The recent revelation that some 100 artworks long believed to be Andy Warhol originals are probably fakes has raised a slew of questions in the art world, notably about the work of experts, but inquiries into the affair have so far met a wall of silence.
The key person in the tale - who reportedly ordered the fakes to be made in 1990, three years after Warhol's death - died in 2006. He was Pontus Hulten, an internationally renowned art expert and the former head of the Pompidou Centre's modern art museum in Paris and Stockholm's modern art museum Moderna Museet.
Neither the Andy Warhol Foundation, nor the Andy Warhol Art Authentication Board would comment. Two auction houses also declined.
The works in question are Brillo Boxes, pieces inspired by the real cardboard packaging of Brillo soap pads from the US. They sell for up to US$100,000.
Swedish daily Expressen broke the story in mid-2007 after months of research.
Moderna Museet then confirmed in November that more than 100 copies were made in 1990, and said it planned to withdraw its six Brillo Boxes that were part of that batch.
The copies were reportedly made for an exhibition in Saint Petersburg.
People questioned were cautious not to smear Hulten's stellar reputation, but the revelation casts serious doubts over his actions.
How could he have sold Brillo Boxes which he claimed were originals from 1968 while others say they were made after Warhol's death? Why did he say they were made in Sweden and displayed as part of a 1968 Warhol exhibition at Moderna Museet, when several sources insist that is untrue? In 1994, Hulten sold 40 Brillo Boxes to an art collector in Antwerpen, Belgium, Ronny van de Velde.
In a certificate of sale, he wrote: "These Brillo Boxes were produced in Stockholm in 1968, according to Andy Warhol's instructions. These Brillo Boxes were included in the exhibition Andy Warhol at the Moderna Museet, Stockholm, February to March 1968."
"I can't confirm that. He remembers incorrectly," said Olle Granath, the permanent secretary of the Swedish royal academy of fine arts and Hulten's assistant during the 1968 exhibition.
"Pontus had grown very old" by then, he suggested.
Expressen journalist Mikael Oelander added: "There's not one document proving that the 100 Brillo Boxes were made for the exhibition" in Stockholm in 1968.
It is, however, certain that when Hulten had the boxes made in 1990, it was not his intention to dupe the world. It was a widely known fact that they were being made to be part of an exhibition.
"It is clear that they were not made to pretend to be originals, but were made as part of the scenography for an exhibition," Granath said.
Another Expressen journalist, Christian Holmen, said "it was no secret" when they were made.
So why did Hulten say they were from 1968? "I wish Pontus Hulten was still alive so he could provide us with an explanation," said the current curator of Moderna Museet, Lars Nittve.
The affair also casts a shadow over the Andy Warhol Art Authentication Board, which, according to Expressen, issued authenticity certificates for many of the copies.
According to Granath, many of Warhol's authentic works were in fact not made by the artist himself.
"I'm glad I'm not a member of a committee that authenticates Andy Warhol's works. It was always someone else who made his artworks," he said.
The Andy Warhol Art Authentication Board did not respond requests for an interview.
"The board is looking into this issue," the board's lawyer, Ronald Spencer, said, "and I expect them to write to existing owners shortly." In April, a Brillo Box was sold at Christie's auction house for US$131,000.
The text describing the artwork in the catalogue said the piece was made in 1968 and that its previous owner was Pontus Hulten.
Was it a copy made in 1990? The auction house had no comment, and its spokesman Matthew Paton stressed that Christie's sells only pieces authenticated by the Andy Warhol Art Authentication Board.
Sotheby's auction house also declined to comment.
"Despite the statute of limitations, both auction houses are concerned by claims, they're concerned for their reputation," said American lawyer Peter Stern, who specializes in art cases and serves as chairman of the board for the Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts organization.
The recent revelation was very serious, Stern said, especially for the board.
However, he noted that the Andy Warhol Art Authentication Board did not risk legal proceedings if it was found to have authenticated fakes, as it was protected by special legal clauses.
As for the consequences for Warhol's reputation, Stern said there was little risk there either.
"The interest in his artwork is so substantial. It just means that buyers have to be more careful. I really don't think it will have an impact on Warhol's reputation or on the Warhol market," Stern added.
From censoring “poisonous books” to banning “poisonous languages,” the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) tried hard to stamp out anything that might conflict with its agenda during its almost 40 years of martial law. To mark 228 Peace Memorial Day, which commemorates the anti-government uprising in 1947, which was violently suppressed, I visited two exhibitions detailing censorship in Taiwan: “Silenced Pages” (禁書時代) at the National 228 Memorial Museum and “Mandarin Monopoly?!” (請說國語) at the National Human Rights Museum. In both cases, the authorities framed their targets as “evils that would threaten social mores, national stability and their anti-communist cause, justifying their actions
Taiwanese chip-making giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) plans to invest a whopping US$100 billion in the US, after US President Donald Trump threatened to slap tariffs on overseas-made chips. TSMC is the world’s biggest maker of the critical technology that has become the lifeblood of the global economy. This week’s announcement takes the total amount TSMC has pledged to invest in the US to US$165 billion, which the company says is the “largest single foreign direct investment in US history.” It follows Trump’s accusations that Taiwan stole the US chip industry and his threats to impose tariffs of up to 100 percent
In the run-up to World War II, Admiral Wilhelm Canaris, head of Abwehr, Nazi Germany’s military intelligence service, began to fear that Hitler would launch a war Germany could not win. Deeply disappointed by the sell-out of the Munich Agreement in 1938, Canaris conducted several clandestine operations that were aimed at getting the UK to wake up, invest in defense and actively support the nations Hitler planned to invade. For example, the “Dutch war scare” of January 1939 saw fake intelligence leaked to the British that suggested that Germany was planning to invade the Netherlands in February and acquire airfields
The launch of DeepSeek-R1 AI by Hangzhou-based High-Flyer and subsequent impact reveals a lot about the state of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) today, both good and bad. It touches on the state of Chinese technology, innovation, intellectual property theft, sanctions busting smuggling, propaganda, geopolitics and as with everything in China, the power politics of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). PLEASING XI JINPING DeepSeek’s creation is almost certainly no accident. In 2015 CCP Secretary General Xi Jinping (習近平) launched his Made in China 2025 program intended to move China away from low-end manufacturing into an innovative technological powerhouse, with Artificial Intelligence
RSS