Dec.10 to Dec.16
After several setbacks — including falling off a donkey and injuring his arm — Lin Hsien-tang (林獻堂) finally set out from Keelung on May 15, 1927 with his second son in tow. With his oldest son studying in London, Lin felt that this was the best time to fulfill his longtime dream of visiting Europe and the US.
Lin, a prominent political activist under Japanese colonial rule, was urged by his comrades not to take the trip. It was a crucial moment for Taiwan’s autonomy movement, as Lin’s faction had just quit the leftist-dominated Taiwanese Cultural Association (臺灣文化協會) in January, and was planning to form Taiwan’s first political party.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Lin writes in his diary that it was now or never for his journey, departing just two weeks before his associate and revered democracy pioneer Chiang Wei-shui (蔣渭水) founded what would become the Taiwanese People’s Party (台灣民眾黨).
Lin spent 378 days visiting more than 16 countries and 60 cities. His detailed travel accounts first appeared in the Chinese-language newspaper Taiwan Minpao (台灣民報) in August 1927, and ran until October 1931. Lin attempted to turn the material into a book, but died midway through the editing, leaving his secretary Yeh Jung-chung (葉榮鐘) to finish compiling Lin Hsien-tang’s Travel Writings from around the Globe (林獻堂環球遊記).
EMULATING THE WEST
Photo courtesy of National Central Library
Lin was heavily influenced by the travel accounts of Qing Dynasty scholar and reformist Liang Qichao (梁啟超), who fled China after his failed efforts to modernize the nation. When the two met in Japan in 1907, Lin asked Liang for his opinion on the future of Taiwan.
Liang suggested that Lin emulate the Irish struggle against British rule. This idea of taking inspiration from other countries’ experiences undoubtedly fueled Lin’s desire to see the West for himself.
Liang visited Taiwan in 1911 and further advised Lin to expand his horizons beyond literature, to closely study politics, economics and social thought.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Lin was one of the few Taiwanese who had the money and status to travel to the West, but he was not the first to write about his experiences.
Huang Chao-chin (黃朝琴), who would become Taipei’s first mayor under Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) rule, studied at the University of Illinois in 1923 and also published an account of his travels in Taiwan Minpao.
Yan Kuo-nien (顏國年), a wealthy businessman from New Taipei City’s Rueifang District (瑞芳), set out from Keelung in 1925 but took the opposite route from Lin, heading east to the US first, circumnavigating the globe in about 220 days.
Photo courtesy of digitalarchives.tw
According to the book The Traveler’s State of Mind (旅人心境) by Lin Shu-hui (林淑慧), Yan’s account largely contains matter-of-fact observations of the economic, industrial and material development of the countries he visited. In contrast, Lin’s humorous and introspective prose focuses on values such as freedom and equality. This makes sense when considering their goals — Yan wanted to expand his coal-mining empire, while Lin had dedicated his life to the struggle for Taiwanese consciousness and autonomy.
“Lin’s prose reflected his deep feelings toward living under colonial rule,” Lin Shu-hui writes.
However, Yan’s book was meant for family and friends and was not widely publicized, whereas Lin’s book had “considerable influence” on Taiwan’s social and political movements, writes historian Hsu Hsueh-chi (許雪姬) in her introduction to the 2015 edition of Lin’s book.
“Lin was not a typical tourist… He hoped to learn about the strengths of Europe and the US to help Taiwan,” Hsu writes.
SOCIAL AND POLITICAL COMMENTARY
Lin’s first stop was Xiamen, followed by Hong Kong, Malaysia and Sri Lanka. He reached Europe on June 17, 1927, after riding camels and touring the pyramids in Egypt. He spent considerable time in London and Paris, using the latter as a base from which he explored the surrounding countries. It was from Paris that Lin set out on March 14, 1928, reaching New York in a week. After crossing the continental US, he returned to Asia via San Francisco. Although long-distance travel was mostly done by train and ship in those days, Lin jumped at the chance to take a plane for the first time in Los Angeles.
It’s impossible to cover all of Lin’s detailed and thoughtful observations. Probably the most interesting part is the social commentary that he provides, which closely mirrored his ideals as a political activist.
One notable passage is the one on the status of women in the US, which Lin thought was the highest in the world: “When a man meets another man in the street, they just nod to each other; whereas they will take off their hat when encountering a woman… If a woman enters a packed streetcar, the men will stand up and let her sit. It’s not just like this with the upper class, but throughout society. This is why there’s the saying, ‘To measure how civilized a country is, one just needs to look at how their women are treated.’”
Lin also muses on the prevalence of lynching black people in the US, writing: “It’s hard to believe that such inhumane practices are still taking place in plain sight in the 20th century.”
In the UK, he visited the execution site of Charles I, commenting: “He went against the will of the people and insisted on authoritarianism, and ended up losing his head. I wonder how many people in power around the world are still making the same mistake as Charles I? It’s so hard to comprehend!”
Lin does not make explicit his envy toward the intense debates at Speakers’ Corner in London’s Hyde Park, but it’s apparent in his prose: “After each speech, the crowd of thousands roar in applause. Four or five policemen can be seen, but they do not interfere. What freedom of speech they enjoy!”
Lin’s musings after visiting Monaco perhaps encapsulate his feelings as part of a colonized people: “Even though Monaco has little land, people and production, it’s ruled competently. This shows that there is no territory and no people in the world that cannot be independent. The only thing that matters is the people’s ability to govern themselves. If they can’t, then even a country as large and bountiful as India will be reduced to a colony.”
The book is truly a fascinating read and paints a picture of Lin that may be hard to glean from other historical materials. Unfortunately, it’s not available in English.
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
On the final approach to Lanshan Workstation (嵐山工作站), logging trains crossed one last gully over a dramatic double bridge, taking the left line to enter the locomotive shed or the right line to continue straight through, heading deeper into the Central Mountains. Today, hikers have to scramble down a steep slope into this gully and pass underneath the rails, still hanging eerily in the air even after the bridge’s supports collapsed long ago. It is the final — but not the most dangerous — challenge of a tough two-day hike in. Back when logging was still underway, it was a quick,
From censoring “poisonous books” to banning “poisonous languages,” the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) tried hard to stamp out anything that might conflict with its agenda during its almost 40 years of martial law. To mark 228 Peace Memorial Day, which commemorates the anti-government uprising in 1947, which was violently suppressed, I visited two exhibitions detailing censorship in Taiwan: “Silenced Pages” (禁書時代) at the National 228 Memorial Museum and “Mandarin Monopoly?!” (請說國語) at the National Human Rights Museum. In both cases, the authorities framed their targets as “evils that would threaten social mores, national stability and their anti-communist cause, justifying their actions
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislative caucus convener Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) and some in the deep blue camp seem determined to ensure many of the recall campaigns against their lawmakers succeed. Widely known as the “King of Hualien,” Fu also appears to have become the king of the KMT. In theory, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) outranks him, but Han is supposed to be even-handed in negotiations between party caucuses — the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) says he is not — and Fu has been outright ignoring Han. Party Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) isn’t taking the lead on anything while Fu
There is a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plot to put millions at the mercy of the CCP using just released AI technology. This isn’t being overly dramatic. The speed at which AI is improving is exponential as AI improves itself, and we are unprepared for this because we have never experienced anything like this before. For example, a few months ago music videos made on home computers began appearing with AI-generated people and scenes in them that were pretty impressive, but the people would sprout extra arms and fingers, food would inexplicably fly off plates into mouths and text on
RSS