American Robin Winkler (文魯彬) wears two hats. The 53-year-old is an environmentalist and capitalist.
He was ousted from his job as a commercial lawyer in Taiwan from the firm he had founded. Shortly after, he was diagnosed with terminal lung cancer and moved to Hualien. While there, he communed with nature, miraculously recovered, and realized that mankind has become pathologically destructive in its pursuit of success. He then became a crusader for the environment and a Taiwanese citizen to boot.
That's half the story. Long before the diagnosis, Winkler had been reading books such as Beyond Civilization (Daniel Quinn) and The Ecology of Commerce (Paul Hawken) — books that tap into things that he had "always felt but couldn't articulate." His firm had fallen apart in the first place because he had been giving away a lot of money.
PHOTO: CHRIS PECHSTEDT, TAIPEI TIMES
His new business, Winkler Partners (博仲法律事務所) occupies Vice-President Annette Lu's former residence on Chongqing South Road, where a well-dressed staff serves "Fortune 500-type" clients — many of which engage in the kind of "unsustainable" practices that will make the century "pretty grim."
Winkler looks out of place there.
He takes commercial cases even less often than he dresses up.
One former employee describes him as a brilliant but demanding and sometimes harsh boss. He is extraordinarily articulate, maintains a professional carriage and claims to "not ever rest." ("The distinction between work and leisure is a really warped idea," he explains. "It's a culture of schizophrenia.")
Much of his work is through Wild at Heart (en.wildatheart.org.tw, 台灣蠻野心足生態協會), the small environmental legal-defense group holed up in what used to be Lu's staff's quarters and supported by the law firm. "This is how I make my money, and this is how I spend my money," Winkler likes to say as he flips over his double-sided business card, which represents an integral part of the firm's philosophy.
If there is a contradiction in using money from big international clients to fund an organization that is wary of the very idea of foreign investment, Winkler is philosophical about it.
He doesn't consider himself to be anti-business. On the contrary, he holds — somewhat perversely — that "no amount of effort by environmental groups, the government, or individuals can hope to stop the ruin ... The responsibility fall[s] to us — business."
This responsibility, he believes, is simple: "Identify what we're doing that's not sustainable and stop doing it." As to what exactly that would mean, "anyone who thinks they know is full of shit."
At the very least, though, it would mean giving up the idea of short-term growth as the primary focus of economic policy and business management ("'sustainable growth' is a contradiction in terms"). Winkler believes that a collision between civilization and the limits of natural resources is inevitable.
Such beliefs haven't always made him popular.
As an appointee to the EPA's environmental-impact assessment (EIA) commission, a body that regulates new construction and development projects, he has very publicly butted heads with the Executive Yuan over projects like the Central Taiwan Science Park (中部科學工業區), a much-touted economic growth engine. Winkler and other "environmentally committed" commissioners have been accused of overstepping their bounds. They retort that the government, unused to commissioners asserting political independence, is applying pressure "without any legal authority whatsoever."
The right to make statements like this without fear of deportation, or accusations of being a meddling foreigner, was part of what got Winkler, after more than 20 years as a foreigner, to give up his US passport for a Taiwanese one, in 2003.
It's a right he exercises in countless meetings, speaking to vast congregations or a single legislator in soft Mandarin, making a point of referring to "we Taiwanese."
He had romantic reasons for becoming Taiwanese as well. Having a US passport, and the ability to leave "if things get bad," is like being "in two places at once," and he wanted to be fully here, where he had spent half his life, built his career and met his wife, a Taiwanese-born publisher.
And, of course, there was Taiwan's environment, hectare for hectare one of the most diverse in the world. He had always loved it, down to the rain and humidity. When he first came to Taipei nearly 30 years ago, the capital's verdant surroundings were one of his chief reasons for staying.
Like the first Western environmentalists, Winkler is motivated by love. He believes that it is simply wrong to profit at the expense of the environment and the other beings that inhabit the Earth or future generations of inhabitants. He quotes the 2002 Basic Environment Act "almost like poetry":
"'Sustainable development' means satisfying contemporary needs without sacrificing the ability of future generations to satisfy their needs ... . In the event that economic, technological or social development has a seriously negative impact on the environment or there is concern of endangering the environment, the protection of the environment shall prevail."
Those words represent a victory of sorts, but after what he sees as the Democratic Progressive Party's neglect of its roots in the environmental movement, he doubts that any government can live up to them — at least not as long as business, in its current form, remains Taiwan's lifeline to the international community.
The opinion of the international community is no less dreary. Taiwan did terribly in Columbia and Yale universities' 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index, for example. One of the organizers admitted the ranking was probably harsh, but "where there's smoke, there's fire," Winkler said. And there is a lot of smoke in Taiwan. Of 146 countries surveyed, only North Korea fared worse.
The tropic of cancer bisects the city of Chiayi (嘉義). The morning heat is, predictably, intense. But the sky is blue and hued with promise. Travelers brave the heat to pose for photos outside the carriages lined up at the end of platform one. The pervasive excitement is understandable. HISTORIC RAILWAY The Alishan Forest Railway (阿里山森林鐵路) was engineered by the Japanese to carry timber from the interior to the coast. Construction began in 1906. In 1912, it opened to traffic, although the line has been lengthened several times since. As early as the 1930s, the line had developed a secondary function as
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) National Congress tomorrow will potentially be one of the most consequential in the party’s history. Since the founding of the DPP until the late 2000s or early 2010s, the party was riven with factional infighting, at times getting very ugly and very public. For readers curious to know more about the context of the factions and who they are, two previous columns explore them in depth: “The powerful political force that vanished from the English press,” April 23, 2024 and “Introducing the powerful DPP factions,” April 27, 2024. In 2008, a relatively unknown mid-level former
In Taiwan there are two economies: the shiny high tech export economy epitomized by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) and its outsized effect on global supply chains, and the domestic economy, driven by construction and powered by flows of gravel, sand and government contracts. The latter supports the former: we can have an economy without TSMC, but we can’t have one without construction. The labor shortage has heavily impacted public construction in Taiwan. For example, the first phase of the MRT Wanda Line in Taipei, originally slated for next year, has been pushed back to 2027. The government
July 22 to July 28 The Love River’s (愛河) four-decade run as the host of Kaohsiung’s annual dragon boat races came to an abrupt end in 1971 — the once pristine waterway had become too polluted. The 1970 event was infamous for the putrid stench permeating the air, exacerbated by contestants splashing water and sludge onto the shore and even the onlookers. The relocation of the festivities officially marked the “death” of the river, whose condition had rapidly deteriorated during the previous decade. The myriad factories upstream were only partly to blame; as Kaohsiung’s population boomed in the 1960s, all household