A few years ago, scientists at Cargill Inc learned how to make rigid, transparent plastics from corn sugars. There was just one problem: They cost a lot more than the oil-based plastics they would replace.
But that was before the price of oil shot up and companies came under pressure from consumers and investors to find economically sound ways to adopt "green" packaging and other environmentally friendly products and processes. This year, Wal-Mart, Wild Oats Market, and a host of other retailers, as well as food suppliers like Del Monte and Newman's Own Organics, have all embraced corn-based packaging for fresh produce.
Sales at NatureWorks, the Cargill subsidiary that makes the plastic, grew 200 percent in the first half of this year over the period last year. "The early adopters were more influenced by environmental concerns than costs," said Kathleen Bader, chairman of NatureWorks. "But now we're competitive with petrochemicals, too."
PHOTO: NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE
Cargill is one of several companies profiting from the concerns -- of shareholders, communities, and consumers alike -- about global warming, leaking landfills, and other potential environmental hazards. Huge companies like General Electric and Chevron now have separate businesses to market what they are calling environment-friendly products.
And new companies and university projects appear each day. Cornell
University's College of Engineering, for one, expects to have a commercial process for using bacteria to recoup energy from wastewater treatment within three years.
"There are a lot of creative types looking for the next big thing," said Robert Sheppard, deputy director for corporate programs at Clean Air-Cool Planet, a nonprofit environmental education organization. "Well, these days, environment is it."
It is impossible to quantify the environmental industry. Many of the newer companies are privately held. And many "green" products -- more efficient power generators, say, or biodegradable plastics -- are parts of other industries.
But investors are clearly funneling ever more money into green technologies. Last year, the California Public Employees Retirement System, or Calpers, said it would invest US$200 million in what it called the "burgeoning environmental technology sector."
This year, 27 members of the Investor Network on Climate Risk promised to invest US$1 billion in companies with green products. "The environmental industry is about to take off, as more investors realize that they can reap returns from cleaner technologies," said Dan Bakal, director of electric power programs at Ceres, a coalition of investors and environmental organizations that runs the investor network.
cutting edge
Entrepreneurs say the change is palpable. Northern Biodiesel, a small company in Ontario, New York, recently got financing for a plant to turn cooking oils and agricultural waste into diesel fuel. "Banks used to dismiss me as a tree-hugger when I tried to borrow for an environmentally advantaged product," said Bob Bechtold, the
company's vice president.
In one sense, the current environmental boon is a replay of the 1970s, when regulations spawned a profitable industry to sell electrostatic precipitators, air scrubbers, and other air cleaning devices. New federal rules limiting diesel emissions are spurring sales now, too.
But this time, other powerful motivators are at play. The US did not sign the Kyoto treaty regulating greenhouse gases, but companies feel pressure to reduce gas emissions in order to comfortably do business in countries that did sign. Moreover, "people know that regulations will come here, too," said Judi Greenwald, director of innovative solutions at the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, a nonprofit research group.
Even without rules to force their hands, companies are responding to societal pressures to act in an environmentally sensitive manner. "Investors believe it is simply not acceptable to be environmentally irresponsible," said Abby Joseph Cohen, chief US investment strategist at Goldman Sachs, which just announced its own comprehensive environmental policy.
Others note that companies can no longer avoid the issue. "Shareholders are pressuring everyone to disclose what they are doing in the environmental arena," said Michael Johnston, executive vice president of Capital Group Cos, a money management firm.
The reasons are as much financial as moral, added Stanley Deutsch, a research analyst at Babson Capital Management. "Pension accounting, legal problems, and, these days, environmental problems, all can be claims on cash flow," he said.
In many cases, of course, sky-rocketing prices of oil and gas have given a boost to clean technologies. Procter and Gamble is substituting vegetable oils for petroleum derivatives in Tide detergent and Head and Shoulders shampoos, and rivals like Colgate and Kimberley Clark are
exploring alternative ingredients as well. Wal-Mart is looking at ways to burn used motor oil and cooking grease as fuel.
Even traditional energy companies are seeing sales of oil substitutes skyrocket. Eastman Gasification Services, a unit of Eastman Chemical Co, helps companies turn coal into a cleaner-burning fuel or raw material. David Denton, director of business development, says that sales are accelerating and that Eastman is now exploring ways to make chemicals from petroleum residues, the substances left when sulfur is removed from oil.
Air Products and Chemicals Inc, based in Allentown, Pennsylvania, has been selling "refinery hydrogen," which is used to remove sulfur from oil, for more than a decade. But now Air Products is building six plants, "as many as we've built at one time in our history," said Scott Sherman, the company's vice president for energy and process industries.
fuel hikes
Mark Gulley, an independent analyst who follows industrial gas companies, is not surprised. "High fuel prices have made refinery hydrogen a hot growth driver," he said.
GE, too, acknowledges that many products included in its much-touted "ecomagination" program were developed to boost energy efficiency. The products are either inherently green (like wind power), 10 percent greener than earlier products (more efficient jet engines), or meet government standards for energy efficiency (new power generators).
Still, the appetite for green energy is growing independently of high oil prices. Many new technologies "are tied less to the cost of energy than to the notion of making the world cleaner," said John Preston, a senior lecturer on entrepreneurship at the MIT Sloan School of Management.
In fact, much of the research into oil-free products predates the oil price spike. Since 2000, DuPont has been slowly replacing petrochemicals with ingredients like corn. Today, about 83 percent of its products use petrochemicals; it expects to drive that below 75 percent by 2010. "We are looking at our entire portfolio to see where we can make substitutions," said Thomas Connelly Jr., chief science and technology officer.
wal-mart to the rescue
Similarly, in 2000, Chevron started Chevron Energy Solutions to promote energy conservation products. "We don't see a correlation between the price of crude and our customers' interest in running green facilities," said James Davis, the unit's president. For example, Davis said that he counted as clients many universities whose electric bills had not increased, but who wanted to tout their "green campus" to prospective students, faculty, and donors.
The flipside -- avoiding negative publicity -- is an equally powerful motivator. CSI Leasing, which leases personal computers, was worried that discarded equipment would end up leaching chemicals into landfills. So last year, Executive Personal Computers, a CSI subsidiary that sells used computers, added a sideline business: collecting used computers from CSI and others, then stripping them into steel, plastic, and other components to sell as scrap.
Still, the biggest boost to green technologies is the goodwill bonus that environmental responsibility can confer. Wal-Mart, under fire for some labor practices and facing resistance to proposed new stores, is rolling out a program, already at 584 stores, to recycle shrink wraps, shopping bags, and other plastic items that once went to landfills.
Wal-Mart also has experimental stores in McKinney, Texas, and Aurora, Colorado, where it is testing the use of trees and grasses, particularly in parking lots, to absorb carbon dioxide emissions and tainted water; wind and solar energy to generate electricity; use of recycled materials for outdoor pavements; formaldehyde-free store flooring; and ways to recycle construction debris.
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
Mirror mirror on the wall, what’s the fairest Disney live-action remake of them all? Wait, mirror. Hold on a second. Maybe choosing from the likes of Alice in Wonderland (2010), Mulan (2020) and The Lion King (2019) isn’t such a good idea. Mirror, on second thought, what’s on Netflix? Even the most devoted fans would have to acknowledge that these have not been the most illustrious illustrations of Disney magic. At their best (Pete’s Dragon? Cinderella?) they breathe life into old classics that could use a little updating. At their worst, well, blue Will Smith. Given the rapacious rate of remakes in modern
RSS