In a rare venture abroad, Taipei’s National Palace Museum (NPM, 國立故宮博物院) is exhibiting 120 of its grandest masterpieces at Vienna’s Kunsthistorisches Museum from yesterday to May 13.
“It is a very great event in the history of our house,” museum director Wilfried Seipel said. “It is the culmination of our work to intensify contacts with Asia.”
His Taiwanese counterpart, NPM director Lin Mun-lee (林曼麗), said the exhibition was part of an exchange of high cultures in East and West. “The hard work of the past four years in organizing this exhibition paid off,” she added.
PHOTO: CNA
Despite all assurances by organizers to leave political aspects aside and focus on the priceless cultural heritage, the exhibition could not escape political realities.
Taiwan is hesitant to let the irreplaceable artworks, moved to Taiwan in 1948 and 1949 by Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), out of sight fearing confiscation attempts by China.
Japan, where Chinese art is generally held in high esteem, tried in vain for many years to persuade Taiwan to show some of its objects there, but was refused because of lack of legal guarantees.
Austria, like Germany, the US and France — the only other venues of exhibitions — gave the legal guarantees required for such an exhibition, Seipel stressed.
Yet the exhibition did not fail to create some diplomatic hiccups. In an attempt to unruffle feathers, Seipel stressed that the exhibition did not show Taiwan’s national culture, but Chinese history and asked for understanding on the part of Chinese authorities.
“It would be too strong to speak of intervention ... but there were issues that we were able to solve,” Seipel said.
The exhibition itself is confined to two rooms in the sprawling Vienna museum and may be too small to satisfy Chinese art enthusiasts, but the exceptional quality and wide scope of the exhibited objects gives a good introduction to the NPM’s collection of 650,000 pieces.
More than half of the objects in the exhibition have never been viewed outside Taiwan before. The exhibition shows several different aspects of Chinese culture — focusing on painting and calligraphy as well as jades, curator Renate Noda said.
Ceramics and bronzes are taking a back seat in the exhibition that has fewer, yet stunning, works of art.
If you are a Western and especially a white foreign resident of Taiwan, you’ve undoubtedly had the experience of Taiwanese assuming you to be an English teacher. There are cultural and economic reasons for this, but one of the greatest determinants is the narrow range of work permit categories that exist for Taiwan’s foreign residents, which has in turn created an unofficial caste system for foreigners. Until recently, laowai (老外) — the Mandarin term for “foreigners,” which also implies citizenship in a rich, Western country and distinguishable from brown-skinned, southeast Asian migrant laborers, or wailao (外勞) — could only ever
Sept. 23 to Sept. 29 The construction of the Babao Irrigation Canal (八堡圳) was not going well. Large-scale irrigation structures were almost unheard of in Taiwan in 1709, but Shih Shih-pang (施世榜) was determined to divert water from the Jhuoshuei River (濁水溪) to the Changhua plain, where he owned land, to promote wet rice cultivation. According to legend, a mysterious old man only known as Mr. Lin (林先生) appeared and taught Shih how to use woven conical baskets filled with rocks called shigou (石笱) to control water diversion, as well as other techniques such as surveying terrain by observing shadows during
In recent weeks news outlets have been reporting on rising rents. Last year they hit a 27 year high. It seems only a matter of time before they become a serious political issue. Fortunately, there is a whole political party that is laser focused on this issue, the Taiwan Statebuilding Party (TSP). They could have had a seat or two in the legislature, or at least, be large enough to attract media attention to the rent issue from time to time. Unfortunately, in the last election, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) acted as a vote sink for
This is a film about two “fools,” according to the official synopsis. But admirable ones. In his late thirties, A-jen quits his high-paying tech job and buys a plot of land in the countryside, hoping to use municipal trash to revitalize the soil that has been contaminated by decades of pesticide and chemical fertilizer use. Brother An-ho, in his 60s, on the other hand, began using organic methods to revive the dead soil on his land 30 years ago despite the ridicule of his peers, methodically picking each pest off his produce by hand without killing them out of respect