In a rare venture abroad, Taipei’s National Palace Museum (NPM, 國立故宮博物院) is exhibiting 120 of its grandest masterpieces at Vienna’s Kunsthistorisches Museum from yesterday to May 13.
“It is a very great event in the history of our house,” museum director Wilfried Seipel said. “It is the culmination of our work to intensify contacts with Asia.”
His Taiwanese counterpart, NPM director Lin Mun-lee (林曼麗), said the exhibition was part of an exchange of high cultures in East and West. “The hard work of the past four years in organizing this exhibition paid off,” she added.
PHOTO: CNA
Despite all assurances by organizers to leave political aspects aside and focus on the priceless cultural heritage, the exhibition could not escape political realities.
Taiwan is hesitant to let the irreplaceable artworks, moved to Taiwan in 1948 and 1949 by Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), out of sight fearing confiscation attempts by China.
Japan, where Chinese art is generally held in high esteem, tried in vain for many years to persuade Taiwan to show some of its objects there, but was refused because of lack of legal guarantees.
Austria, like Germany, the US and France — the only other venues of exhibitions — gave the legal guarantees required for such an exhibition, Seipel stressed.
Yet the exhibition did not fail to create some diplomatic hiccups. In an attempt to unruffle feathers, Seipel stressed that the exhibition did not show Taiwan’s national culture, but Chinese history and asked for understanding on the part of Chinese authorities.
“It would be too strong to speak of intervention ... but there were issues that we were able to solve,” Seipel said.
The exhibition itself is confined to two rooms in the sprawling Vienna museum and may be too small to satisfy Chinese art enthusiasts, but the exceptional quality and wide scope of the exhibited objects gives a good introduction to the NPM’s collection of 650,000 pieces.
More than half of the objects in the exhibition have never been viewed outside Taiwan before. The exhibition shows several different aspects of Chinese culture — focusing on painting and calligraphy as well as jades, curator Renate Noda said.
Ceramics and bronzes are taking a back seat in the exhibition that has fewer, yet stunning, works of art.
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
April 21 to April 27 Hsieh Er’s (謝娥) political fortunes were rising fast after she got out of jail and joined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in December 1945. Not only did she hold key positions in various committees, she was elected the only woman on the Taipei City Council and headed to Nanjing in 1946 as the sole Taiwanese female representative to the National Constituent Assembly. With the support of first lady Soong May-ling (宋美齡), she started the Taipei Women’s Association and Taiwan Provincial Women’s Association, where she
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,
RSS