Taiwan gained insight into the Latin aphorism ars longa, vita brevis (art is long, life is short) with LAB Space’s recent production of Tuesdays with Morrie. Directed by Taiwan-based impresario Brook Hall, the play, like the well-known memoir of the same name, treats the relationship of sports writer Mitch Albom and his former professor Morrie Schwartz as the latter faces death. Taiwan, however, got more than just a play in that process; it got an intriguing look into the symbiotic relationships that exist between art, life and serendipity.
Start with the book and biography. Certainly, no one will deny how autobiographical and biographical elements can run through art and fiction. Many of Hemingway’s novels, for example, draw both upon his and the life experiences of his friends for background.
The play differs from the book. In drama, since each production varies in director and cast, the impact will also be different. Taiwan’s production of the play had this one extra feature — Rob Schwartz, the son of Morrie Schwartz, attended performances in the last week and stayed to answer audience questions, biographical and otherwise.
Photo courtesy of Tobie Openshaw
Intermixed is serendipity. Rob Schwartz made a point of using that word in one of his answers. Working in Tokyo as Bureau Chief of Billboard Magazine, he learned of Taiwan’s production via a Facebook posting and volunteered to visit. Serendipity played a big part in the writing of the book as well. If Mitch Albom had not been channel surfing at the time he would not have learned of the debilitating condition of Morrie from Ted Koppel’s Nightline. He would also probably not have had the time for the 14 Tuesday visits with Morrie before his death except that Albom’s paper was on strike freeing up his schedule.
For his part, Hall says he was influenced by the book and wanted LAB Space to be known for more than comedies. He also had the constraints of the small theater space requiring plays with a minimal cast and he had in mind a well-known entertainer, DC Rapier, to fit the lead role. Rapier read the book and was moved by both it and the play, but the lines of the play perhaps had more impact since a friend of his had just died and Rapier himself had had a somewhat life-threatening operation. Victor Stevenson, who played Mitch, used the illness and death of his own father to help identify with his role. He and Rapier developed the needed chemistry for the play.
Rob Schwartz brought other elements in. What was it like growing up with his father? How did the family feel about Mitch? When the Schwartz family sold the house made famous by the book, his mother refused to let that be part of the advertisement, though it would have increased the value. A best seller? Several publishers had originally refused the book; it did not take off until Oprah endorsed it. Did that make it art or more what the general public wanted or both? Some people might have liked the book less if they knew of the left wing politics of Rob’s father. That element was purposely left out. And of course there were unrelated questions like, what do you feel about Doraemon?
Photo courtesy of Tobie Openshaw
The book allows for pauses and rereading; the play is bounded by a brief time span for digestion but it is live. Those who had read the memoir could make their own judgments. Rob Schwartz obviously preferred the book; it dealt with his father’s life and thought. This writer preferred the play, perhaps because the drama made the learning and change in Albom’s writing direction more poignant. Having read the book nearly a decade ago, the only specific remembrance is how Albom symbolically brought food that Morrie Schwartz could no longer eat.
Morrie Schwartz died before Albom’s book on his final “class” hit bookshelves; he would never know the full reach of the work and certainly could not have envisioned the play being shown in Taiwan. Life, reality, art, serendipity and memoir; it is all here and the LAB Space as community theater is part of it. For future projects by LAB Space, go to www.facebook.com/labspacetw.
Photos courtesy of Tobie Openshaw
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
Mirror mirror on the wall, what’s the fairest Disney live-action remake of them all? Wait, mirror. Hold on a second. Maybe choosing from the likes of Alice in Wonderland (2010), Mulan (2020) and The Lion King (2019) isn’t such a good idea. Mirror, on second thought, what’s on Netflix? Even the most devoted fans would have to acknowledge that these have not been the most illustrious illustrations of Disney magic. At their best (Pete’s Dragon? Cinderella?) they breathe life into old classics that could use a little updating. At their worst, well, blue Will Smith. Given the rapacious rate of remakes in modern