This week, the potential of the Internet to expose and disgrace when marriages fall apart came into stark relief as Tricia Walsh Smith, who is being divorced by Philip Smith, a theater executive, put a video on YouTube announcing that they had never had sex, and yet she had found him hoarding Viagra, pornography and condoms.
Not surprisingly, Philip Smith’s lawyer, David Aronson, called the video “appalling” and said: “Mr. Smith is a very private person. This is obviously embarrassing.”
But in an era when more than one in 10 adult Internet users in the US have blogs, according to the Pew Internet and American Life Project, many people are using the Web to tell their side of a marital saga — and of course, in separation, one person’s truth can be another’s lie. Despite the legal end of a marriage, the confessions can stretch toward eternity in a steady stream of enraged or despondent postings.
PHOTO: NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE
Sometimes the postings are furtive. But even when the ex-spouse is well aware that he or she is starring in an angry blog and sues to stop it, recent rulings in New York and Vermont have showed the courts reluctant to intervene.
For the blogger, the writing can be therapeutic.
Until the morning her husband, David Sals, told her he “was done” with their marriage, Jennifer Neal had portrayed him so lovingly on her blog that he was called DearSweetDave.
PHOTO: NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE
By the afternoon of that October day last year, Neal had shared what she portrayed as his perfidy with the 55,000 regular readers she says visit NakedJen.com. Soon after, readers came to know him by a far less flattering name, and as the guy whose insensitivity made Jen so sick that she was throwing up every day and so poor that she lost her house in Santa Cruz, California.
And when a despairing Jen discovered in February that her ex-husband had put his information up on Match.com, an Internet dating service, she linked to it from her blog, giving her readers a chance to share their thoughts.
Sals protested, but Neal held firm: “If he wants to tell his side of the story, he should get his own blog.”
Sals said that he had stopped reading her blog but that his family still sometimes looked at it and got upset. “I’ve never tried to make her stop, but I’ve definitely had to adjust to giving up my privacy,” he said.
It is impossible to say just how many people are blogging about divorce, but the number of personal blogs has quadrupled in five years, according to Pew. Mary Madden, a senior researcher with the Pew Project who specializes in online relationships, said that during emotionally charged times, some people go to the Web. “It is a blank slate to unload all the frustrations and emotions of a personal crisis,” Madden said.
There will certainly be consequences down the line of all this sharing. “The long-term impact of the persistent information on line has not been fully felt,” Madden said.
“People tend to think that they are blogging for a small group of friends or that they are anonymous,” she said. But that is not really the case, she said, because “all it takes is one friend posting a link to your blog to out you.”
Laurie, a Manhattan mother, started podcasting DivorcingDaze.com during her divorce in 2006. Each week Laurie and a divorced friend have a glass of wine and tape their discussions of the day’s topics — spas, their boyfriends, Eliot Spitzer — and then post to the web.
Laurie never told he ex-husband she was doing the programs because they were intended as therapy and not retribution, she said. She does not use her last name or her ex-husband’s in her talks and asked that both names be withheld for this article.
Still, Laurie maintains no pretense of impartiality. The 10,000 monthly listeners who download DivorcingDaze episodes have heard Laurie say she discovered her ex-husband was having an affair with his boss from e-mail on his BlackBerry, and that her ex-husband had told his older daughter he wasn’t cheating because their marriage, in his mind, was already over.
“I am one 100 percent aware that if he told his version of the marriage, it would be completely different,” Laurie said.
So different in fact, that when her husband did find out about the podcasts last year, he sued her. He argued that they included statements that were “obnoxious, derogatory or offensive” and that it violated the terms of the divorce settlement that she not “harass” or “malign” him.
In a decision only weeks ago, however, a New York state Supreme Court justice said his complaints were not grounds for blocking the podcast. While Laurie’s statements may be “ill-advised and do no promote co-parenting,” the court wrote, they were covered by the First Amendment.
Obviously, divorce lawyers are taking note. Deborah Lans, of Cohen Lans, a Manhattan law firm with a thriving matrimonial practice, said, “The last thing you want to see is angry people making uncontrolled statements.”
Lans said her divorce agreements included a confidentiality provision that forbid either party from publishing even fictionalized accounts of the marriage, but not every lawyer insists on that. The judge in Laurie’s case explicitly noted that their agreement did not have such a provision.
Earlier this year, a court in Vermont did tell William Krasnansky to take down his lightly disguised account of his divorce, in which he described his ex-wife as mentally unstable and blamed her for forcing him to sell their home at “a ruinous loss.” Krasnanksy’s ex-wife had complained that it was “defamatory.” But weeks later, after a firestorm of criticism, the court reversed itself and gave him the right to continue to publish.
For some bitter ex-spouses, the delight of revenge is not the only reward. Writing about divorce can be good for business.
“The bloggers who are doing the best are those who are injecting their personal lives,” said Penelope Trunk, the author of the Brazen Careerist blog, who has written frequently in the past year about the collapse of her 15-year marriage.
Trunk wrote about going to what she thought was their first marriage counseling session only to discover it was a divorce lawyer’s office. That was one of her most popular posts.
More painfully, she has written about the problems of a son who has Asperger’s syndrome and said that both she and her husband believed the challenges of raising him helped cause their divorce.
But this kind of brutal honesty is not a good idea for children, especially since most harbor feelings of guilt about their parents’ divorce anyway, said Irene Goldenberg, a professor emeritus of psychiatry at the University of California, Los Angeles.
“It is not good for children to get personal information in that way,” Goldenberg said. “And people have to consider doing things in the heat of the moment. The way they feel now will not be how they feel in two years, and there is no way it can be retrieved.”
Truck disagrees.
“It is a generational issue,” she said, “We think it will be a big deal, but it won’t be to them. By the time they are old enough to read it, they will have spent their entire life online. It will be like, ‘Oh yeah, I expected that.’”
On the Net: Tricia Walsh Smith’s post can be found at www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pn11tK1vHw
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
President William Lai’s (賴清德) March 13 national security speech marked a turning point. He signaled that the government was finally getting serious about a whole-of-society approach to defending the nation. The presidential office summarized his speech succinctly: “President Lai introduced 17 major strategies to respond to five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces: China’s threat to national sovereignty, its threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting Taiwan’s military, its threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan, its threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges, and its threats from
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
RSS