Krishnammal Jagannathan, 82, and her husband, Sankaralingam, 95, have spent a lifetime fighting for the rights of the deprived, especially the dalits, the former “untouchables,” who form the lowest rung of India’s ancient caste ladder.
The couple — named Wednesday among the recipients of the 2008 Right Livelihood Awards, often called the Alternative Nobel Prizes — have ensured over decades that thousands of hectares of land were distributed to landless dalit laborers in India’s southern state of Tamil Nadu.
The Jagannathans and their organization, Land for the Tillers’ Freedom, were cited by the awards jury for “realizing in practice the Gandhian vision of social justice and sustainable human development.”
Krishnammal Jagannathan comes from a landless dalit family and managed to get a university education in spite of her family’s poverty.
“I took a vow in my childhood that I must liberate dalits, specially women, from the clutches of the landowner,” she said while remembering the troubles of her mother, left a widow at 32 with 12 children.
“Six of them died, but she made every effort to see that the rest of us were brought up with some dignity, and she was poor and not educated,” Krishnammal Jagannathan said.
Despite India’s affirmative action policy, the dalits are still among the country’s poorest, and a majority of them remain landless laborers and manual scavengers.
Krishnammal Jagannathan said she would use the award money to build “beautiful houses” for the dalit women who work hard in paddy fields by day and then return to do housework and often are beaten by drunken husbands at night.
“I have succeeded in getting land for 13,000 women,” said the prize winner, who with her husband is to share the US$300,000 prize with the three other award recipients. “Now I want for them beautiful homes. The award money will help.”
“The award is a gift for my hard work over a long period,” she added.
And a very long period indeed, spanning more than 60 years.
Krishnammal Jagannathan met her husband when she joined Gandhi’s social reform movement in the 1920s. Sankaralingam Jagannathan was born into a wealthy family but left his studies in college to join India’s freedom movement led by Gandhi, of which the social reform element was an intrinsic part.
Gandhi’s philosophy of sarvodaya — which encompasses dignity of labor, an equitable distribution of wealth, communal self-sufficiency and individual freedom — inspired the couple to take up the cause of the rural poor, especially the landless dalits.
After India gained independence from British rule, the couple joined another Gandhian leader, Vinoba Bhave, in his bhoodan (gift land) movement where the activists walked the roads trying to persuade landlords to give one-sixth of their land to the landless.
The Jagannathans started their work on land reform in Tamil Nadu’s Thanjavur district in 1968 after the Kilvelmani massacre, in which 42 dalits, mostly women and children, were burned alive in a remote village in the district by a landlord’s hired goons over a wage dispute.
Land for the Tillers’ Freedom was an outcome of the Jagannathans’ decades-long struggle for the landless. It was founded in 1981 with the aim of bringing the landless and the landlord to the negotiating table and to obtain government and bank concessions for loans so the landless could buy land at reasonable prices.
The organization, which is committed to raising the social status and acceptability of the dalits, also helps the tillers farm collectively and repay loans through cooperative efforts.
And now the group is helping dalit laborers and farmers build livable houses, one more step in the Jagannathans’ efforts for a better life for dalits.
While Krishnammal Jagannathan is still active in the organization — she was on a bus traveling between two towns for it when called for this story — her husband is more frail and can no longer move around as before.
But the couple’s efforts continue to receive recognition, including one of the country’s highest awards, the Padmashri.
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
The Taipei Times last week reported that the Control Yuan said it had been “left with no choice” but to ask the Constitutional Court to rule on the constitutionality of the central government budget, which left it without a budget. Lost in the outrage over the cuts to defense and to the Constitutional Court were the cuts to the Control Yuan, whose operating budget was slashed by 96 percent. It is unable even to pay its utility bills, and in the press conference it convened on the issue, said that its department directors were paying out of pocket for gasoline
On March 13 President William Lai (賴清德) gave a national security speech noting the 20th year since the passing of China’s Anti-Secession Law (反分裂國家法) in March 2005 that laid the legal groundwork for an invasion of Taiwan. That law, and other subsequent ones, are merely political theater created by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to have something to point to so they can claim “we have to do it, it is the law.” The president’s speech was somber and said: “By its actions, China already satisfies the definition of a ‘foreign hostile force’ as provided in the Anti-Infiltration Act, which unlike
RSS