Pew Yawei (俞雅娓) says Taiwan’s friendliness toward LGBT people is a “magical vibe” and a big part of the reason why the Singaporean has visited Taipei twice in as many months.
During a visit earlier this month, Pew bought magazines and music albums at GinGin Store, a shop specializing in LGBT lifestyle products, and relaxed with the cats at LGBT-friendly H*ours Cafe a few doors down.
“When you’re naturally comfortable, you are drawn to the beauty of the city,” says Pew, who identifies as lesbian.
Photo: Davina Tham, Taipei Times
As the first country in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage, Taiwan stands to gain from the signaling effect this will have on LGBT consumers around the world. Even as entrepreneurs here remain cautiously optimistic of growth driven by LGBT tourism, they are confident that Taiwan’s vibrant, homegrown LGBT culture has much to offer visitors. Just don’t expect the government to help.
A BRANDING OPPORTUNITY
According to a 2017 report on LGBT tourism by the UN World Tourism Organization, marriage equality legislation has become “shorthand for... acceptance of ethnic and sexual minority groups as a whole” and “sends a powerful brand image of tolerance, respect, progress and open-mindedness, resulting in an increase in LGBT visitors, among others.”
Photo courtesy of Liam Campbell
Legalizing marriage equality “absolutely” consolidates the image of Taiwan as an LGBT-friendly destination, says Darien Chen (陳宏昌), regional marketing manager at Atlantis Events, a US company that produces gay and lesbian cruise and resort vacations.
GinGin Store spokesperson James Yang (楊平靖) agrees that taking action to legalize marriage equality resolves ambiguity about Taiwan’s openness toward sexual minorities.
“We have always said that we are number one in Asia in terms of LGBT friendliness, but anyone can call themselves friendly,” Yang says.
Photo: CNA
Taiwan is already enjoying some of these promotional benefits. When the Legislative Yuan approved marriage equality on May 17, the decision generated positive media coverage on a scale that an expensive public relations campaign would struggle to reproduce. The news made headlines around the world and prompted extensive social media mentions, with the hashtag “Taiwan” trending worldwide on Twitter that day.
The Tourism Bureau has reached out to the LGBT market in the past, supporting Taiwan’s parade float at New York’s pride parade last year and inviting European and North American LGBT tourism industry players and media to visit Taiwan in 2012. In 2016, director-general Chou Yung-hui (周永暉) told the media that the Tourism Bureau would continue to cultivate the LGBT market.
Yet although the achievement of marriage equality could be a natural launch pad for more LGBT-focused marketing, the Tourism Bureau appears hesitant to seize the opportunity.
Photo: CNA
When asked ahead of the May 17 legislative session whether marriage equality could untap the economic potential of LGBT tourism, the bureau told the Taipei Times that “across the board, media and industry players whom we have invited in the past have expressed admiration for Taiwan’s local customs, tourist attractions and the openness of public opinion.”
“As for the future development of LGBT issues, we call for positive and open minds to treat hospitably every traveler who comes to Taiwan,” it continued.
The Tourism Bureau also downplayed past outreach to the LGBT market, subsuming its efforts under a general approach to welcome visitors “regardless of race, skin color and sexual orientation.”
Chen takes the broad view that Taiwan’s official tourism promotion lacks a strategy “to propel Taiwan’s story or messages across the world,” and is caught in a “local mindset” that emphasizes cross-promotion between the counties.
Given Taipei’s LGBT scene, which Chen describes as “the most diverse and complete and real gay scene” in Asia, this lack of ambition is a missed opportunity.
TAIPEI’S QUEER ECO-SYSTEM
Taipei distinguishes itself because “most of the gay eco-system is really homegrown and it’s self-sustained,” Chen says.
In contrast, other Asian cities regarded as LGBT destinations may give tourists a good time, but are less conducive places for their own LGBT citizens to live, work and advocate for their own rights.
Elska, a magazine focusing on gay male photography and culture, chose Taipei as the setting of its first issue in Asia in 2016. Editor Liam Campbell, who hails from the UK, says that although Bangkok received the most votes from readers, “those who said ‘Taipei’ also talked about how it was the gayest city in Asia and also the most socially and legally progressive, which really intrigued me.”
GinGin Store, for instance, was a pioneering LGBT establishment in Asia when it opened in 1999. It continues to serve as an informal community hub and representative, accepting invitations to brief the Taipei City Government and schools on LGBT issues and experiences.
There are no industry-wide calculations of the size of Taiwan’s LGBT tourism economy, although Taipei’s pride parade, which drew about 140,000 people last year, offers a glimpse of its potential.
In statements to media after last year’s parade on Oct. 27, Airbnb said that bookings in the greater Taipei area increased by 19 percent in the week leading up to the parade, with most visitors coming from China, Hong Kong, Japan and Singapore. Restaurants and bars in the LGBT haven of Ximending (西門町) also reported a 50 percent increase in business over the week.
Increasingly, activities are designed to coincide with the parade. For the past two years, Wang An-i (王安頤), director of lesbian party and lifestyle brand Lez’s Meeting, has organized a parade after-party. She estimates that 300 out of a thousand partygoers last year were foreigners, with a third coming from Hong Kong.
This synergy extends from Taipei’s pride parade to other LGBT-friendly events in the region. Last month, Atlantis Events’ first cruise to Asia in four years docked overnight at Keelung, en route from Hong Kong to Yokohama. The cruise, carrying about 2,100 guests from the US and Canada, was timed to take place between Bangkok’s Songkran Festival and Tokyo’s pride parade.
And although marriage equality legislation will have no legal effect for non-citizen couples, its mere existence is expected to encourage same-sex couples to hold their commitment ceremonies or honeymoons in Taiwan, bringing business to the local hospitality and wedding industries.
Cities like Sydney and Toronto already host large-scale, weeks-long pride celebrations with various commercial tie-ins, attracting hundreds of thousands of revelers. Even Hong Kong has bid for international exposure, winning the right to host the Gay Games — an LGBT version of the Olympics — in 2022.
With its existing pride parade, abiding and unique LGBT culture, safe and open-minded environment and now marriage equality legislation, Taipei has all the basic elements for the same.
Before last Friday, LGBT activists were in the throes of a struggle for equality. Economic arguments rarely featured in that narrative because of a staunch emphasis on human rights and an aversion to commercialization, which can be a “slippery slope,” Chen says.
“If you even bring up the economic rationale of it then does it mean that everything that has economic benefit then can override human rights?” he explains the thinking of many in the community.
With a historic victory achieved, Taiwan’s LGBT movement will need to decide on its future direction. The extent to which economic power will have a role remains to be seen.
It’s a promising opportunity, but even if encouraging LGBT tourism does not work out, some see a silver lining to staying just under the radar and preserving the qualities that make Taipei liveable.
“Taiwanese people are less economically driven. We’re about the small joys in life,” Chen says. “And that’s the charm.”
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
President William Lai’s (賴清德) March 13 national security speech marked a turning point. He signaled that the government was finally getting serious about a whole-of-society approach to defending the nation. The presidential office summarized his speech succinctly: “President Lai introduced 17 major strategies to respond to five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces: China’s threat to national sovereignty, its threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting Taiwan’s military, its threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan, its threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges, and its threats from
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at