Lou Yi-an (樓一安) has had a recurring dream since childhood. In the dream, he stands alone on a stage. There is one word he needs to communicate, but he freezes. The audience laughs as he struggles to remember.
“It is a strange, vivid memory. I suddenly become aware of my own existence. What am I doing standing here? Why am I here at all?”
The dream becomes the opening scene of The Losers (廢物), the second feature film directed and written by Lou. In the film, the word he struggles to recall is “land.”
Photo courtesy of Lou Yi-an
Lou arrives to the interview wearing a T-shirt emblazoned with a McDonald’s logo with an upturned middle finger and “I’m fuckin’ it” written on it. When pushed for an answer on how he became interested in left-wing causes, he mentions Karl Marx, Lu Xun (魯迅) and Woodstock.
The filmmaker is frequently spotted at street protests; his films always center on the disadvantaged.
The Losers is no exception. Following Shiou, a failed actor, returning to his Greater Kaohsiung suburb hometown, Meinong (美濃), the film probes some of the difficult issues facing Taiwan’s farming villages. One involves what locals call “venomous dragon ponds” (毒龍潭) — sand and gravel companies buying up fertile land from elderly farmers, which they turn into gravel extraction sites while selling the soil for whopping profits. The companies then refill the farmland with medical waste and other scrap upon which houses are to be built later.
Such operations are a common occurrence in Taiwan’s countryside, and Meinong is one of the areas where the shady business is out of control, Lou says.
Lou and his crew were able to film one of these sites, but had to ask the local police to “guarantee” their safety.
“The sand and gravel business can, you know, spell danger,” the director says.
It is the kind of danger touched upon in a sequence in which Shiou stops by the extraction site, trying to take a photograph as a piece of evidence. A man looking like a hoodlum appears out of nowhere and chases him away.
RURAL PROBLEMS
Originally a project commissioned by Hakka Television Service, the film draws its inspiration from the defunct Hakka band Labor Exchange’s (交工樂隊) Night March of the Chrysanthemums (菊花夜行軍), an epic album telling of a young Hakka man returning to Meinong to become a flower farmer and raise a family with his Indonesian wife.
“I have this strange attachment to Meinong because of Lin Sheng-hsiang’s (林生祥) music. It inspired me to learn about this place … It just so happens that lots of things I am particularly concerned about are happening in Meinong,” Lou says.
For Lou, all the issues revolve around the idea of land, its value and people’s relation to it.
“When you enter the town, there are real-estate ads everywhere you see … Farmers are too old to farm, and their children are not coming back. The land is unused, waiting for the right price,” he adds.
While dealing with unsavory issues — land exploitation, drug abuse, rural poverty — Lou’s film doesn’t differentiate the good guys from the bad guys, or draw a clear line between right and wrong. Each of the characters is on their own, striving to find a place in the world.
“I don’t want my characters to make demands, take action or affect change, because that’s not what happens in real life. Most kids who live in rural areas don’t think, of or are incapable of, fighting for a cause … I don’t want to make a statement. I see problems, put them into my works for people to see,” Lou says.
SOCIAL AWARENESS
Lou and Singing Chen (陳芯宜), his long-term collaborator, are among the most socially conscious filmmakers of their generation. Together, the two have made several feature-length and short works including Chen’s God Man Dog (流浪神狗人), Lou’s debut feature A Place of One’s Own (一席之地, 2009) and his award-winning short Waterfront Villa Bonita (水岸麗景, 2007). Their oeuvres look at the vices and virtues of Taiwanese society through characters who are social misfits, dispossessed Aborigines and members of the deprived and the displaced.
However harsh the reality is that the filmmakers address, they always manage to reflect it with a dark sense of humor, making the unbearable absurd and comic. Chen prefers magical realism; Lou’s direction is more inclined towards realism.
“The more I have seen, the more I feel that it won’t work if you tell people: ‘fuck, let’s overthrow the government.’ They will be like: ‘oh crap, here comes the mob again.’ It is better when these things are implied,” Lou says.
However, with no big names in the cast, together with the heavy subject matter, The Losers is no crowd pleaser. Lou says he was advised not to have the film theatrically released.
The film is currently playing at Taipei’s Spot Huashan Cinema (光點華山電影館) for one week. It was the only theater willing to show it, and the run ends tomorrow.
However, Lou isn’t discouraged. He hopes that the film will have “a longer life” and to be shown through different venues and events such as college campus tours.
“I don’t particularly love films. I make films because I have something to say … The Losers is a story I really want to tell. It is important that it reaches as many people as possible.”
Feb. 17 to Feb. 23 “Japanese city is bombed,” screamed the banner in bold capital letters spanning the front page of the US daily New Castle News on Feb. 24, 1938. This was big news across the globe, as Japan had not been bombarded since Western forces attacked Shimonoseki in 1864. “Numerous Japanese citizens were killed and injured today when eight Chinese planes bombed Taihoku, capital of Formosa, and other nearby cities in the first Chinese air raid anywhere in the Japanese empire,” the subhead clarified. The target was the Matsuyama Airfield (today’s Songshan Airport in Taipei), which
On Jan. 17, Beijing announced that it would allow residents of Shanghai and Fujian Province to visit Taiwan. The two sides are still working out the details. President William Lai (賴清德) has been promoting cross-strait tourism, perhaps to soften the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) attitudes, perhaps as a sop to international and local opinion leaders. Likely the latter, since many observers understand that the twin drivers of cross-strait tourism — the belief that Chinese tourists will bring money into Taiwan, and the belief that tourism will create better relations — are both false. CHINESE TOURISM PIPE DREAM Back in July
Could Taiwan’s democracy be at risk? There is a lot of apocalyptic commentary right now suggesting that this is the case, but it is always a conspiracy by the other guys — our side is firmly on the side of protecting democracy and always has been, unlike them! The situation is nowhere near that bleak — yet. The concern is that the power struggle between the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and their now effectively pan-blue allies the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) intensifies to the point where democratic functions start to break down. Both
This was not supposed to be an election year. The local media is billing it as the “2025 great recall era” (2025大罷免時代) or the “2025 great recall wave” (2025大罷免潮), with many now just shortening it to “great recall.” As of this writing the number of campaigns that have submitted the requisite one percent of eligible voters signatures in legislative districts is 51 — 35 targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus lawmakers and 16 targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers. The pan-green side has more as they started earlier. Many recall campaigns are billing themselves as “Winter Bluebirds” after the “Bluebird Action”
RSS