Letters mailed to Lienchiang County, which includes the island of Matsu, often go astray. The reason: China also has a Lienchiang County, which is just a few kilometers from Taiwan's.
The "small three links," initiated in January 2001, allow trade, mail and people to cross the small stretch of water between Taiwan's Kinmen and Lienchiang counties and China's Fujian Province.
The new links between the two government agencies with the name Lienchiang County sometimes leave the mailmen baffled.
To end to the confusion, the Lienchiang County Government under Taiwan's control recently proposed surveying its residents on whether the county's name should be changed to Matsu, a name more familiar to the public.
"Ever since we started implementing the `small three links,' cases of mail being misdelivered -- because of confusion between my county and that of China's -- are frequent," said Lienchiang County Commissioner Chen Hsueh-sheng (
The confusion is a legacy of the Chinese civil war. In 1949, the retreating KMT forces took control of the province of Taiwan and also of Kinmen and Matsu, which are part of Fujian Province.
All of Kinmen County came under the KMT's control, but only part of Lienchiang County.
The opening of direct mail links between the two sides has now brought the situation to a head, Chen said.
"I personally have no specific preference as to whether the county's name should stay as Lienchiang or be changed to Matsu," said Chen, who is a member of the PFP. "The proposal is suggested purely to put an end to all the arguments over the county's name."
Aside from problems of missing mail, Chen said that many locals advocated the name change because Matsu is a more commonly used name.
Most of people in Taiwan know the 19 islets that make up Taiwan-controlled Lienchiang County as Matsu rather than by its official name.
"People who wish to have the county's name changed to Matsu said that Matsu was a name that's more well-known and recognizable to outsiders and has a higher profile in the international community," Chen said.
Chen, however, also noted that there were some locals who opposed the name change because it smacked of the independence stance held by the DPP government.
"Some people are concerned that to change the county's name would seem to support former president Lee Teng-hui's (
Chen was referring to comments by Lee that called on Taiwanese to forge a new Constitution and change the nation's name from the Republic of China to Taiwan.
"Some, who want to uphold the historical name of Lienchiang, regard any change to the county's name as a precursor to Taiwan's independence," Chen said.
The commissioner also said that because the county has only 9,000 residents, some feared that pushing for the name change would give central government politicians an excuse to abrogate Lienchiang's status as a county.
"Given all these various opinions on whether the county should change its name, we hope a majority stance can be ascertained through a survey, thereby ending the arguments," Chen said.
The county government has hired a polling company to carry out the survey, he said.
"The firm has just finished a series of explanatory meetings around the islands on this matter," Chen said. "The survey is likely to be held no later than June."
He said the survey would then be distributed to all households.
"If 70 to 80 percent of the people agree to have the county's name changed, then the county government will go ahead and submit the proposal to the county council," Chen said.
"If the county council passes the proposal, then it will take the issue to the Ministry of the Interior to begin the procedure to change the name," he said.
While this procedure is mandated in the Law on Local Government Systems (地方制度法), Lienchiang's move would set a precedent.
"So far, no local government has made such a request," said Lin Mei-chu (
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS