An espionage trial of a US-based democracy activist, which is seen as an important test case for the new Chinese government's views on dissent, ended behind closed doors without a verdict yesterday.
Yang Jianli (
"He used his right to defend himself in court and declared himself innocent of both charges," Mo Shaoping told reporters shortly after the three-hour trial ended.
The court will not announce a verdict immediately, but under normal circumstances it should be expected within six weeks, he said.
The punishment meted out to Yang may help show whether China's political climate has changed after a new generation of leaders took over earlier this year, observers said.
"The case might provide some perspective on new President Hu Jintao (
Forty-year-old Yang, a US resident on a Chinese blacklist of people barred from entry, was detained in April last year after he traveled to China on a friend's passport in an attempt to observe ongoing labor unrest.
"He declared himself innocent of illegal entry, since as a Chinese citizen he has a right to return to his home country," said Mo, the lawyer.
According to a copy of an opinion recommending prosecution issued by the Beijing Bureau of National Security, the spying charge is based on activities that took place a decade ago.
Yang's supporters have said these activities are entirely innocuous, including the donation of US$100 for a Chinese agricultural scientist's research into papaya trees.
The spuriousness of the spying charge is the likely reason why China decided to close the trial, barring relatives or US embassy staff from attending, according to Genser.
"If the outside world did attend, and saw the evidence, it would probably have a very large question about why he is being charged with espionage at all," he said.
An espionage conviction can carry the death penalty in China, although it is unlikely to be used in Yang's case due to the high level of foreign interest in it.
Both Lorne Craner, the US State Department's top human rights official, and James Kelly, its leading East Asia hand, have met with Chinese embassy officials to urge more transparency in the case, sources said.
Last week the US Senate unanimously passed a resolution warning that cases like Yang's could harm relations between Beijing and Washington.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS