A cinematic account of national history is never an easy task for filmmakers, who must do justice to the past yet produce a movie that is more entertaining than a teaching aid.
Based on Ching Da Kuei Di (情歸大地), a novel by Li Chiao (李喬), one of Taiwan’s best-known Hakka writers, 1895 (一八 九 五) brings to life the Hakka militias’ resistance to Japanese troops after Qing Dynasty China was defeated in the First Sino-Japanese War (1894 to 1895) and ceded Taiwan to Tokyo under the Treaty of Shimonoseki.
The ambitious work is educational at best and, with its barely passable storytelling techniques, is unlikely to attract an audience that goes beyond educators
and students.
Local starlet Cheryl Yang (楊謹華) plays the role of Huang Hsien-mei, the virtuous wife of Wu Tang-Wu Tang-xing, played by Wen Sheng-hao (溫昇豪). A well-educated young Hakka, Wu organizes guerrilla resistance against the Japanese together with two Hakka leaders, Jiang Shao-zu (姜紹祖), played by Chang Shu-hao (張書豪), and Hsu Xiang (徐驤), played by Wu Hao-sheng (吳皓昇).
Though the Chinese high officials who proclaimed the short-lived Taiwan Republic in response to the Treaty of Shimonoseki flee to China, leaving the Hakka militias to their own devices without sufficient rations, money or munitions, the resistance forces manage to keep the Japanese from advancing south.
The guerrillas persist and casualties mount. Carting supplies to the front with other villagers, Huang sees her husband, for the last time, before Wu and his men lose a decisive battle on Bagua Mountain (八卦山) in Changhua County, which saw about 4,700 Japanese and 14,000 Taiwanese fighters killed.
The film’s lack of funding — the budget was NT$60 million — is acutely felt. Instead of turning the more than modest funds into inspiration for imagination, director Hung took an aesthetic approach that is more slippers-and-spears television than cinematic by having some 30 extras running about aimlessly in the battle scenes, which are touted as the film’s high points.
The most bothering, if not purely absurd, part of the movie occurs in the scene when Aboriginal, Taiwanese and Hakka comrades are seen standing together in an act of unity. Used as human props, two extras in Aboriginal garb remain faceless in the shade throughout the scene, never to reappear.
1895’s cast members give passable performances with the exception of veteran actor Li Xing-wen (李興文), who plays a Taiwanese bandit and delivers well-appreciated comic relief without turning his character into caricature.
Young Japanese actor Koichiro Kijima fails to impress as Ogai Mori, the famed Japanese physician and novelist who was sent to Taiwan in 1895 and, in the film, attempts to give the occupying army a human face in the guise of a benevolent colonist.
Returning to the director’s seat after his feature debut, the rom-com Pure Accidents (純屬意外), director Hung is likely to go unnoticed with this ambitious, yet flaccid epic.
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
President William Lai’s (賴清德) March 13 national security speech marked a turning point. He signaled that the government was finally getting serious about a whole-of-society approach to defending the nation. The presidential office summarized his speech succinctly: “President Lai introduced 17 major strategies to respond to five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces: China’s threat to national sovereignty, its threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting Taiwan’s military, its threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan, its threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges, and its threats from
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
RSS