Nearly two weeks after US blockbuster Avatar was ordered out of some theaters to make way for homegrown epic Confucius (孔子), the Chinese film is not getting a warm welcome.
The movie about the ancient philosopher’s life starring Chow Yun-fat (周潤發) has been savaged by critics and reports suggest box office sales have been sluggish.
The film is being panned as a wooden and preachy biography that sells out by forcing in battle scenes and even a romantic love interest for the revered thinker.
On the popular movie site Mtime.com, it scored a 3.8 out of 10 in user-submitted reviews, compared to 9.4 for Avatar. The Global Times gave it a 4 out of 10, calling it “thoughtless and mind-numbing.”
Han Han (韓寒), one of China’s most popular writers who is widely viewed as a key voice of the country’s youth generation, gave it a two on his popular blog, calling it an entertainment, educational, and business failure.
“It is a film that could be completely done without,” he wrote.
In its first three weeks in China, Avatar topped US$100 million in revenue to become China’s all-time top-grossing film, or about US$4.7 million a day. Confucius averaged just US$1.8 million a day in its first three days, Xinhua reported. State film agencies refused to provide figures.
The previous box-office champ — the disaster epic 2012 — grossed nearly US$70 million dollars late last year, state media has said.
Reports that the 2D version of Avatar was to be pulled late last month sparked accusations the government wanted it pushed aside for Confucius, whose teachings on harmony and respect for authority enjoy official favor under the ruling Communist Party after decades of being suppressed as “feudal.”
The 3D version of Avatar is expected to continue showing through this month as planned, state press reports have said.
On Wednesday, Confucius’ producer denied that US blockbuster Avatar was ordered out of some theaters to make way for the homegrown film.
John Shum, head of the film company that produced Confucius, denied that Avatar was pulled for his film about social harmony and respect for authority — themes that enjoy official favor in China.
“This is not the fact. We shouldn’t complicate the matter. A movie is a movie and we are simply shooting a touching story about Confucius,” he told reporters in Taipei.
“If China wants to politicize things that’s their business ... It has nothing to do with us,” he said. “But I hope they didn’t do it because it would not help, but hurt Confucius instead.”
Meanwhile, theaters in Beijing and across China continue to show the 2D version of Avatar, according to theaters and movie listing Web sites.
Some Chinese have speculated authorities were nervous about the portrayal in Avatar of a tribe resisting humans chasing them from their land on a far-off planet, saying it too closely evoked a wave of unrest in China linked to land disputes that has made authorities nervous.
China allows only 20 foreign films to be shown in its theaters each year splitting revenue among producers, theaters and local distributors, which the US has criticized as unfairly protecting domestic films.
Part of the problem could be that although it is building theaters rapidly, China still has only a fraction of the number in the US. Moreover, perhaps one-third of its estimated 4,700 cinema screens are too antiquated to show foreign films, according to one industry worker.
Those few foreign films compete with a growing number of domestic films — more than 400 in 2008, including those co-produced with foreign companies. Overall, box-office revenue is soaring.
But China’s main studios are all state-owned and some producers complain that the government cannot decide whether movies should serve as market-driven entertainment or nationalistic propaganda.
Critics say Confucius belongs in the latter category. The movie, produced by Beijing Dadi Century Ltd, focuses on the later life of the philosopher, whose teachings are garnering renewed interest in China. The cast was billed as star-studded. It opened on 2,500 screens in China, a record number.
Chow, who plays Confucius, predicted it would challenge the box-office success of Avatar, produced by 20th Century Fox. But 13,039 Internet users gave Confucius ratings that averaged 4.4 on a scale of 1 to 10 on douban.com, a popular Chinese entertainment Web site. About 95,280 users gave Avatar a rating that averaged 9.1.
Earlier this month Economic Affairs Minister Kuo Jyh-huei (郭智輝) proposed buying green power from the Philippines and shipping it to Taiwan, in remarks made during a legislative hearing. Because this is an eminently reasonable and useful proposal, it was immediately criticized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). KMT Legislator Chang Chia-chun (張嘉郡) said that Taiwan pays NT$40 billion annually to fix cables, while TPP heavyweight Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) complained that Kuo wanted to draw public attention away from Taiwan’s renewable energy ratio. Considering the legal troubles currently inundating the TPP, one would think Huang would
Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) last week told residents to avoid wearing scary Halloween costumes on the MRT so as not to alarm other passengers. Well, I thought, so much for my plan to visit Taipei dressed as the National Development Council’s (NDC) biennial population report “Population Projections for the Republic of China (Taiwan): 2024-2070,” which came out last week. Terms like “low birth rate” and “demographic decline” do not cut it — the report is nothing short of a demographic disaster. Yet, in Taiwan, as in other countries, it is solvable. It simply requires a change in mindset. As it
Chiayi County is blessed with several worthwhile upland trails, not all of which I’ve hiked. A few weeks ago, I finally got around to tackling Tanghu Historic Trail (塘湖古道), a short but unusually steep route in Jhuci Township (竹崎). According to the Web site of the Alishan National Scenic Area (阿里山國家風景區), the path climbs from 308m above sea level to an elevation of 770m in just 1.58km, an average gradient of 29 percent. And unless you arrange for someone to bring you to the starting point and collect you at the other end, there’s no way to avoid a significant amount
For three films now, Tom Hardy has smushed Jekyll and Hyde into one strange and slimy double act. In a Marvel universe filled with alter egos that cloak stealthy superpowers, his investigative reporter Eddie Brock doesn’t transform. He shares his body with an ink-black alien symbiote (voiced with a baritone growl by Hardy), who sometimes swallows him whole, sometimes shoots a tentacle or two out and always chipperly punctuates Eddie’s inner monologue. These have been consistently messy, almost willfully bad movies, but Hardy’s performance has been a strangely compelling one-body buddy comedy. It’s one thing to throw a cape on and
RSS