One of the most exciting foodie news items in recent months was the redevelopment by the Mitsui Food and Beverage Enterprise Group (三井餐飲事業集團) of the Taipei Fish Market (台北魚市) located on Taipei’s Minzu East Road, close to the intersection with Jianguo North Road.
Back in February, this reviewer visited the sushi bar of the Addiction Aquatic Development (上引水產), which has won high praise for the quality of its food (see Taipei Times on Feb. 23, 2012).
The establishment now also offers a separate indoor crustacean restaurant, hot pot restaurant and an outdoor grill restaurant. The lure of grilled seafood, a jug of beer and an outdoor dining environment was a good excuse to check out the grill restaurant, which makes excellent use of a wide plaza at the center of the fish market complex.
Photo: Ian Bartholomew, Taipei Times
The thing that needs to be appreciated from the get-go is that patrons do not grill their own food. The delightful hibachi device that is placed at each table is merely to keep food warm, and provide the effect of a grill, but with none of the smoke and mess that actual cooking would entail. This could prove a letdown for those eager to get their hands dirty cooking things for themselves, but on the upside, one is reasonably certain that the fish, shellfish and other foods are all properly prepared by professionals. And you don’t come away from the table smelling of cooked meat and charcoal.
The setup of the grill restaurant does provide diners with something of a fish market experience, as you are taken along a display case of seafood, some creatures alive in tanks, others presented on beds of ice, your server taking your order as you go along. You can look at the food in its raw state, then pick what you decide looks most enticing. Further along the display are skewers of corn and mushrooms, and meats such as chicken and lamb, and prepared foods, such as mushrooms stuffed with shrimp, which are served deep-fried.
Once your order is placed, you can sit back and wait for a bevy of chefs in a semi-open grill house to prepare your food. Depending on what you order, prices can vary through a very wide range. Many of the seafood items are sold by weight at market prices, changing from day to day, as does the selection available.
The prices for some of the larger shellfish are quite high. King crab (帝王蟹) claws, a hot favorite the day I visited, cost NT$580 each. Small lobsters were NT$720 a portion, and some of the superior fish were between NT$600 and NT$900. Fortunately for those on a budget, there are quite a lot of cheaper fish to choose from. Half pieces of grilled Japanese armorhead (壺鯛一夜干燒) at NT$300 and NT$200 for a whole salt grilled ayu (子持香魚鹽燒) served as the main body of my meal. The grilling had been well judged and the flesh for both was sweet, the outsides crisp and nicely charred. A small portion of grilled squid (NT$80) and scallops in the shell (NT$170 each) also proved delicious. The freshness of the produce shone through.
Unfortunately, the same could not be said of the chicken skewers (NT$50 each), which were disappointing. The meat did not taste fresh, and in any case the flavor was overwhelmingly of sweet Japanese-style barbeque sauce. Everything about it seemed wrong for an establishment touting its credentials as a market for the very freshest ingredients.
An unexpected highlight of the meal was the deep-fried burdock root (炸牛蒡片, NT$60 a portion), an excellent accompaniment to the strongly flavored fish. A wide range of beverages is on offer, but for the hot weather, a 500ml mug of chilled Asahi beer for just NT$100 seemed wonderfully inviting.
As with the sushi bar at Addiction Aquatic Development, the grill restaurant is a mix of many outstanding qualities with a few significant flaws that could fatally undermine the dining experience. The grill chefs certainly know their business and the food is brought to the table promptly, but the service style and the display of the produce is all just a little too haphazard, and the echoes of an NT$299 all-you-can-eat establishment do not sit well with the high prices and aspirations to modern urban chic.
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
Mirror mirror on the wall, what’s the fairest Disney live-action remake of them all? Wait, mirror. Hold on a second. Maybe choosing from the likes of Alice in Wonderland (2010), Mulan (2020) and The Lion King (2019) isn’t such a good idea. Mirror, on second thought, what’s on Netflix? Even the most devoted fans would have to acknowledge that these have not been the most illustrious illustrations of Disney magic. At their best (Pete’s Dragon? Cinderella?) they breathe life into old classics that could use a little updating. At their worst, well, blue Will Smith. Given the rapacious rate of remakes in modern
RSS