Pride and Glory
Edward Norton and Colin Farrell are New York policemen and brothers-in-law and Jon Voight is Norton’s father and top detective for Manhattan. The story starts with a disastrous drug bust in which four police are slain, then pits family loyalties against propriety with an ethnic Irish angle. For these compromised, feuding men, there’s no genuinely happy ending; dare it be said that the title of the film is meant to be ironic? Lukewarm reviews carped about the familiarity of it all, though a strong lineup should attract the faithful. Either way, the bluster of Pride and Glory only reinforces the contention that the opening half hour of World Trade Center remains the most credible portrayal of NYC cops in recent years.
Big Stan
Rob Schneider stars, directs and flogs anal rape humor for all it’s worth in this comedy eventually set in a prison. Schneider is a real estate shyster who gets jail time, but not before undergoing a course in self-defense from The Master (David Carradine). Unreleased in the US (a shame, because a Roger Ebert review of the film would have been a corker), though it’s been wandering through European and Asian territories for a year looking for a home. Now it’s Taiwan’s turn, presumably thanks to the modest success of You Don’t Mess With The Zohan, which was made later. The elegant Chinese title of the film (“Fierce Men Rape Prison”) should snare exactly the local audience Schneider is looking for.
The Women
Meg Ryan, Annette Bening, Jada Pinkett Smith, Bette Midler, Candice Bergen, Cloris Leachman, Carrie Fisher, to name a few ... what a cast. The relationships of four friends — with each other and the unseen men in their life — are the basis for a very loose remake of the George Cukor favorite from 1939, itself based on a hit play. This post-Sex and the City, Taiwanese-financed yarn is being marketed as having no male actors whatsoever, which might have worked in the 1930s, but it all seems a little desperate today, and a lot of critics were unimpressed. Still, watching the films back to back might offer a fascinating exercise in how women’s mores have changed — and stayed the same — over 70 years, at least in Hollywood’s eyes (but can you imagine Joan Crawford doing a tampon gag?). Directed by Diane English, a writer-producer of Murphy Brown.
Quarantine
Apparently there is yet to be a simultaneous release of a non-English-language film and its English-language remake (though 1931’s Dracula and a Spanish-language cover with the same title were shot over the same period in the same studio), but Quarantine has gone some way toward making this possible. A quickly produced stateside version of the Spanish zombie flick [Rec], which was released here only five months ago, this version follows the leader and tries to scare and disorientate in equal measure as a building’s residents succumb to a horrifying virus — but the survivors can’t get out. What needs to be asked is how many more shakycam epics will be made before the plug is finally pulled on this audience-unfriendly gimmick.
The Wave
A teacher in Germany launches a sociological experiment in his class that spreads, gets out of hand and sets the dogs of fascism loose for a new era. Critics sniffed at the obviousness of some of the moralizing, but the film’s momentum and intriguing premise — based on a real experiment conducted in a California high school in 1967 — sound like something that would happen if Jane Elliott of The Eye of the Storm fame lost control of her campaign to destroy racism and prejudice and ignited an iris race war. It’s interesting to contemplate what Taiwanese schoolkids would make of this film, not to mention the tantalizing ramifications of a “green versus blue” experiment in local classrooms — were it not for the suffocating conservatism of Taiwan’s education system.
A Job to Kill For
In a week of too many new releases and an Ingmar Bergman festival, it’s a mystery why this Canadian made-for-cable entry from 2006 would be dressed up as a cinema product and expected to capture market share. But if the idea of a humorless boardroom version of To Die For by veteran TV director Bill Corcoran (21 Jump Street, Wiseguy) grabs you, rush to catch this one before it disappears in a week or so. Sean Young (a long way from Blade Runner) is an executive whose new female assistant really wants a promotion.
Taiwan Association for Human Rights Film Festival
Lots of good titles are featured in this timely showcase, including Let Him Have It from the UK, Small Soldiers on the child soldiers of Liberia and works on state terror relating to Taiwan, Cambodia, North Korea, Tibet and Chile, among others, as well as indigenous issues. All screenings are free, so get down to the Eslite bookstore on Dunhua South Road (tomorrow and Sunday) and the Chinese Taipei Film Archive (from Monday through next Saturday) in Taipei and the Kaohsiung Film Archive (Dec. 21 to Dec. 31). More details at udhr60.twbbs.org.
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
President William Lai’s (賴清德) March 13 national security speech marked a turning point. He signaled that the government was finally getting serious about a whole-of-society approach to defending the nation. The presidential office summarized his speech succinctly: “President Lai introduced 17 major strategies to respond to five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces: China’s threat to national sovereignty, its threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting Taiwan’s military, its threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan, its threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges, and its threats from
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
RSS