Cyril Guedmadingar faces being torn from his family — and the only country he has ever really known. The Russian national wants to stay in Taiwan after high-school graduation and find a job, but the law will not allow him to do so.
Guedmadingar, 18, has lived in Taiwan for 11 years on a dependency visa through his mother, who has an Alien Permanent Residency Certificate (APRC). Since permanent residency is not extended to the immediate family, Guedmadingar can remain in Taiwan as a dependent until he is 26, but cannot work.
“We’re sort of panicking,” his mother Marina says. “He doesn’t want to leave. His entire life is here.”
Photo courtesy of Ralph Jensen
Foreigners not married to Taiwanese could only become permanent residents in 2002, and the problems their children face have only surfaced in recent years as they come of age. Having grown up here, many view themselves as Taiwanese, but do not have citizenship — even if they were born here. They will still have to leave when they are 26, as they cannot become permanent residents because there is a salary requirement.
BARRED FROM WORKING
Now a senior at Yu Da High School of Commerce and Home Economics (育達商職), Guedmadingar’s troubles began when he found work at a restaurant to fulfill the school’s internship requirement.
Photo courtesy of Cyril Guedmadingar
“I worked there for one day, and they asked my school for my work permit,” he says.
He didn’t have one because of his status, and the restaurant told him he could not come back. Luckily, the school gave him the credits anyway so that he could graduate, but he is still unable to work.
Guedmadingar has considered giving up his Russian passport to apply for Taiwanese citizenship, but is not legally able do so until he turns 20, which is next December. But even then, there are strict requirements that are difficult to meet.
Other individuals, such as Andres Jensen, a German-Polish national born in Taiwan, are experiencing similar problems. Also 18, the clock is ticking for Jensen, whose two older siblings have already unwillingly left Taiwan. Jensen is upset that his family was forced to separate, but he’s even more worried about his future.
“I don’t speak German well, and I can’t survive if I go to [Germany],” he says. “It’s kind of sad to realize that Taiwan is my home, but my home doesn’t want me ... I just want to receive a normal salary and live a normal life.”
RESTRICTIVE MEASURES
Attorney Michael Fahey of Taipei-based Winkler Partners says the government didn’t take into consideration the children of permanent residents enacting the new rules.
“It never occurred to them that years later you have people who have children who are growing up,” Fahey says. “The system is not designed to take care of them.”
Although the National Immigration Agency doesn’t track the number of these dependents, Fahey estimates that there are no more than 500.
Fahey partners with Forward Taiwan to work with the government on policy that would help attract and retain foreign talent, and resolving the problems faced by dependents is part of the bigger picture.
Legislators such as Jason Hsu (許毓仁) have taken up the issue, and the National Development Council is drafting a special act for foreign professionals including the residence status of their children, which will be finalized this month at the earliest. It will still have to go through the public hearings before it’s submitted to the legislature.
Andres’s father, Ralph, will be watching carefully, as this is not the first time his family’s plight has received attention. In fact, a 2014 amendment to extend dependency visas was nicknamed the “Krystyna Jensen Act” (雷提娜條款), as it was in response to his daughter’s story of graduating from National Taiwan University of the Arts and being forced to leave because she could not obtain a work permit as a dancer and performer.
The law was enacted so she could stay — but being unable to work, she left anyway. Ralph says the solution would be to have the rights of permanent residents extend to the immediate family.
Fahey is “cautiously optimistic” about the proposed act, but is worried that it will still restrict permanent residency applicants to Class A professional and technical work so that only people who are university graduates will be able to make use of it.
“They need to keep in mind the diversity of these people,” Fahey says.
“It’s true that some of them go to college and do something that allows them to get a job in the technical field. But many of them do other things,” he adds.
And even those who attend college in Taiwan have limited options. Recent laws have made it easier for foreign graduates of Taiwanese universities to receive work permits, but it must be a Class A position. Fahey adds that it would be difficult for them to earn a salary that would qualify for permanent residency.
Guedmadingar may have no problem giving up his passport, but many feel that it is unfair that Taiwan allows its own citizens to be dual nationals while restricting foreigners. In addition, one has to forfeit their passport first, then apply for Taiwanese citizenship — which makes many uncomfortable as there’s a chance they end up stateless.
There is one final less-than-ideal option: Apply for the dependency extension, work illegally and hope things work themselves out.
This is what Kevin (last name withheld to protect his identity) has been doing. Born and raised in Taiwan, Kevin is the only one among his siblings who was young enough to benefit from the 2014 amendment. The rest all left when they turned 20.
“You give them an ARC [Alien Residence Certificate] and they can’t work. You’re basically telling them that you don’t want them in this country,” Kevin says. “I’m working illegally because … that’s what they’ve forced me to do.”
RETAINING TALENT
Fahey believes that diverse talent is the “secret sauce” for Taiwan to transform into a knowledge-based economy, and that controlled immigration is an important part of the solution to the country’s demographic crisis and shrinking workforce.
As such, Taiwan will benefit from retaining these bilingual and bicultural people.
Furthermore, the difficulty of raising a family here will become a deterrent for more experienced professionals, which is the kind of talent that Taiwan wants.
Andres Jensen says that he has met several people in Germany who say they want to move to Taiwan but don’t due to the difficulties with raising a family. And his parents have five or six friends who left after they had children because they didn’t want to deal with the uncertain situation.
Fahey says that in addition to attracting high-level professional talent, the government should focus on people who are already in Taiwan.
“Otherwise they will leave and tell people not to come,” he says. “A lot of people are saying that Taiwan is a great place to live if you’re 20 or 30. But if you have a family it’s not so great … If we have a happy international community, then we will be more likely to attract some of the people they want.”
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
Mirror mirror on the wall, what’s the fairest Disney live-action remake of them all? Wait, mirror. Hold on a second. Maybe choosing from the likes of Alice in Wonderland (2010), Mulan (2020) and The Lion King (2019) isn’t such a good idea. Mirror, on second thought, what’s on Netflix? Even the most devoted fans would have to acknowledge that these have not been the most illustrious illustrations of Disney magic. At their best (Pete’s Dragon? Cinderella?) they breathe life into old classics that could use a little updating. At their worst, well, blue Will Smith. Given the rapacious rate of remakes in modern
RSS