern of the Bush administration, sources say, is to prevent any instability in the Strait while Bush is preoccupied with such issues as North Korea, Iraq and terrorism, at a time when US forces are stretched thin by Iraq, and when Bush faces what could be a tough re-election campaign next year, where any foreign policy complication could hurt him politically.
Bush wants Chen "lashed down pretty tight," said one source.
Meanwhile, there was no firm confirmation in Washington of reports that the top National Security Council China aide, James Moriarty, on Monday delivered a personal letter from Bush to Chen that expressed Washington's strong dissatisfaction with Chen's recent statements, culminating with his plans to hold a "defensive referendum" in connection with the March 20 presidential election.
Many observers fear such a referendum could deal with issues related to independence, which could spark a major crisis with Beijing and cause severe discomfort in Washington at a time when Bush is totally consumed with the Korea-Iraq-terrorism triumvirate plus pre-election domestic issues.
While saying he could not speak for the president, a White House spokesman said that "the policy is unchanged," and that Bush will tell Wen that when they meet.
The US leader will also tell Wen that Washington also opposes any Chinese use of force in the Strait or any other similar action that could destabilize the region, the spokesman said.
The spokesman would neither confirm nor deny that Moriarty delivered the reported letter.
In recent weeks, during their advanced planning for Wen's visit, White House, State Department, Pentagon and other officials laid out a series of "options" to current policy, sources say.
These included, significantly, a public pronouncement that Washington "opposes" Taiwan's independence, and a return to the Clinton-era "three noes" policy. That policy would say "no" to Taiwan's independence, a "two China or one-China-one-Taiwan" policy, or Taiwan's membership in international organizations which require statehood.
The administrations' current policy is that it "does not support" independence and sticks to a "one-China" policy. The Bush administration has also supported Taiwan's participation in such global organizations as the World Health Organization.
As the debate over policy was raging, the State Department apparently got the White House to agree to retain the current policy, fearing that any restating of policy would open up a can of worms that would give the administration another foreign policy crisis.
With the White House acceptance of the State Department's position, a series of high-level meetings scheduled for this week to review the options were cancelled. They were postponed until after the Wen visit, apparently to give the administration the time for a more relaxed consideration of Taiwan-China-US relations.
The newly-reaffirmed US policy toward Taiwan, has one nuanced difference from before. Washington now proclaims that while it does not support independence, it also does not want Taiwan to take "moves toward" independence.
This phraseology was adopted in October in the wake of the Bush meeting with President Hu Juntao (
Denying that, an unnamed US official told reporters at the time that Bush had said he doesn't support moves toward independence.
That was a time when Chen was beginning his campaign to hold one or more referendums next year and write a new constitution by 2006, which would become effective in 2008.
The US obsession with tranquility in the Strait was underscored in an interview last week by a "senior White House official," believed to be Moriarty, with the Hong Kong-based Phoenix TV, which is aimed at the Chinese and China-based foreigner elite.
The officials stressed repeatedly the non-support for "any unilateral moves by people from either side of the Strait to change the status quo," and repeatedly warned Taiwan not to take "steps moving toward independence."
While asserting that the US would "have to help" if China used force, the official played down the "semantic" distinction between "do not support" and "oppose," stressing that the main objective is peace and stability in the Strait.
The official made it clear that Washington would not support a change in Taiwan's name, flag or concept of sovereignty.
"That's where we get into areas that discomfort the US administration," he said.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or