Madonna says criticism over her adoption of a Malawian boy hurt so much that she compared it to birthing pains.
“It was painful, and it was a big struggle, and I didn’t understand it,” Madonna told reporters at the Cannes Film Festival last week. “But in the end I rationalized that, when a woman has a child and goes through natural childbirth, she suffers an enormous amount.
“So I sort of went through my own kind of birthing pains with dealing with the press on my front doorstep accusing me of kidnapping or whatever you want to call it,” she said.
PHOTO: AFP
Madonna was at the Cannes Film Festival to attend a gala benefit dinner for the American Foundation for AIDS Research, and to show I Am Because We Are, a documentary she produced and narrated that shows poverty, AIDS and other diseases devastating Malawi’s children.
Madonna, 49, has been raising David Banda, now 2, since 2006, when she met him while in the southern African nation establishing charity projects there.
Critics have said Madonna used her celebrity status to circumvent Malawian adoption laws — allegations she denies. Malawian law is fuzzy on foreign adoptions. Regulations only stipulate that prospective parents undergo an 18-to-24-month assessment period in Malawi, a rule that was bent when Madonna was allowed to take David to London.
PHOTO: EPA
The singer said she was “happy to be the guinea pig” for Malawian adoptions.
“Hopefully, after we get through this adoption, it will be easier for people to adopt children,” she said.
David’s mother died when he was a month old. His father has said he believed he could not care for him alone and that placing him in an orphanage was the best way to ensure David’s survival. The father has said he did not object to Madonna adopting David.
In California, a judge who is waiting for a state Supreme Court decision on whether he will preside over Phil Spector’s second murder trial went ahead on Thursday and scheduled it to begin in September.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Larry Paul Fidler said a trial date is needed, whether he presides or not. Lawyers for the music producer are challenging Fidler on grounds that he is biased against Spector.
Spector’s first trial ended in September with a deadlocked jury.
Spector, famed for his revolutionary “Wall of Sound” recording technique, is accused of killing actress Lana Clarkson at his Alhambra mansion on Feb. 3, 2003.
Fidler set a trial date of Sept. 29, and also set a hearing on motions for July 29.
Spector’s lawyer said it would be a week or two before the Supreme Court makes a decision.
Clarkson, 40, best known for her role in the cult film Barbarian Queen, was working as a hostess at the House of Blues when she met Spector and went home with him.
Spector, 69, attended Thursday’s hearing with his wife, Rachelle.
He was decked out in one of his signature frock-coat suits and wearing a large button on his lapel that read “Obama Rocks.” Clarkson’s mother, sister and a family lawyer sat in the front row of the courtroom. They are waiting for resolution of the criminal case before they pursue a wrongful-death lawsuit against Spector.
In its Supreme Court brief, the defense argued that Fidler’s rulings toward the end of the first trial were designed to ensure Spector’s conviction, in part to counter media reports that a celebrity could not be convicted in a Los Angeles court. Fidler has denied that and turned down a bid to remove himself from the second trial.
In another court decision, Wesley Snipes will be allowed to remain free on bail as he appeals three federal tax convictions.
Judge William Terrell Hodges granted Snipes’ motion for bail on Thursday pending appeal of his case, saying Snipes doesn’t pose a flight risk and is not a threat to the community.
The 45-year-old actor was sentenced last month to three years in prison on three misdemeanor counts of willful failure to file his income tax returns.
Snipes’ attorneys plan to argue before the 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals that the trial judge erred in several ways before and after his February conviction.
Snipes, the star of the Blade trilogy, White Men Can’t Jump, Jungle Fever and other films, hasn’t filed a tax return since 1998, the government alleged.
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
April 21 to April 27 Hsieh Er’s (謝娥) political fortunes were rising fast after she got out of jail and joined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in December 1945. Not only did she hold key positions in various committees, she was elected the only woman on the Taipei City Council and headed to Nanjing in 1946 as the sole Taiwanese female representative to the National Constituent Assembly. With the support of first lady Soong May-ling (宋美齡), she started the Taipei Women’s Association and Taiwan Provincial Women’s Association, where she
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,
RSS