Ian Holliday says the jailing of two Reuters reporters investigating the deaths of 10 Rohinga by security forces has become a public relations disaster for Aung San Suu Kyi and the National League for Democracy (NLD) and doesn’t bode well for the future of Myanmar’s liberalization.
“She’s boxed herself into a corner,” Holliday, the vice-president of the University of Hong Kong (Teaching and Learning) and a Myanmar specialist, tells the Taipei Times. “The rule of law has always been her mantra, and she’s said this case is strictly for the courts. Once she’s taken a position, she’s extremely reluctant to change her mind. Here she’s said publicly that the journalists were jailed because the courts decided they broke the law. She’s also said their conviction has nothing to do with freedom of expression.”
Holliday will be in Taipei on Saturday when he will give a lecture, Liberalism and Democracy in Myanmar, as part of the Lung Ying-tai Cultural Foundation’s Taipei Salon series of talks by international speakers. Lung Ying-tai (龍應台), former culture minister and a professor at Hong Kong University, will moderate the talk.
Photo courtesy of Thukhuma Collection, thukhuma.org
DOMESTIC PRESSURE
The case highlights the extreme pressure at home and abroad that Aung San Suu Kyi is under as she continues to implement reforms. In addition to international pressure, she is aware that the military could tire of politicians and assume full power again.
“The 2008 constitution has an entire chapter on provisions for a state of emergency, which allows for a military takeover if national solidarity or national sovereignty are threatened,” Holliday says.
Photo Courtesy of Ian Holliday
But a “power grab” by the military is unlikely, he adds, because sharing power with the NLD has worked out very well for the generals. Which raises a question: can she use her, admittedly diminishing, moral authority and work behind the scenes to free the journalists and deal with the Rohinga crisis?
“Maybe she tried and failed — we don’t know. Taking a public stand against the military on the Rohingya issue would be immensely courageous — and politically suicidal, given that the Myanmar people are strongly anti-Rohingya,” Holliday says.
‘LIMITED LIBERALISM’
Photo courtesy of Thukhuma Collection, thukhuma.org
Holliday’s talk will examine Myanmar’s prospects for liberal democracy, a process that involves examining the experience of democratic consolidation in other countries, drawing on their historical legacies, constitutional provisions, key actors and commitment to dealing with an authoritarian past.
“Myanmar has a political culture that is partly liberal, partly illiberal and partly limited liberal — meaning that on some issues people hold inconsistent beliefs. They may think that democracy is good, but so too is military rule. They may hold that political rights should be exercised by all, but not by the Rohingya,” he says.
Holliday adds that the numbers of liberals in the country have stagnated, while those with illiberal and limited liberal beliefs are growing. “In these circumstances, a hybrid regime devised by former military rulers, in which power is shared between an elected government and an entrenched military machine, seems likely to remain in place for some time to come,” he says. “There could even be a slide back into autocracy.”
The talk will conclude ways to strengthen Myanmar’s democracy.
ART AND EDUCATION
For Holliday, Myanmar is more than just an academic interest. While traveling in Thailand in December 2007 to help displaced populations, he visited a number of schools on the Thai-Myanmar border and learned that their students needed help with English. The following summer he launched the Migrant Outreach Education Initiative program, which saw 22 students from University of Hong Kong travel to Thailand to deliver six weeks of intensive English classes to 700 refugees and migrants in 11 schools.
The following year they started a program in Cambodia and in 2011 another in Myanmar. They’ve also offered programs in China.
“Teachers get a chance to engage in meaningful service learning. Many of them form a strong bond with their students and return to teach again in their schools,” he said, adding that the goal is to help students develop confidence with English.
Holliday also has one of the world’s largest collections of art from Myanmar — over 1,000 works by over 100 artists. He began collecting in 2010 when the country was transitioning from military rule to a quasi-democracy.
In an interview last summer with ArtAsiaPacific, Holliday said that before the transition he couldn’t do scientific research in the country — “all you could do was sniff the air,” he told the art magazine.
Holliday said that political civil society and artistic civil society often overlapped because they were so small.
“If you sat down with civil-society leaders, you were often talking to painters,” he said.
Holliday’s motivation to collect art, which predominately consists of paintings, was that he wanted another view into the psyche of a population that is representing their ideas after 50 of military rule.
“After such a long period of isolation, people want the country to succeed and come back into the embrace of the modern world. But that’s only going to happen if we do that on a basis of understanding rather than ignorance. There are multiple ways we can do it, and I believe paintings are one way,” Holliday said.
His collection, which he eventually plans to donate to an institution, has enabled Myanmar art to reach a broader audience with traveling shows to the US and UK.
And what of the Reuters journalists?
“I think that eventually the appeal will have to find in favor of the journalists, or there will have to be a presidential pardon — everyone knows this is an issue Myanmar has to resolve if it’s to continue with its rehabilitation in international society. Media freedom is worse under the NLD than it was under the [Union Solidarity and Development Party] — that’s not likely to change,” he says.
Last week saw the appearance of another odious screed full of lies from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) Ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian (肖千), in the Financial Review, a major Australian paper. Xiao’s piece was presented without challenge or caveat. His “Seven truths on why Taiwan always will be China’s” presented a “greatest hits” of the litany of PRC falsehoods. This includes: Taiwan’s indigenous peoples were descended from the people of China 30,000 years ago; a “Chinese” imperial government administrated Taiwan in the 14th century; Koxinga, also known as Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功), “recovered” Taiwan for China; the Qing owned
In Taiwan’s politics the party chair is an extremely influential position. Typically this person is the presumed presidential candidate or serving president. In the last presidential election, two of the three candidates were also leaders of their party. Only one party chair race had been planned for this year, but with the Jan. 1 resignation by the currently indicted Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) two parties are now in play. If a challenger to acting Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) appears we will examine that race in more depth. Currently their election is set for Feb. 15. EXTREMELY
Jan. 20 to Jan. 26 Taipei was in a jubilant, patriotic mood on the morning of Jan. 25, 1954. Flags hung outside shops and residences, people chanted anti-communist slogans and rousing music blared from loudspeakers. The occasion was the arrival of about 14,000 Chinese prisoners from the Korean War, who had elected to head to Taiwan instead of being repatriated to China. The majority landed in Keelung over three days and were paraded through the capital to great fanfare. Air Force planes dropped colorful flyers, one of which read, “You’re back, you’re finally back. You finally overcame the evil communist bandits and
They increasingly own everything from access to space to how we get news on Earth and now outgoing President Joe Biden warns America’s new breed of Donald Trump-allied oligarchs could gobble up US democracy itself. Biden used his farewell speech to the nation to deliver a shockingly dark message: that a nation which has always revered its entrepreneurs may now be at their mercy. “An oligarchy is taking shape in America of extreme wealth, power and influence that literally threatens our entire democracy, our basic rights and freedoms,” Biden said. He named no names, but his targets were clear: men like Elon Musk