By killing off Shida’s cafes, international restaurants and culture spaces, is Taipei shooting itself in the foot? Several international travel writers contacted by the Taipei Times seem to think so. They say the move makes Taipei look bad and compare the current situation to a crackdown by China’s Communist Party.
“The saddest and most ironic thing about this Shida initiative is that the Shida neighborhood pioneered the scene that has made Taipei the vibrant, cosmopolitan city it is today,” says Chris Taylor, novelist and Lonely Planet author.
Lonely Planet lists Taiwan as one of its “top 10 countries for 2012,” and the latest Taiwan guidebook rates Shida as Taipei’s second best night market, after Shilin.
“Taipei now has a nightlife and dining scene that rivals any in the region and can give many major international cities a run for their money,” says Taylor. “But in 1989, when I first took an apartment in the district, it was really the only place in town where you could step out outside and enjoy a neighborhood cup of coffee, a beer and edible Western cuisine.”
“Tearing out the heart of Shida by shutting down the very businesses that have for so long defined it is no better than the ‘red is best’ revival staged by recently disgraced Chongqing head, Bo Xilai (薄熙來),” he continues. “Beyond that, it’s difficult to imagine Taipei without Shida, and its neighborhood association is doing a grave and irresponsible disservice to the city. Shida belongs to Taipei, not to a community association of curmudgeonly kill-joys.”
“As a travel writer and longtime friend of Taiwan I urge the government to protect the people and culture of Shida,” implores Joshua Samuel Brown, author of eight Lonely Planet guidebooks, including the most recent two guides on Taiwan.
Brown views Shida as “Taipei’s Greenwich Village” and believes it stands out for its “vibrant cafe culture, its night market, and the people who call it home.”
Brown feels the city government’s recent decision to stop tourism promotion of the Shida Night Market, along with the Yongkang Street food neighborhood, is “a stupid move that will only hasten the neighborhood’s demise at the hands of rapacious real estate developers.”
As for the city’s crackdown on the 16-year-old rock club Underworld, he says, “Obviously I’m deeply saddened by it. Underworld was a great little club, Taipei’s CBGBs. What’s happening to Shida is the sort of thing I’d expect to see in Beijing, not in Taipei.”
New York Times travel writer Matt Gross says that in recent visits to Shida, he found that “there was just so much going on there, from the crazy variety of international restaurants (including multiple worthy burger joints) to the effortlessly hip boutiques. It had the energy of Ximending, but with a more homegrown, grown-up, honest feel to it.”
“What I’ve always loved about Taiwan is the culture, the way people create street life and community when they’re not given specific direction by the authorities,” says Gross. “If you want to see, or feel, what Taipei is about, don’t go to the second tallest building in the world. Go to a smaller night market, head off into the smaller streets, and take your time getting to know the people and the atmosphere there.”
But when it comes to the current changes in Shida, Gross believes, “the smarter approach would be to help the extant businesses relocate and re-adapt, maintaining the cultural life that’s grown up in the neighborhood.”
“Here’s what I always say when people ask me how their city, state, or nation can attract more tourists: Don’t develop for tourists’ sake,” Gross continues. “Make your city, state, or nation a better place for its citizens, and tourists will follow, hoping to participate in a novel, vibrant scene. That’s what we do here in New York, you know, and it’s worked out pretty well.”
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
The Taipei Times last week reported that the Control Yuan said it had been “left with no choice” but to ask the Constitutional Court to rule on the constitutionality of the central government budget, which left it without a budget. Lost in the outrage over the cuts to defense and to the Constitutional Court were the cuts to the Control Yuan, whose operating budget was slashed by 96 percent. It is unable even to pay its utility bills, and in the press conference it convened on the issue, said that its department directors were paying out of pocket for gasoline
On March 13 President William Lai (賴清德) gave a national security speech noting the 20th year since the passing of China’s Anti-Secession Law (反分裂國家法) in March 2005 that laid the legal groundwork for an invasion of Taiwan. That law, and other subsequent ones, are merely political theater created by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to have something to point to so they can claim “we have to do it, it is the law.” The president’s speech was somber and said: “By its actions, China already satisfies the definition of a ‘foreign hostile force’ as provided in the Anti-Infiltration Act, which unlike
RSS