Faced with finding a suitable new party chairman, DPP headquarters announced yesterday that it supports the idea of having the head of state lead the party while it is in power and having party members directly elect the chairman when it is in the opposition.
The move may pave the way for the party's ultimate goal of adopting a fully presidential system.
Taiwan is currently practicing a semi-presidential political system modeled in part on the French system.
If all goes well, President Chen Shui-bian (
The party is scheduled to elect the new chairman on May 26.
So far, in addition to Lee Chin-yung (
Briefing the media after the weekly closed-door Central Standing Committee meeting yesterday afternoon, DPP Chairman Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) said that it was the consensus reached by the six committee members attending yesterday's meeting to have the head of state lead the party.
"We think that the president is the one who is most qualified to lead the party not only because he enjoys strong public support but also his term of office is four years, unlike that of legislative leaders, which is only one year," Hsieh said.
Although Chen had pledged to stay out of party affairs after taking office, Hsieh said that he is optimistic that the president will be willing to head the DPP if that is the ultimate decision made by the party.
"I'm sure the president will respect the party's final decision, as long as it's a consensus that is reached by all party members," he said.
Hsieh added that it would be a plus for Chen's future re-election bid if he were to head the DPP concurrently.
"I believe that the public would like to see a government which is efficient and unified," Hsieh said.
In response to a question concerning whether the party is reversing its stance on opposing the idea of having the head of state lead the party, Hsieh said that there is nothing wrong with the practice.
"What went awry during the KMT rule was that the party's chairman did not enjoy any public support but still headed the nation," he said.
Before the extraordinary national meeting takes place on April 20, Hsieh said the party welcomes party members, including lawmakers and local government officials, to hold a public debate to discuss the matter.
If the conclusion reached in the debate is different from yesterday's resolution, Hsieh said, both the two proposals will be presented to the national meeting for further review and final approval.
During yesterday's meeting, committee members also touched on the topic of internal party reforms.
All committee members agreed that it was better to integrate the party with the government than simply make the DPP a mere "election machine."
"We still think the party has to take part in the government's policy-making process instead of becoming just an election machine," Hsieh said.
To make the party function more efficiently, committee members also proposed to make certain adjustments.
They include recruiting high-ranking Cabinet officials to be Central Standing Committee members, restructuring the party's organization, and resuming the training programs of government officials.Also See Story:
Editorial: Keep party and state separate
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS