The Chinese artist chosen to sculpt a giant statue of Martin Luther King Jr defended his work and charged critics with showing the kind of cultural bias and misunderstanding the civil rights leader fought against.
“I wasn’t trying to express that King was confrontational but that he was thoughtful,” Lei Yixin (雷宜鋅), the sculptor said in a telephone interview.
“He was a global leader and an example for humanity of the struggle for democracy and equality,” he added.
PHOTO: AFP
Some members of the US Commission of Fine Arts have called the work too confrontational and that it “recalls a genre of political sculpture that has recently been pulled down in other countries.”
But the Martin Luther King Jr Memorial Project Foundation has not asked Lei to alter his design for the 8.5m-tall statue, said Lei and Ed Jackson, the foundation’s executive architect. The sculpture is part of a privately funded US$100 million memorial in Washington slated for completion next year.
Lei’s design shows King emerging from but still partially embedded in a block of granite called the Mountain of Despair. King’s pose — based on a photograph taken by Flip Schulke, King’s official photographer — depicts the late civil rights leader with his arms crossed and his lips drawn in concentration.
Jackson said Monday that two members of the commission expressed concerns and he and other executives of the foundation were “trying to … make up in our own minds whether or not the suggestions can be accomplished without compromising the integrity of what Lei has already produced.”
The federal fine arts commission last year initially approved the design of the statue. But the panel, which must approve the monument’s final design, considered the sculpture “inappropriate as an expression of (King’s) legacy” and called for the design to be reworked, according to a letter written last month by commission secretary Thomas Luebke.
The Washington-based commission’s criticisms are the latest in a series of controversies surrounding the statue.
Last year, critics complained that Lei should not have been chosen to lead the project. Ed Dwight, a Colorado-based artist originally retained to help create the statue, has called Lei’s proposed statue “a shrinking, shriveled inadequate personage.”
Atlanta-based artist Gilbert Young said last year that Lei’s selection was “an insult to me and to all black people.” A letter on a Web site he set up — www.kingisours.com — argues that hiring Lei was “a travesty of justice” because Lei had sculpted statues of Mao Zedong (毛澤東), the late Chinese leader.
Mao’s legacy is troubled in China. He made education available to hundreds of millions of Chinese and elevated the position of women in society, but he also spurred violent persecution and oversaw economic failures that led to a massive famine.
In a telephone interview on Saturday, Lei called Young’s attacks biased and contrary to King’s message that people should not be judged on their race or nationality.
“Martin Luther King is a hero for the whole world,” Lei said. “People are still striving for equality and freedom, so his ideals remain strong everywhere.”
He added that while Mao “had made some mistakes, he isn’t as bad as some people think.”
“I understand why (Young) is critical, but he should study about Mao’s life before he judges me,” he said from his home in Changsha, the capital of China’s Hunan Province.
The Martin Luther King Jr National Memorial Project Foundation partly chose Lei because he is one of the world’s top sculptors for large human forms, Jackson said.
The foundation, which evaluated 900 entries from 52 countries, chose Lei’s design because it “captured the essence” of King’s struggle to achieve his ideals, he said.
To prepare for the job, Lei has studied everything he can find about King. As a child, his father read him King’s I Have a Dream speech. Since being chosen to sculpt King, he has searched out dozens of the Civil Rights leader’s less well-known writings.
“What has moved me most is that King combined non-violence and persistence to achieve his goals,” Lei said. “He was steadfast in his ideals.”
“My sculpture is not abstract. It attempts to represent King as the person he was.”
Addressing criticisms that an American should sculpt the statue, Lei said that it is common for top artists to work outside their home nations.
“Some of the world’s top architects are in China and they are contributing to society,” he said. “We shouldn’t look at the color of someone’s skin.”
Born in 1953 in China’s central Hunan Province, Lei taught himself to draw during the Cultural Revolution, when schools were closed and millions of youth were sent to work as farmers.
After universities reopened in 1977, he won a spot at the Guangzhou Academy of Fine Arts. After graduating he taught and worked on commissions, including several statues of Mao.
While many artists depicted Mao as heroic, Lei tried to show him “more as an ordinary person,” he said.
Lei has strong supporters in the US.
Isaac Newton Farris Jr, president and chief executive officer of the King Center in Atlanta and nephew of the civil rights leader, said that Lei’s design correctly depicts King’s legacy.
Jackson said the foundation chose Lei partly because he had experience working with granite, one of the hardest and most durable stones.
Lei said he is preparing a workspace in Hunan Province and will need at least six months to finish the work. “I don’t want this statue to become political,” he said. “I just want to focus on King’s ideals.”
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
President William Lai’s (賴清德) March 13 national security speech marked a turning point. He signaled that the government was finally getting serious about a whole-of-society approach to defending the nation. The presidential office summarized his speech succinctly: “President Lai introduced 17 major strategies to respond to five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces: China’s threat to national sovereignty, its threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting Taiwan’s military, its threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan, its threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges, and its threats from
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
RSS