Following on the successes of Sofa, Fifi and Khaki, haute couture doyen Isabelle Wen (溫慶珠) has opened another place at which to see and be seen.
Located across the road from her popular nightspot Sofa, Wen’s latest culinary project opened about a month ago and is a lounge bar that sports a look that is the designer’s signature chic incarnate. As, apparently, is the food. Butterfly serves hot and spicy Sichuan cuisine said to come directly from the Wen family’s recipes.
As a lounge bar, Butterfly excels in mood-setting. The visual motif is a fusion of East and West, with a palette of unconventional indigo-blue and umber colors that exudes a sense of mystique and luxury. Chinese antiques rest comfortably among the vintage-looking sofa and chairs. A bar in the front offers a passable selection of cocktails, beer, and red and white wines. Oil paintings and illustrations on the walls lend an almost fairy-tale feel, while seemingly casually placed vintage screens and gauzy curtains hint at femininity. All in all, the interior is an amalgamation of Wen-esque fashion with a meticulous attention to detail.
As a restaurant, Butterfly is a chic version of Fifi, as the menus are almost identical and modernized to cater to contemporary diners. The food itself is, however, a disappointment. It lacks the pungent punch of the dishes served at Fifi, as well as the nuanced differences in flavors and spiciness.
My dining partners and I ordered several dishes off the recommendation list on the table. The chicken with red hot pepper (大千愛雞, NT$320) was appetizing, but an easy comparison could be made between the plate and fried chicken nuggets hawked by street food vendors. The Sichuan-style fried bamboo shoots (川味炒筍, NT$220) tasted exactly like its name suggests: fried bamboo shoots with chili.
Not so appetizing were the fried silver rolls (炸銀絲捲, NT$80), which were inexcusably dry. But the shredded beef in spicy sauce (毛澤東煮牛, NT$360) generated the most frowns. The oil-laden broth looked as if it came directly from a spicy hot pot and it failed to impress diners with a tolerance for spicy food, such as myself. Sad-looking slices of beef floated in the pot along with other elements that added no flavor to the dish. “The ingredients seem to have no relation to each other,” said one of my dining partners.
Some might say we were a picky bunch, because this establishment is more of a trendy lounge where fashionistas come to people-watch. On the Sunday night we visited, the young and chic patrons at Butterfly included a group of starlets and their escorts sitting in the back. In the corner, there was a trendy tribe of slender young women in short skits and tanned men who wore sunglasses in spite of the dim lighting.
Butterfly makes a glittery spot for trendoids in the city’s fashion hub. But its menu needs improvement before it becomes a must-visit restaurant for foodies.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and the country’s other political groups dare not offend religious groups, says Chen Lih-ming (陳立民), founder of the Taiwan Anti-Religion Alliance (台灣反宗教者聯盟). “It’s the same in other democracies, of course, but because political struggles in Taiwan are extraordinarily fierce, you’ll see candidates visiting several temples each day ahead of elections. That adds impetus to religion here,” says the retired college lecturer. In Japan’s most recent election, the Liberal Democratic Party lost many votes because of its ties to the Unification Church (“the Moonies”). Chen contrasts the progress made by anti-religion movements in
Taiwan doesn’t have a lot of railways, but its network has plenty of history. The government-owned entity that last year became the Taiwan Railway Corp (TRC) has been operating trains since 1891. During the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule, the colonial government made huge investments in rail infrastructure. The northern port city of Keelung was connected to Kaohsiung in the south. New lines appeared in Pingtung, Yilan and the Hualien-Taitung region. Railway enthusiasts exploring Taiwan will find plenty to amuse themselves. Taipei will soon gain its second rail-themed museum. Elsewhere there’s a number of endearing branch lines and rolling-stock collections, some
Last week the State Department made several small changes to its Web information on Taiwan. First, it removed a statement saying that the US “does not support Taiwan independence.” The current statement now reads: “We oppose any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side. We expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” In 2022 the administration of Joe Biden also removed that verbiage, but after a month of pressure from the People’s Republic of China (PRC), reinstated it. The American
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislative caucus convener Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) and some in the deep blue camp seem determined to ensure many of the recall campaigns against their lawmakers succeed. Widely known as the “King of Hualien,” Fu also appears to have become the king of the KMT. In theory, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) outranks him, but Han is supposed to be even-handed in negotiations between party caucuses — the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) says he is not — and Fu has been outright ignoring Han. Party Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) isn’t taking the lead on anything while Fu
RSS