When the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami hit Japan on March 11, 2011, it dragged out a blue-and-white sampan or wooden fishing boat, with serial number MG3-44187 and cast it adrift in the ocean.
Three years later, that same boat was found shipwrecked off the coast of Taitung. It is now slumped against the entrance to the Museum of Contemporary Art, Taipei, where the curators of Co/Inspiration in Catastrophes (災難的靈視) have placed it as a symbol of the irrelevance of national borders when natural disaster strikes.
In a video playing in the museum, curator Huang Chien-hung (黃建宏) explains that the show’s thesis started with a question posed by his co-curator Yuki Pan (潘小雪): Why do so many natural disasters befall Taiwan’s eastern coast? The country experiences an average of 22 earthquakes a year, with 70 percent centered in the northeast.
Photo courtesy of Ai Weiwei Studio
Geology aside, the curators soon found themselves up against the systems, laws and policies in place to detect and react to natural disasters, opening up the larger question of human intervention.
The resulting collection of works by 16 artists, on view at the museum until Feb. 9, examines the role of humans in catastrophic change of all kinds. They range from first responders to natural disasters to progenitors of political movements, and from victims of colonization and urban renewal to masters of their own fate.
If this all sounds very disparate, that’s exactly how it feels walking through the exhibition. While individual works contain thought-provoking nuggets, as a whole, the juxtaposition of such a wide range of topics is enough to give you whiplash. It also reduces the show’s impact.
Photo: Davina Tham, Taipei Times
‘BE WATER’
But back to the sampan. A short walk away is another boat, a “Lennon ship” created by a group of Hong Kong students and sympathizers at the Taipei National University of the Arts (TNUA). It’s less a seaworthy vessel, and more a symbol of the ongoing protest movement’s mantra to “be water” and find resilience in fluidity.
The political unrest and violence that have engulfed Hong Kong are treated here as one of the many types of human-made catastrophes, and also reflect Taiwan’s preoccupation with developments in the semi-autonomous city.
Photo courtesy of Museum of Contemporary Art Taipei
Inside the museum, the TNUA students use a timeline of protest imagery and video footage to present the movement’s ideals. It’s nothing you haven’t seen on the news — until you get to a makeshift living room where the conflict has been translated into family drama radio plays.
Through headphones, characters debate inheritance, who gets to make decisions for the family and the use of violence as a way to discipline the children. Family conflict is universal, and here it becomes a way of understanding the deeply felt beliefs of the geopolitical actors.
China-watchers will also be drawn to arguably the biggest name in this exhibition, Ai Weiwei (艾未未), the Chinese artist and activist who has run afoul of Beijing’s censors for years now. But his works focus on a different part of the world entirely — migrant crossings from the Middle East to Europe, and the nowhere lands of refugee camps.
Photo courtesy of MOCA, Taipei
The tone is set by the wallpaper, Odyssey, which depicts caravans and boats of refugees in the style of ancient Egyptian art, giving them the gravitas of those paintings. In four documentaries, Ai presents in unflinching detail the lives of people who have fled war and poverty only to endure more suffering.
There are attempts to assign responsibility, particularly in the feature-length Human Flow, which spans some 40 refugee camps. Ai interviews humanitarians and experts, who discuss the effect of government refugee deals and policies that are never made with the refugee’s interests in mind.
That underscores the newness of refugee voices being given time and space in prestigious institutions like an art museum. It elicits empathy, and gives a sense of the immense geographical and historical scale of this flow of humanity. A mother trying to express her worries about her children’s future is overwhelmed with emotion and vomits into a metal can. A man points to the grave of his brother and shuffles through a deck of identity cards, pointing out the ones who have died.
Photo courtesy of MOCA, Taipei
The exhibition also addresses Taiwan’s own history of natural disasters. The effect that such calamities have had on Aboriginal communities is particularly pronounced, and is given appropriate attention in a few works by Aboriginal artists.
Ikong Hacii renders delicate and dignified hand-drawn portraits of people from her Sediq community, whose villages were destroyed in the eponymous Typhoon Toraji. The typhoon hit eastern Taiwan in July 2001 and killed at least 200 people.
Rukai artist Eleng Luluan and Puyuma artist collective Pakavulay use traditional weaving techniques to create sculptures that comment on the destruction and reconstruction and Aboriginal communities and cultures as a result of natural disaster, but also development and central governance.
Photo courtesy of Sachiko Kazama and MUJIN-TO Production
Unsurprisingly, monumentalizing the moment of destruction and the process of reconstruction is a repeat motif in this exhibition. The most literal depiction of all comes from Tseng Hsiang-chi (曾湘淇), whose paintings show demonic creatures looming over apocalyptic landscapes, confronted by small human figures bathed in light.
The scenes recall Tiananmen’s Tank Man, or the Charging Bull and Fearless Girl statue on New York’s Wall Street. In the artist’s words, they are meant to celebrate the heroes who carry out rescue and reconstruction missions. But the exhibition does its best work when it stays away from such valorization, and goes deep into the trauma and discomfort of catastrophic change.
Photo courtesy of MUJIN-TO Production
On Sept. 1, President William Lai (賴清德) said “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [China] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun? Russia is now at its weakest, right?” “You can ask Russia [for the land back] but you don’t. So it’s obvious they don’t want to invade Taiwan for territorial reasons,” he added. Lai was referencing an 1858 treaty under which, along with an 1860 convention, Russia annexed about one million square kilometers of Manchurian Qing territory in Outer Manchuria, including Haishengwei — today known as
One of my more inexplicable ambitions is to board or alight from a train at every one of the 240 Taiwan Railway Corp stations that offer passenger services. I reckon I’ve still got over 100 to go, but if I live to a ripe old age, I might complete the list. Anyhow, this means that when I took a train to Luye Township (鹿野) in Taitung County a few weeks ago, I felt as if I’d accomplished something as soon as I’d passed the ticket gate. The station is less than 100m east of Highway 9, whereas the most interesting
This month Taiwan received a brutal Christmas present as the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) passed all three of its desired amendments, making recalls of elected officials more difficult, gutting the Constitutional Court and altering the budgetary allocations to local governments. The nation at present has no ultimate authority to determine the constitutionality of government actions, and the local governments, largely controlled by the KMT, have much greater funding. We are staring into an abyss of chaos. The amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法), if they become law (as of this writing President William Lai
Dec. 30 to Jan. 5 Premiering on Jan. 4, 1956, Xue Pinggui and Wang Baochuan (薛平貴與王寶釧) unexpectedly packed theaters for the next 27 days. Taiwan’s first 35mm Hoklo-language (commonly known as Taiwanese) movie beat out the top Hollywood blockbuster, Land of the Pharaohs, and the Mandarin-language Peach Blossom River (桃花江) in box office sales, kicking off a craze that lasted until around 1970. More than 800 Hoklo-language films were made despite government attempts to promote Mandarin. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) owned the nation’s three major production houses, mostly creating Mandarin films filled with anti-communist messages and patriotic propaganda. But most