In a rare venture abroad, Taipei’s National Palace Museum (NPM, 國立故宮博物院) is exhibiting 120 of its grandest masterpieces at Vienna’s Kunsthistorisches Museum from yesterday to May 13.
“It is a very great event in the history of our house,” museum director Wilfried Seipel said. “It is the culmination of our work to intensify contacts with Asia.”
His Taiwanese counterpart, NPM director Lin Mun-lee (林曼麗), said the exhibition was part of an exchange of high cultures in East and West. “The hard work of the past four years in organizing this exhibition paid off,” she added.
PHOTO: CNA
Despite all assurances by organizers to leave political aspects aside and focus on the priceless cultural heritage, the exhibition could not escape political realities.
Taiwan is hesitant to let the irreplaceable artworks, moved to Taiwan in 1948 and 1949 by Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), out of sight fearing confiscation attempts by China.
Japan, where Chinese art is generally held in high esteem, tried in vain for many years to persuade Taiwan to show some of its objects there, but was refused because of lack of legal guarantees.
Austria, like Germany, the US and France — the only other venues of exhibitions — gave the legal guarantees required for such an exhibition, Seipel stressed.
Yet the exhibition did not fail to create some diplomatic hiccups. In an attempt to unruffle feathers, Seipel stressed that the exhibition did not show Taiwan’s national culture, but Chinese history and asked for understanding on the part of Chinese authorities.
“It would be too strong to speak of intervention ... but there were issues that we were able to solve,” Seipel said.
The exhibition itself is confined to two rooms in the sprawling Vienna museum and may be too small to satisfy Chinese art enthusiasts, but the exceptional quality and wide scope of the exhibited objects gives a good introduction to the NPM’s collection of 650,000 pieces.
More than half of the objects in the exhibition have never been viewed outside Taiwan before. The exhibition shows several different aspects of Chinese culture — focusing on painting and calligraphy as well as jades, curator Renate Noda said.
Ceramics and bronzes are taking a back seat in the exhibition that has fewer, yet stunning, works of art.
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
Mirror mirror on the wall, what’s the fairest Disney live-action remake of them all? Wait, mirror. Hold on a second. Maybe choosing from the likes of Alice in Wonderland (2010), Mulan (2020) and The Lion King (2019) isn’t such a good idea. Mirror, on second thought, what’s on Netflix? Even the most devoted fans would have to acknowledge that these have not been the most illustrious illustrations of Disney magic. At their best (Pete’s Dragon? Cinderella?) they breathe life into old classics that could use a little updating. At their worst, well, blue Will Smith. Given the rapacious rate of remakes in modern
RSS