The recent revelation that some 100 artworks long believed to be Andy Warhol originals are probably fakes has raised a slew of questions in the art world, notably about the work of experts, but inquiries into the affair have so far met a wall of silence.
The key person in the tale - who reportedly ordered the fakes to be made in 1990, three years after Warhol's death - died in 2006. He was Pontus Hulten, an internationally renowned art expert and the former head of the Pompidou Centre's modern art museum in Paris and Stockholm's modern art museum Moderna Museet.
Neither the Andy Warhol Foundation, nor the Andy Warhol Art Authentication Board would comment. Two auction houses also declined.
The works in question are Brillo Boxes, pieces inspired by the real cardboard packaging of Brillo soap pads from the US. They sell for up to US$100,000.
Swedish daily Expressen broke the story in mid-2007 after months of research.
Moderna Museet then confirmed in November that more than 100 copies were made in 1990, and said it planned to withdraw its six Brillo Boxes that were part of that batch.
The copies were reportedly made for an exhibition in Saint Petersburg.
People questioned were cautious not to smear Hulten's stellar reputation, but the revelation casts serious doubts over his actions.
How could he have sold Brillo Boxes which he claimed were originals from 1968 while others say they were made after Warhol's death? Why did he say they were made in Sweden and displayed as part of a 1968 Warhol exhibition at Moderna Museet, when several sources insist that is untrue? In 1994, Hulten sold 40 Brillo Boxes to an art collector in Antwerpen, Belgium, Ronny van de Velde.
In a certificate of sale, he wrote: "These Brillo Boxes were produced in Stockholm in 1968, according to Andy Warhol's instructions. These Brillo Boxes were included in the exhibition Andy Warhol at the Moderna Museet, Stockholm, February to March 1968."
"I can't confirm that. He remembers incorrectly," said Olle Granath, the permanent secretary of the Swedish royal academy of fine arts and Hulten's assistant during the 1968 exhibition.
"Pontus had grown very old" by then, he suggested.
Expressen journalist Mikael Oelander added: "There's not one document proving that the 100 Brillo Boxes were made for the exhibition" in Stockholm in 1968.
It is, however, certain that when Hulten had the boxes made in 1990, it was not his intention to dupe the world. It was a widely known fact that they were being made to be part of an exhibition.
"It is clear that they were not made to pretend to be originals, but were made as part of the scenography for an exhibition," Granath said.
Another Expressen journalist, Christian Holmen, said "it was no secret" when they were made.
So why did Hulten say they were from 1968? "I wish Pontus Hulten was still alive so he could provide us with an explanation," said the current curator of Moderna Museet, Lars Nittve.
The affair also casts a shadow over the Andy Warhol Art Authentication Board, which, according to Expressen, issued authenticity certificates for many of the copies.
According to Granath, many of Warhol's authentic works were in fact not made by the artist himself.
"I'm glad I'm not a member of a committee that authenticates Andy Warhol's works. It was always someone else who made his artworks," he said.
The Andy Warhol Art Authentication Board did not respond requests for an interview.
"The board is looking into this issue," the board's lawyer, Ronald Spencer, said, "and I expect them to write to existing owners shortly." In April, a Brillo Box was sold at Christie's auction house for US$131,000.
The text describing the artwork in the catalogue said the piece was made in 1968 and that its previous owner was Pontus Hulten.
Was it a copy made in 1990? The auction house had no comment, and its spokesman Matthew Paton stressed that Christie's sells only pieces authenticated by the Andy Warhol Art Authentication Board.
Sotheby's auction house also declined to comment.
"Despite the statute of limitations, both auction houses are concerned by claims, they're concerned for their reputation," said American lawyer Peter Stern, who specializes in art cases and serves as chairman of the board for the Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts organization.
The recent revelation was very serious, Stern said, especially for the board.
However, he noted that the Andy Warhol Art Authentication Board did not risk legal proceedings if it was found to have authenticated fakes, as it was protected by special legal clauses.
As for the consequences for Warhol's reputation, Stern said there was little risk there either.
"The interest in his artwork is so substantial. It just means that buyers have to be more careful. I really don't think it will have an impact on Warhol's reputation or on the Warhol market," Stern added.
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
April 21 to April 27 Hsieh Er’s (謝娥) political fortunes were rising fast after she got out of jail and joined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in December 1945. Not only did she hold key positions in various committees, she was elected the only woman on the Taipei City Council and headed to Nanjing in 1946 as the sole Taiwanese female representative to the National Constituent Assembly. With the support of first lady Soong May-ling (宋美齡), she started the Taipei Women’s Association and Taiwan Provincial Women’s Association, where she
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,
RSS