It was the day after the Ma-Xi meeting — the historic meeting in Singapore between Taiwanese President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and the first time that the top leaders from both sides of the Taiwan Strait have met in person — that I spoke with Hong Kong activist Jason Ng. The lawyer-turned-best-selling-author was signing books at the Arts House in Singapore where he was a featured speaker at the Singapore Writers Festival.
“In Hong Kong, the media calls it the Xi-Ma meeting,” Ng tells me.
Donning thick-rimmed glasses and a form-fitting navy blue vest over a neatly-pressed shirt and red tie, Ng’s soft-spoken, scholarly demeanor belies the fact that he’s one of Hong Kong’s most outspoken activists. In addition to being chosen as Hong Kong’s “Man of the Year” by Elle Men magazine in 2011 and participating in the “Umbrella movement” last year, Ng is also a columnist for the South China Morning Post and the author of the popular blog, As I See It, where he muses about Hong Kong’s most pressing social and political issues.
Photo: Dana Ter, Taipei Times
Ng says that the label, “Xi-Ma meeting,” is an indication of the amount of influence that China has come to exert over the media in Hong Kong. He adds that the perceived lack of a reliable press — especially the Chinese-language press — has led many Hong Kong residents to turn to blogs and social media for other perspectives on politics and current affairs.
BATTLE OF THE WITS, SORT OF
Earlier that day, Ng had spoken about citizen journalism at a panel discussion at the Singapore Writers Festival entitled “Tweet for Change,” which touched upon different ways that authors and journalists can use social media effectively. While he largely applauds social media for having the power to reach a mass audience in a shorter amount of time — he admits that his own blog has a wider readership than his articles because blogging is faster and more up-to-date — there’s still much to be wary of.
Photo courtesy of Jason Ng
Like the other panelists — also best-selling authors all of whom maintain a strong online presence — Ng believes that 140-character tweets and powerful images on Instagram have only fed into people’s short attention spans more.
“The problem is that whoever has a wittier phrase wins because someone who actually has a point to make may not be as creative,” he says.
Although it’s arguable that social media helped to rally support for social movements such as the “Umbrella movement,” Ng is skeptical of how much tangible progress is made when people are simply sitting at home and typing a few words or changing their profile pictures on Facebook.
Photo courtesy of Jason Ng
Then, there’s a new crop of commentators who keep the snide remarks rolling.
“The political environment in Hong Kong is so toxic these days, that after I post something, there will be a response after 10 seconds — it’s like, did you even read the article?” Ng says, to which the audience snickers.
THE TAIWAN CONNECTION
Speaking with Ng in person, he expresses a deep concern about the future of Hong Kong’s democracy. With the one year anniversary of the conclusion of the “Umbrella movement” coming up, Beijing has only continued to exert its own political agenda on the former British colony.
And with Taiwan’s presidential election next month, Taiwanese have a lot on their minds too. When I tell Ng that people in Taiwan are worried about ending up like Hong Kong — with the clamping down on freedom of speech and press — he agrees that it’s a legitimate concern.
There’s a saying, he adds: “Today’s Hong Kong is tomorrow’s Taiwan.”
Moreover, Ng believes that the Sunflower movement played an inspirational role to protesters in Hong Kong.
“It helped in terms of planting a seed,” Ng says. “Even if there wasn’t overt coordination, there was still a spiritual connection at least.”
Ng was actually on vacation in Kaohsiung when the Sunflower movement broke out. He participated in a sit-in there and was asked to give a speech but declined because he felt that his Mandarin wasn’t good enough. Nevertheless, he says it was “refreshing” to see such mass mobilization happen in Taiwan, rather than in a city like New York, where he wouldn’t have given it a second thought.
“I remember telling myself that this is what it must have felt like to be in Tiananmen Square in 1989,” Ng tells me.
When I ask him why he thinks the foreign media didn’t give the Sunflower movement as extensive coverage as it did with the Umbrella revolution, his reply is simple: “there was nothing sexy.”
More often than not, the press is sensation-driven. While the Sunflower movement was largely non-violent, consisting of mostly peaceful protesters occupying the legislature to show their defiance of the cross-strait service trade agreement with China, the protests in Hong Kong — which took place on the streets and involved the police using tear gas on protesters — was far more visible.
“Some guy in Tennessee wouldn’t be interested in some people sitting inside a building in Taiwan to protest a trade pact,” Ng says.
THE COFFEE SHOP DREAM
Although Ng might have his qualms about Hong Kong’s future, he is hopeful for Taiwan. Not only did the Sunflower movement make possible the nine-in-one elections, he says, which led to the Chinese National Party (KMT) losing the Taipei mayorship, but Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) also seems more interested in developing the economy rather than fixating on cross-strait relations.
Politics aside, people from Hong Kong have increasingly come to see Taiwan as an ideal place to live and work. Citing figures from a TVB Evening News report, Ng says the percentage of people from Hong Kong applying for permits to live in Taiwan increased by 64 percent from 2013 to last year.
Ng says this is because they are attracted to the laidback lifestyle and entrepreneurial work ethic that Taiwan has to offer. It wasn’t the case a decade ago when people from Hong Kong thought Taipei — with its grimy sidewalks and lack of skyscrapers — had much catching up to do with other Asian cities.
“There’s the allure of a slower pace of life,” Ng says. “Some of the most popular books in bookstores around Hong Kong are about how to move to Taiwan, and people are dreaming of opening coffee shops in Taipei.”
Ng has to rush off to another panel discussion and I’m wondering how he manages to look so immaculate despite the torrid Singapore heat. Nevertheless, his words left me thinking that while we may not be as zesty as activists in Hong Kong, at least we’re brewing good coffee.
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
April 21 to April 27 Hsieh Er’s (謝娥) political fortunes were rising fast after she got out of jail and joined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in December 1945. Not only did she hold key positions in various committees, she was elected the only woman on the Taipei City Council and headed to Nanjing in 1946 as the sole Taiwanese female representative to the National Constituent Assembly. With the support of first lady Soong May-ling (宋美齡), she started the Taipei Women’s Association and Taiwan Provincial Women’s Association, where she
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,