Dutch national theater company Toneelgroep Amsterdam (TGA) is returning to Taipei this weekend after a two-year hiatus to close the Taipei International Arts Festival.
The troupe, led by its avant-garde artistic director Ivo van Hove, is to perform its thought-provoking, four-hour-long production adapted by Koen Tachelet from the novel The Fountainhead by controversial American author and philosopher Ayn Rand.
A play containing grand ideas about society and the relationship between the individual and the collective, the story follows Howard Roark, played by poet, actor and former Dutch “poet of the fatherland” Ramsey Nasr, who for this production learned to sketch architectural designs in the style of US architect Frank Lloyd Wright.
Photo courtesy of Jan Versweyveld and TGA
An ambitious and virtuous architect, Roark is willing to bear the ultimate sacrifice for his ideas: To forgo friendship and love, to be rejected by society and, ultimately, to destroy his own creation for the integrity of his architectural ideal.
This lonely process acquires another dimension when the protagonist meets Dominique Francon, powerfully played by lead actress Halina Reijn, who manifests herself as a kindred spirit as well as a formidable opponent in a relationship that is alternately creative and destructive — and which receives much attention in this stage rendering.
Since her breakthrough with The Fountainhead in 1943, Rand and her following have been a force to reckon with, where the author — who preached a philosophy of extreme rational self-interest dubbed Objectivism and reportedly features prominently on the reading shelves of US President Donald Trump and Speaker of the House of Representatives Paul Ryan — is in equal measures admired and reviled.
However, no such politically laden history of controversy exists in the Netherlands, where TGA staged the novel, which is not as widely read in Europe, but has inspired generations of architects and artists.
This has allowed the director to approach the material with fresh eyes, resulting in a play that conveys the full emotional depth of the story, but does not eschew giving Rand’s ideas full stage, whether through archetypal characters that personify the ideas at war in the story or a powerfully rendered double monologue that receives full stage, a flourish that, contrary to the novelist’s original, gives equal voice to both sides of the ethical dilemma facing the architect.
Dutch daily NRC Handelsblad said Van Hove has managed to keep a precariously balanced perspective, “cautiously guiding Rand past the abyss of her own ideology.”
The production is designed by Jan Versweyveld, who has cooperated with Van Hove on a series of high profile plays in recent years. While grand-scale designs do not always benefit a play’s intimacy, Versweyveld’s visually rich multimedia approach and spectacular stage are ideally suited to a story that combines ideas, intrigue and architectural design.
Live music is performed onstage and scenes are projected on a large screen, allowing the audience to follow the process of architectural creation.
The play is performed in Dutch, with English and Chinese surtitles, runs for four hours with an intermission and includes “adult content” — nudity, smoking and blood scenes.
Pre-talks are held 30 minutes before every performance in the theater’s lobby, with a post-show talk after the matinee on Sunday.
On Jan. 17, Beijing announced that it would allow residents of Shanghai and Fujian Province to visit Taiwan. The two sides are still working out the details. President William Lai (賴清德) has been promoting cross-strait tourism, perhaps to soften the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) attitudes, perhaps as a sop to international and local opinion leaders. Likely the latter, since many observers understand that the twin drivers of cross-strait tourism — the belief that Chinese tourists will bring money into Taiwan, and the belief that tourism will create better relations — are both false. CHINESE TOURISM PIPE DREAM Back in July
Could Taiwan’s democracy be at risk? There is a lot of apocalyptic commentary right now suggesting that this is the case, but it is always a conspiracy by the other guys — our side is firmly on the side of protecting democracy and always has been, unlike them! The situation is nowhere near that bleak — yet. The concern is that the power struggle between the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and their now effectively pan-blue allies the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) intensifies to the point where democratic functions start to break down. Both
Taiwan doesn’t have a lot of railways, but its network has plenty of history. The government-owned entity that last year became the Taiwan Railway Corp (TRC) has been operating trains since 1891. During the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule, the colonial government made huge investments in rail infrastructure. The northern port city of Keelung was connected to Kaohsiung in the south. New lines appeared in Pingtung, Yilan and the Hualien-Taitung region. Railway enthusiasts exploring Taiwan will find plenty to amuse themselves. Taipei will soon gain its second rail-themed museum. Elsewhere there’s a number of endearing branch lines and rolling-stock collections, some
This was not supposed to be an election year. The local media is billing it as the “2025 great recall era” (2025大罷免時代) or the “2025 great recall wave” (2025大罷免潮), with many now just shortening it to “great recall.” As of this writing the number of campaigns that have submitted the requisite one percent of eligible voters signatures in legislative districts is 51 — 35 targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus lawmakers and 16 targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers. The pan-green side has more as they started earlier. Many recall campaigns are billing themselves as “Winter Bluebirds” after the “Bluebird Action”
RSS