Ellen Mackey circles the paradise of drought-tolerant plants edging her model eco-home and pauses before its electric meter, triumphant.
Its wheel is turning backward — her 36 rooftop solar panels injecting juice back into the city’s power grid.
“I use so little electricity the DWP [Department of Water and Power] tells me I’m one of their worst customers,” said Mackey, 57, of Sun Valley, California. “If every LA homeowner set up solar ... we could severely limit our use of electricity, reduce fossil fuels, limit global warming and stop giving money to people who hate us.”
Back on April 22, 1970, the ecologist had joined 20 million Americans in a grass-roots call for environmental action they named Earth Day. They were angry that acid rain fell in the East, rivers burned in the Midwest, and Los Angeles choked beneath a thick brown blanket of smog.
Mackey joined a projected 1 billion people around the world yesterday for an Earth Day rally to safeguard Mother Earth.
Nearly 40 years after the first widespread call for environmental protection helped spawn a tangle of regulations against pollution, the air looks cleaner,
the waters appear bluer and the roads seem to draw less litter.
But despite such gains — and a global consciousness gone green — many scientists say the planet is in jeopardy. Oceans are sick. Forests are clear-cut. And plant and animal species face extinction from climate change and a critical loss of habitat.
“We all agree that we’re in much worse shape than in 1970,” said Kathleen Rogers, president of the Earth Day Network, the group that organized Earth Day.
“We’ve cleaned up the stuff we can see. But it’s the stuff we can’t see — particulates in the air, toxins, the impact of persistent organic pollutants that turn male fish into female fish — that are more prevalent.
“We have a major battle ahead of us.”
‘ONE PERSON AT A TIME’
Earth Day festivals in the San Fernando Valley at the weekend featured attractions from yogis to zero-emissions cars.
But can individual contributions like curbside recycling, canvas shopping bags or native plants help avert a pending environmental cataclysm?
“It takes one person at a time,” said Stephanie Lallouz, producer of the Topanga Earth Day Festival. “It’s an awakening.”
Flashback to 1970.
Protests against the Vietnam War spilled over to outrage about industrial pollution: Oil that fouled Santa Barbara beaches. Bald eagles threatened by DDT. The Cuyahoga River in Cleveland again aflame.
In response, US Senator Gaylord Nelson proposed Earth Day, the first nationwide environmental protest. A modern green movement was born.
“It sounds as if the land has gone mad, and in a way some of it has — mad at man’s treatment of his environment,” said Life magazine following the first Earth Day event.
The green-flag event helped launch the Environmental Protection Agency and passage of the Clean Air, Clean Water and Endangered Species acts.
Since then, the smog alert has largely vanished from Los Angeles.
But environmental action did not, necessarily, make for an entirely healthier environment.
Global warming, habitat loss and hunting put one out of four mammals — including the Tasmanian devil — at risk of extinction by the end of this century, according to a 2008 report by the International Union for Conservation of Nature.
In addition, overfishing and acidification of the seas threaten coral reefs and marine species such as the Chinook salmon. Dead zones now lurk off the West Coast.
“In many ways, things have gotten better, in many ways, they’ve gotten worse,” said Ashwani Vasishth, professor of urban planning at California State University, Northridge, and founder of the year-old Institute for Sustainability.
While Southern California’s air is visibly cleaner, with fewer extremely smoggy days, Vasishth said that overall particulate levels have increased.
“What we call pollution is shifting,” he said. “How we measure harm to the environment is changing. We’re better informed. We’re more aware of our risks.
“If there’s one thing we need to be concerned about, it’s climate change. We’re running out of water, we’re running out of arable fertile land, of topsoil, we’re running out of carrying capacity of our oceans. We’ve been losing species at an accelerated rate.”
In 1970, the Earth was home to 3.7 billion people; today, there are 6.7 billion, an 80 percent increase. In the same period, the US population grew from
205 million to 306 million, while California’s
population nearly
doubled to 40 million.
Meanwhile, climate change has boosted the average Earth temperature by 0.7° C, enough to melt polar ice caps and raise the sea level 7.6cm.
Carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas blamed for global warming, has increased 18 percent. The impact of climate change, according to federal environmental regulators, ranges from drought to floods to more intense storms, in addition to harming water resources, agriculture, wildlife and ecosystems.
“It’s the population, it’s killing us,” said Bill Patzert, a research oceanographer at NASA’s Pasadena-based Jet Propulsion Laboratory, who for a decade has lectured on the dangers of climate change. “We’re worse off than we were before.
“The bottom line is that, in spite of all the good intentions of Earth Day — and all the do-gooders like me — we’ve dug ourselves into a deeper hole than we were in 40 years ago.”
Rogers, of Earth Day Network, says it’s incumbent upon the environmental and corporate communities to invest in green technology.
“We all need to become political,” she said. “I believe in volunteerism, but 99 percent of Earth Day is civic action, it’s public policy. It’s getting out there and telling other people in charge, ‘We’re not going to put up with it any more.’
“Because of climate change, we don’t have the luxury of sitting around anymore as citizens and waiting for something to happen.”
NOT A MOMENT TOO SOON
Mackey and her daughter, Alexia, weren’t about to wait before transforming their 1950s tract house into a model eco-home.
Ellen Mackey was 19 when she demonstrated in the 1970 Earth Day in Haverhill, Massachusetts.
“We didn’t know what to do,” she said. “So we picked up trash. We talked about whales. About clean water. Clean air. Pollution. Healthy issues.
“We wanted to change the world, to make a difference. I guess I never grew up. I still believe that one person can make a difference — that I, and my daughter, can make a difference.”
Mackey, now a senior ecologist for the Metropolitan Water District, has co-authored a book on Southern California’s native plant gardens. She’s also a past president of the Theodore Payne Foundation of Sun Valley and the Eco-Home Network of Silver Lake.
When she bought her 1950s home 12 years ago, her first water and electricity bill was US$238.
That was before she converted the 167m² house on a suburban cul-de-sac to an affordable-energy and water-conservation home.
First came the US$17,000 solar energy system — funded by a 70 percent rebate from the Department of Water and Power.
Then came US$10,000 in double-pane windows. Nearly US$1,700 in insulation in the attic, walls and floor. And a host of personal touches, including a recycled glass-and-granite countertop, composite wood hot tub deck and a needlepoint that reads “Reduce Reuse Repair Recycle.”
Outside her home is an extensive low-water garden that includes native flowers like purple sage interspersed with organic foods like tomatoes, blackberries and crook-neck squash.
Today, her highest utility bills are US$70 for two months of winter heat. In summer, she employs a swamp cooler, but pays no power bill. When it’s 37.7° C outside, it’s a temperate 23.8° C inside.
“We have a planetary problem,” said Mackey, standing next to a barrel used to catch rainwater. “We need people to know they can do this, on their budget, reducing their consumption of water and electricity.
“It’ll make a difference, to the state, to the nation, all the way to the polar bears ... You have to believe you can make a change.
“Or you’d give up.”
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
President William Lai’s (賴清德) March 13 national security speech marked a turning point. He signaled that the government was finally getting serious about a whole-of-society approach to defending the nation. The presidential office summarized his speech succinctly: “President Lai introduced 17 major strategies to respond to five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces: China’s threat to national sovereignty, its threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting Taiwan’s military, its threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan, its threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges, and its threats from
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
RSS