Ian Holliday says the jailing of two Reuters reporters investigating the deaths of 10 Rohinga by security forces has become a public relations disaster for Aung San Suu Kyi and the National League for Democracy (NLD) and doesn’t bode well for the future of Myanmar’s liberalization.
“She’s boxed herself into a corner,” Holliday, the vice-president of the University of Hong Kong (Teaching and Learning) and a Myanmar specialist, tells the Taipei Times. “The rule of law has always been her mantra, and she’s said this case is strictly for the courts. Once she’s taken a position, she’s extremely reluctant to change her mind. Here she’s said publicly that the journalists were jailed because the courts decided they broke the law. She’s also said their conviction has nothing to do with freedom of expression.”
Holliday will be in Taipei on Saturday when he will give a lecture, Liberalism and Democracy in Myanmar, as part of the Lung Ying-tai Cultural Foundation’s Taipei Salon series of talks by international speakers. Lung Ying-tai (龍應台), former culture minister and a professor at Hong Kong University, will moderate the talk.
Photo courtesy of Thukhuma Collection, thukhuma.org
DOMESTIC PRESSURE
The case highlights the extreme pressure at home and abroad that Aung San Suu Kyi is under as she continues to implement reforms. In addition to international pressure, she is aware that the military could tire of politicians and assume full power again.
“The 2008 constitution has an entire chapter on provisions for a state of emergency, which allows for a military takeover if national solidarity or national sovereignty are threatened,” Holliday says.
Photo Courtesy of Ian Holliday
But a “power grab” by the military is unlikely, he adds, because sharing power with the NLD has worked out very well for the generals. Which raises a question: can she use her, admittedly diminishing, moral authority and work behind the scenes to free the journalists and deal with the Rohinga crisis?
“Maybe she tried and failed — we don’t know. Taking a public stand against the military on the Rohingya issue would be immensely courageous — and politically suicidal, given that the Myanmar people are strongly anti-Rohingya,” Holliday says.
‘LIMITED LIBERALISM’
Photo courtesy of Thukhuma Collection, thukhuma.org
Holliday’s talk will examine Myanmar’s prospects for liberal democracy, a process that involves examining the experience of democratic consolidation in other countries, drawing on their historical legacies, constitutional provisions, key actors and commitment to dealing with an authoritarian past.
“Myanmar has a political culture that is partly liberal, partly illiberal and partly limited liberal — meaning that on some issues people hold inconsistent beliefs. They may think that democracy is good, but so too is military rule. They may hold that political rights should be exercised by all, but not by the Rohingya,” he says.
Holliday adds that the numbers of liberals in the country have stagnated, while those with illiberal and limited liberal beliefs are growing. “In these circumstances, a hybrid regime devised by former military rulers, in which power is shared between an elected government and an entrenched military machine, seems likely to remain in place for some time to come,” he says. “There could even be a slide back into autocracy.”
The talk will conclude ways to strengthen Myanmar’s democracy.
ART AND EDUCATION
For Holliday, Myanmar is more than just an academic interest. While traveling in Thailand in December 2007 to help displaced populations, he visited a number of schools on the Thai-Myanmar border and learned that their students needed help with English. The following summer he launched the Migrant Outreach Education Initiative program, which saw 22 students from University of Hong Kong travel to Thailand to deliver six weeks of intensive English classes to 700 refugees and migrants in 11 schools.
The following year they started a program in Cambodia and in 2011 another in Myanmar. They’ve also offered programs in China.
“Teachers get a chance to engage in meaningful service learning. Many of them form a strong bond with their students and return to teach again in their schools,” he said, adding that the goal is to help students develop confidence with English.
Holliday also has one of the world’s largest collections of art from Myanmar — over 1,000 works by over 100 artists. He began collecting in 2010 when the country was transitioning from military rule to a quasi-democracy.
In an interview last summer with ArtAsiaPacific, Holliday said that before the transition he couldn’t do scientific research in the country — “all you could do was sniff the air,” he told the art magazine.
Holliday said that political civil society and artistic civil society often overlapped because they were so small.
“If you sat down with civil-society leaders, you were often talking to painters,” he said.
Holliday’s motivation to collect art, which predominately consists of paintings, was that he wanted another view into the psyche of a population that is representing their ideas after 50 of military rule.
“After such a long period of isolation, people want the country to succeed and come back into the embrace of the modern world. But that’s only going to happen if we do that on a basis of understanding rather than ignorance. There are multiple ways we can do it, and I believe paintings are one way,” Holliday said.
His collection, which he eventually plans to donate to an institution, has enabled Myanmar art to reach a broader audience with traveling shows to the US and UK.
And what of the Reuters journalists?
“I think that eventually the appeal will have to find in favor of the journalists, or there will have to be a presidential pardon — everyone knows this is an issue Myanmar has to resolve if it’s to continue with its rehabilitation in international society. Media freedom is worse under the NLD than it was under the [Union Solidarity and Development Party] — that’s not likely to change,” he says.
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
President William Lai’s (賴清德) March 13 national security speech marked a turning point. He signaled that the government was finally getting serious about a whole-of-society approach to defending the nation. The presidential office summarized his speech succinctly: “President Lai introduced 17 major strategies to respond to five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces: China’s threat to national sovereignty, its threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting Taiwan’s military, its threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan, its threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges, and its threats from
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
RSS