In the thick of campaign season for next month’s high-stakes presidential and legislative elections, Reporters Without Borders (RSF) will hold its first conference in Taiwan tomorrow on the theme of “Disinformation: Time for Solutions.”
“As the elections are approaching, the risk of disinformation attacks is getting bigger and bigger,” Cedric Alviani, RSF East Asia bureau head, told the Taipei Times. It’s a risk that “will remain until Taiwan properly addresses the problem of its media environment.”
It’s a media environment “plagued by sensationalism, undeclared advertising and an unhealthy ‘blue-green’ political polarization that hinders journalism in its role as a balancing power, stirring public distrust,” Alviani wrote in an open letter from the RSF published in the Taipei Times last week.
Photo: Reuters
“It is not that Taiwan lacks competent journalists, but most of them have to work under undue pressure and cannot count on legal protection against requests from their management that would go against journalistic ethics,” Alviani wrote.
While good journalistic practice has conventionally meant avoiding becoming part of the news story, in the war against disinformation, journalists find themselves fighting in the trenches, and an integral part of the story themselves.
In Taiwan, that story is combined with front-line exposure to China’s economic rise and growing assertiveness in geopolitics, making it one of the most compelling vectors for tackling disinformation in the 21st century.
Photo courtesy of Reporters Without Borders
INFORMATION WARFARE
The threat of disinformation is neither new nor unique to Taiwan. Countries around the world have developed heightened awareness and defences since the allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election, but propaganda has been around for much of human history.
Now, however, there is “renewed interest in learning about and from Taiwan’s own experiences,” J. Michael Cole, a policy analyst and editor-in-chief of Taiwan Sentinel told the Taipei Times. This is part of a “global awakening to the realities of contact with Beijing.”
Photo courtesy of Reporters Without Borders
“Taiwan obviously is a special case because of Beijing’s ambitions to annex it,” Cole, a former Taipei Times deputy news editor, added. “It’s one of the very few societies that shares a language and to a certain extent a culture with China, so that creates many more avenues” by which China can exert influence.
Cole, who will deliver a keynote speech on Chinese disinformation in Taiwan, pointed out that one area in which Beijing has proven adept is that of “gray-zone” tactics that may not be illegal under existing laws, but are arguably unethical.
That includes exercising control through media owners with strong commercial interests in China, a prominent example of which was seen in the Financial Times’ reporting that local media outlets The China Times and CtiTV (中天電視) — owned by Taiwanese food conglomerate Want Want China Times Group — took orders from Beijing.
Such tactics have made it even trickier for the government to balance protecting freedom of expression and clamping down effectively on disinformation.
“If Taiwan were not a democracy, it would be quite easy for the government to come up with the solutions,” Cole said. “The last thing that you want to do is go down a road where you start curtailing freedom of expression. By doing so... Beijing wins, because it gets what it wants.”
Echoing the challenge that lies before the government, Alviani, who will deliver a keynote speech on media certification, said that Taiwan’s problematic media environment is “not something that the government itself can change… but we believe some kind of impulse must come from the authorities.”
At the same time, leaving it entirely up to the government to decide what is legitimate and fake news is also an undesirable outcome that potentially hinders journalists’ ability to hold power accountable.
One remaining option is a form of self-regulation emanating from the journalism profession itself, such as the Journalism Trust Initiative by the RSF, which is developing a set of indicators for the trustworthiness of journalism, and seeks to promote and reward compliance with journalistic ethics.
“Taiwan needs to re-establish trust from the people to the media, because the problem so far is that most people in Taiwan do not [differentiate] between a legitimate news Web site and a Web site that would purposely carry misinformation,” Alviani said.
Combining the unique challenges of Chinese designs on Taiwan, as well as Taiwan’s own commitment to democracy and freedom of expression, tomorrow’s conference will be an opportunity to hear insights and solutions from within the journalism profession itself.
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
President William Lai’s (賴清德) March 13 national security speech marked a turning point. He signaled that the government was finally getting serious about a whole-of-society approach to defending the nation. The presidential office summarized his speech succinctly: “President Lai introduced 17 major strategies to respond to five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces: China’s threat to national sovereignty, its threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting Taiwan’s military, its threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan, its threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges, and its threats from
RSS