When it was announced that Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) won the presidential election last month, supporters crowded her national campaign headquarters in celebration.
In addition to being elected Taiwan’s first female president, Tsai’s victory is especially significant for the country’s lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community. Unlike other candidates and all former presidents, she will be the first Taiwanese president ever to publicly support same-sex marriage.
A NEW PRESIDENT
Photo courtesy of Tsai Ing-wen’s national campaign headquarters
Tsai’s LGBT-friendly position was summed up last month in a headline by news outlet Quartz: “Taiwan’s new president is a female academic who loves cats and supports gay rights.” Before the Taiwan LGBT Pride Parade in Taipei last year, she publicly declared support for marriage equality to boost parade’s visibility and momentum. With her popularity and influence, Tsai should make a positive impact on Taiwan’s gay rights movement.
It would be naive, however, to view Tsai’s victory as a panacea for the LGBT community. In light of the fact that DPP caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘), as well as some DPP legislators, has repeatedly blocked a draft bill for marriage equality, it is hardly surprising that the Collective of Sex Workers and Supporters (日日春關懷互助協會) asked: “Does Tsai really speak for the DPP [on the issue]?”
Tsai has also been called “water spinach” ( 空心菜, kongxincai), a hollow-stemmed vegetable, for failing to propose substantial policy ideas (“Tsai” is homophonous with cai, 菜, vegetable). Though the transition of executive power doesn’t take place until May, she has yet to propose any concrete LGBT policies, so the gay community should not soley rely on her support.
photo: Su Ching-feng, Taipei Times
A NEW PARTY
The legislative election was held on the same day as the presidential election. The emergence of the Faith and Hope League (信心希望聯盟, FHL) party reveals how contentious marriage equality remains in Taiwan. Unlike other parties, the FHL ran on a conservative platform that specifically targeted LGBT rights.
The party was established in September of last year for the purpose of building a “Christian political platform.” But the eight legislative candidates it nominated failed to gain any seats, receiving 1.7 percent of the vote — a low figure, but suggests that there is still significance opposition to the idea.
During its campaign, the FHL pledged to protect “traditional family values” by pushing for a referendum against the legalization of same-sex marriage. With the help of Christian teachers, it controversially distributed petitions to elementary and secondary school students, who were told to have their parents sign the forms.
For example, the student bulletin of National Taichung Girls’ Senior High School (台中女中) reported last month that members of the FHL were distributing petitions at the school’s sports games, warning students not to be brainwashed by LGBT people.
“Taiwan is a free and democratic society, and Taiwanese enjoy the freedom of expression and the right to participate in politics through referenda,” the bulletin stated. “But it is outrageous when the right is misused to oppress others,” raising the question of who is being oppressed?
A NEW LEGISLATURE
In another sign that there is still much that needs to be done for LGBT rights, 12 legislators, including Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator Lu Hsueh-chang (呂學樟), a former Judiciary Committee convener who said that homosexuals are “scary” and that legalizing same-sex marriage is encouraging “bestiality,” stood for the election. Although they failed to be nominated or reelected, they are still on the political scene.
However, today close to 40 of Taiwan’s 113 legislators support same-sex marriage — a new high. This means that the LGBT community may have a better chance to put the draft bill for marriage equality on the legislative agenda in the new legislature.
Despite continued opposition to gay rights, it is encouraging to see an LGBT-friendly president and legislature. With the victory in both the presidential and legislative elections, perhaps Taiwan’s LGBT community will finally achieve the same rights they have been denied for so long.
Feb. 17 to Feb. 23 “Japanese city is bombed,” screamed the banner in bold capital letters spanning the front page of the US daily New Castle News on Feb. 24, 1938. This was big news across the globe, as Japan had not been bombarded since Western forces attacked Shimonoseki in 1864. “Numerous Japanese citizens were killed and injured today when eight Chinese planes bombed Taihoku, capital of Formosa, and other nearby cities in the first Chinese air raid anywhere in the Japanese empire,” the subhead clarified. The target was the Matsuyama Airfield (today’s Songshan Airport in Taipei), which
On Jan. 17, Beijing announced that it would allow residents of Shanghai and Fujian Province to visit Taiwan. The two sides are still working out the details. President William Lai (賴清德) has been promoting cross-strait tourism, perhaps to soften the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) attitudes, perhaps as a sop to international and local opinion leaders. Likely the latter, since many observers understand that the twin drivers of cross-strait tourism — the belief that Chinese tourists will bring money into Taiwan, and the belief that tourism will create better relations — are both false. CHINESE TOURISM PIPE DREAM Back in July
Could Taiwan’s democracy be at risk? There is a lot of apocalyptic commentary right now suggesting that this is the case, but it is always a conspiracy by the other guys — our side is firmly on the side of protecting democracy and always has been, unlike them! The situation is nowhere near that bleak — yet. The concern is that the power struggle between the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and their now effectively pan-blue allies the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) intensifies to the point where democratic functions start to break down. Both
This was not supposed to be an election year. The local media is billing it as the “2025 great recall era” (2025大罷免時代) or the “2025 great recall wave” (2025大罷免潮), with many now just shortening it to “great recall.” As of this writing the number of campaigns that have submitted the requisite one percent of eligible voters signatures in legislative districts is 51 — 35 targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus lawmakers and 16 targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers. The pan-green side has more as they started earlier. Many recall campaigns are billing themselves as “Winter Bluebirds” after the “Bluebird Action”
RSS