Nearly two weeks after US blockbuster Avatar was ordered out of some theaters to make way for homegrown epic Confucius (孔子), the Chinese film is not getting a warm welcome.
The movie about the ancient philosopher’s life starring Chow Yun-fat (周潤發) has been savaged by critics and reports suggest box office sales have been sluggish.
The film is being panned as a wooden and preachy biography that sells out by forcing in battle scenes and even a romantic love interest for the revered thinker.
On the popular movie site Mtime.com, it scored a 3.8 out of 10 in user-submitted reviews, compared to 9.4 for Avatar. The Global Times gave it a 4 out of 10, calling it “thoughtless and mind-numbing.”
Han Han (韓寒), one of China’s most popular writers who is widely viewed as a key voice of the country’s youth generation, gave it a two on his popular blog, calling it an entertainment, educational, and business failure.
“It is a film that could be completely done without,” he wrote.
In its first three weeks in China, Avatar topped US$100 million in revenue to become China’s all-time top-grossing film, or about US$4.7 million a day. Confucius averaged just US$1.8 million a day in its first three days, Xinhua reported. State film agencies refused to provide figures.
The previous box-office champ — the disaster epic 2012 — grossed nearly US$70 million dollars late last year, state media has said.
Reports that the 2D version of Avatar was to be pulled late last month sparked accusations the government wanted it pushed aside for Confucius, whose teachings on harmony and respect for authority enjoy official favor under the ruling Communist Party after decades of being suppressed as “feudal.”
The 3D version of Avatar is expected to continue showing through this month as planned, state press reports have said.
On Wednesday, Confucius’ producer denied that US blockbuster Avatar was ordered out of some theaters to make way for the homegrown film.
John Shum, head of the film company that produced Confucius, denied that Avatar was pulled for his film about social harmony and respect for authority — themes that enjoy official favor in China.
“This is not the fact. We shouldn’t complicate the matter. A movie is a movie and we are simply shooting a touching story about Confucius,” he told reporters in Taipei.
“If China wants to politicize things that’s their business ... It has nothing to do with us,” he said. “But I hope they didn’t do it because it would not help, but hurt Confucius instead.”
Meanwhile, theaters in Beijing and across China continue to show the 2D version of Avatar, according to theaters and movie listing Web sites.
Some Chinese have speculated authorities were nervous about the portrayal in Avatar of a tribe resisting humans chasing them from their land on a far-off planet, saying it too closely evoked a wave of unrest in China linked to land disputes that has made authorities nervous.
China allows only 20 foreign films to be shown in its theaters each year splitting revenue among producers, theaters and local distributors, which the US has criticized as unfairly protecting domestic films.
Part of the problem could be that although it is building theaters rapidly, China still has only a fraction of the number in the US. Moreover, perhaps one-third of its estimated 4,700 cinema screens are too antiquated to show foreign films, according to one industry worker.
Those few foreign films compete with a growing number of domestic films — more than 400 in 2008, including those co-produced with foreign companies. Overall, box-office revenue is soaring.
But China’s main studios are all state-owned and some producers complain that the government cannot decide whether movies should serve as market-driven entertainment or nationalistic propaganda.
Critics say Confucius belongs in the latter category. The movie, produced by Beijing Dadi Century Ltd, focuses on the later life of the philosopher, whose teachings are garnering renewed interest in China. The cast was billed as star-studded. It opened on 2,500 screens in China, a record number.
Chow, who plays Confucius, predicted it would challenge the box-office success of Avatar, produced by 20th Century Fox. But 13,039 Internet users gave Confucius ratings that averaged 4.4 on a scale of 1 to 10 on douban.com, a popular Chinese entertainment Web site. About 95,280 users gave Avatar a rating that averaged 9.1.
On Jan. 17, Beijing announced that it would allow residents of Shanghai and Fujian Province to visit Taiwan. The two sides are still working out the details. President William Lai (賴清德) has been promoting cross-strait tourism, perhaps to soften the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) attitudes, perhaps as a sop to international and local opinion leaders. Likely the latter, since many observers understand that the twin drivers of cross-strait tourism — the belief that Chinese tourists will bring money into Taiwan, and the belief that tourism will create better relations — are both false. CHINESE TOURISM PIPE DREAM Back in July
Could Taiwan’s democracy be at risk? There is a lot of apocalyptic commentary right now suggesting that this is the case, but it is always a conspiracy by the other guys — our side is firmly on the side of protecting democracy and always has been, unlike them! The situation is nowhere near that bleak — yet. The concern is that the power struggle between the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and their now effectively pan-blue allies the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) intensifies to the point where democratic functions start to break down. Both
Taiwan doesn’t have a lot of railways, but its network has plenty of history. The government-owned entity that last year became the Taiwan Railway Corp (TRC) has been operating trains since 1891. During the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule, the colonial government made huge investments in rail infrastructure. The northern port city of Keelung was connected to Kaohsiung in the south. New lines appeared in Pingtung, Yilan and the Hualien-Taitung region. Railway enthusiasts exploring Taiwan will find plenty to amuse themselves. Taipei will soon gain its second rail-themed museum. Elsewhere there’s a number of endearing branch lines and rolling-stock collections, some
This was not supposed to be an election year. The local media is billing it as the “2025 great recall era” (2025大罷免時代) or the “2025 great recall wave” (2025大罷免潮), with many now just shortening it to “great recall.” As of this writing the number of campaigns that have submitted the requisite one percent of eligible voters signatures in legislative districts is 51 — 35 targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus lawmakers and 16 targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers. The pan-green side has more as they started earlier. Many recall campaigns are billing themselves as “Winter Bluebirds” after the “Bluebird Action”
RSS