After largely ignoring photography over the past decades, Taiwan’s galleries, museums and art fairs are duly making up for lost time.
The Museum of Contemporary Art, Taipei (MOCA, Taipei) steps into the picture with New Generation Photographers of Taiwan (台灣新世代攝影), a group show that presents the work of 13 “up-and-coming talents.” According to the exhibition introduction, the show attempts to reveal the “perspective of the new era, which goes beyond the traditional and conservative notion of photography held by past generations.”
Who are the old fuddy-duddy photographers that the museum’s blurb refers to? Perhaps Chang Tsai (張才), honored with a retrospective at the Taipei Fine Arts Museum last year? Or, closer to our “era,” Magnum photographer Chang Chien-chi (張乾琦)? It doesn’t say. In any event, this is MOCA’s first group show devoted purely to Taiwanese photographers (last year’s four-person exhibit at the Zhongshan MRT excluded), and it’s perhaps telling that it is shown in its Studio gallery rather than in the museum’s main exhibit space.
Photo courtesy of MOCA, Taipei
Still, curator Suan Hooi-wah (全會華), who runs the Taiwan International Visual Art Center, a gallery devoted to photography, has put together a fine exhibit — though the variety of work on display makes a coherent theme practically impossible. The show does, however, offer a panoramic perspective of what preoccupies this “new generation” of photographers: landscapes, people and art. Sound familiar? It should. And many of the photographers give explicit reference to what has come before.
Every section comes with an artist statement, succinct in style, as a guide for the viewer. Take Sim Chang (張哲榕): He uses “the power of pink to turn this world into an amusement park full of happiness and joy.” He’s not kidding. These cutesy photographs, many shot at theme parks, depict a doll-like woman dressed in a garish pink skirt and yellow rubber boots. Think waipai (outside photography, 外拍), popularized during the Japanese colonial era and revised over the past five years as amateur photographers and would-be models hit Taiwan’s most scenic locations.
Though Feng Chun-lan (馮君藍) whimsically dubs himself a “foolish sinner,” his monochrome portraits — a man holding an oil lamp or a pouting boy staring melancholically at the viewer — are anything but whimsical. Feng, a pastor at the Taiwan Chinese Rhenish Church (台灣中華基督教禮賢會), employs the precepts of Christian anthropology to create “spiritual portraits” that are, in this reviewer’s opinion, the show’s best because of their haunting psychological depictions of their subjects.
Photo courtesy of MOCA, Taipei
There are also some works evoking particular art styles, such as Deng Bo-ren’s (鄧博仁) delightfully amateurish collage works that comment on fashion and consumerism, and Chou Chih-lung’s (周志龍) surreal bedroom scenes. Elaine Lee’s (李宣儀) multiple-exposure color photographs, without digital manipulation, were inspired by the “atmospheric impressions” of 19th century paintings. For this reviewer, however, they are expressionist renderings at best, reminiscent of Zao Wou-ki’s (趙無極) late-1960s autumnal paintings.
But for the most part, Taiwan’s changing landscapes and cityscapes serve as the exhibit’s focal point. At first glance, Chung Shun-lung’s (鍾順龍) pictures of concrete columns (the kind used to construct freeways) look like drab photos taken by an engineer. Twenty minutes later, however, our party of three was still discussing the images’ techniques and topography.
Chung’s photos delineate the disjunction between past and present, the pillars disappearing into the horizon of some partially constructed future. The photos hint at the ongoing process of industrialization, its pristine white pillars rising up from the rice fields of Taiwan’s rapidly disappearing agricultural society.
Photo courtesy of MOCA, Taipei
Taiwan’s ongoing development is similarly addressed by Chang Hsiao-chen (張小成). His images capture the manner in which a torn down structure imprints itself on the facade of other buildings that remain standing: the muddy silhouette of a small shack or the exposed brick outline of a demolished building. For Chang Hsiao-chen, the walls of a standing building serve as a metaphor for a headstone, the imprint its epitaph.
There is much else to see here that is worthwhile and this reviewer looks forward to future photography exhibits by Taiwan’s artists at MOCA. And, dare I say, in its main gallery space. There are plenty of subjects to draw on: portraiture from World War II to the present, or buildings ranging from pre-Japanese colonial era hovels to the phallic Taipei 101. As this exhibit reveals — along with shows at many other venues over the past two years — Taiwan certainly isn’t lacking in photographers who can depict the present with an eye on the past.
Photo courtesy of MOCA, Taipei
Photo courtesy of MOCA, Taipei
There is a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plot to put millions at the mercy of the CCP using just released AI technology. This isn’t being overly dramatic. The speed at which AI is improving is exponential as AI improves itself, and we are unprepared for this because we have never experienced anything like this before. For example, a few months ago music videos made on home computers began appearing with AI-generated people and scenes in them that were pretty impressive, but the people would sprout extra arms and fingers, food would inexplicably fly off plates into mouths and text on
On the final approach to Lanshan Workstation (嵐山工作站), logging trains crossed one last gully over a dramatic double bridge, taking the left line to enter the locomotive shed or the right line to continue straight through, heading deeper into the Central Mountains. Today, hikers have to scramble down a steep slope into this gully and pass underneath the rails, still hanging eerily in the air even after the bridge’s supports collapsed long ago. It is the final — but not the most dangerous — challenge of a tough two-day hike in. Back when logging was still underway, it was a quick,
From censoring “poisonous books” to banning “poisonous languages,” the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) tried hard to stamp out anything that might conflict with its agenda during its almost 40 years of martial law. To mark 228 Peace Memorial Day, which commemorates the anti-government uprising in 1947, which was violently suppressed, I visited two exhibitions detailing censorship in Taiwan: “Silenced Pages” (禁書時代) at the National 228 Memorial Museum and “Mandarin Monopoly?!” (請說國語) at the National Human Rights Museum. In both cases, the authorities framed their targets as “evils that would threaten social mores, national stability and their anti-communist cause, justifying their actions
In the run-up to World War II, Admiral Wilhelm Canaris, head of Abwehr, Nazi Germany’s military intelligence service, began to fear that Hitler would launch a war Germany could not win. Deeply disappointed by the sell-out of the Munich Agreement in 1938, Canaris conducted several clandestine operations that were aimed at getting the UK to wake up, invest in defense and actively support the nations Hitler planned to invade. For example, the “Dutch war scare” of January 1939 saw fake intelligence leaked to the British that suggested that Germany was planning to invade the Netherlands in February and acquire airfields
RSS