When four Taipei City Government councilors wrongfully accused the Children Are Us Foundation (喜憨兒社會福利基金會) of exploiting its workers with developmental disabilities, at a press conference last month, the group saw its hard-won reputation crumble overnight.
Its offices were flooded with phone calls from concerned citizens demanding to know how their money was spent. Orders for Children Are Us Bakery items from corporations were canceled and donations were withdrawn.
Children Are US was accused by the councilors of paying workers under the minimum wage. But in fact, the group had to provide oversight for its workers and was not making a profit and thereby breaking the terms of its charity charter.
PHOTO: FANG BIN-ZHAO, TAIPEI TIMES
"To a non-profit organization like us, good image and accountability are our core values. Once they are questioned, the very existence of the organization will fall apart," Children Are Us Foundation CEO Wu Ting-fang (
Non-Profit Organizations (NPOs) are usually charity organizations whose primary objective is to support matters of public concern. They don't operate to generate profit. NPOs can been seen as a powerful supplement to government inefficiency and inflex-ibility, in terms of social welfare services and distribution of resources.
In Taiwan, there are tens of thousands of such organizations that are funded by donations from private and public sectors. However, without well-defined regulations and a central body to supervise the operation of groups like Children Are Us, such incidents are likely to happen again. And once the general public loses faith in a group because of misunderstandings about the law and how it is supposed to operate then it will likely collapse and this will obviously impact on the people it was intended to help.
Underpaid or overpaid?
Thankfully, a newly established alliance of local NPOs, the Taiwan NPO Self-Regulation Alliance (台灣公益團體自律聯盟), is setting out some improvements. Founded one year ago by 31 not-for-profit groups such as the Eden Social Welfare Foundation (伊甸社會福利基金會), the Red Cross Society of the ROC (中華民國紅十字會) and United Way of Taiwan (中華社會福利聯合勸募協會), the alliance was officially established two weeks ago and already has over 60 members who have joined together to develop a transparent and accountable mechanism for donating and fund raising.
As Feng Yen (
If only things were that simple.
The only law that regulates NPO operations is the united fund raising regulation which went into effect in 1953. The regulation was intended to limit the government's fund raising efforts for the purpose of entertaining the armed forces. As the country became more wealth in the late 1960s and early 1970s, local NPOs began to thrive and the fund raising regulation was the only law they had to comply with.
The Social Affairs Department of the Ministry of the Interior oversees the application of the fund raising law, but it neither has the resources nor the manpower to supervise such a huge body of social groups.
"If you are a law-abiding group and try to follow the regulations, the agency will keep a close eye on you. But if you don't care about the law and just go fund raising your own way, you will be fine until something goes wrong and then you are on every news channel. Then the agency will pay more attention on you," Feng said.
Such was the situation in the pre-1999 period.
In the spotlight
Six years ago, the 921 earthquake destroyed many people's homes and also brought to light the fact that the fund raising regulations were seriously out of keeping with the times. The disorderly management of relief funds made people start to ask questions about where there donations were going.
A fund raising bill was drafted after the earthquake that aimed to create a better environment for both NPOs and those who make donations. The bill also places restrictions on fund raising campaigns initiated by the government.
But, six years later, the bill still lies under pile at the Legislative Yuan waiting to be passed.
The Taiwan NPO Self-Regulation Alliance, therefore, has come at a good time. It has two objectives: to push through fund raising bill legislation and to promote self-imposed higher standards on NPOs that will ensure transparency and accountability.
Self-reforming
"Apart from the legal regulations, NPOs themselves need to establish a mechanism for the general public to have access to the operations of the organizations. People have the right to know how the money is raised, how it is managed and what the group has done and achieved with the funds," Feng said.
One source of possible abuse by NPOs lies in the fact that many of them shun their duty to make their financial reports public. According to statistics gathered by the Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (
The alliance is urging charity groups to disclose their financial reports and allow public access to information.
Charity begins at home
According to Feng, more than 50 percent of the total amount of annual donations goes to major religious groups, while United Way of Taiwan, the only fundraising organi-zation that distributes funds to smaller NPOs, takes around NT$100 to NT$200 million, of the total NT$42 billion pie.
For small-to-medium-sized organizations, the alliance offers an agency for growth through counseling and exper-ience and information-sharing. Not only can these groups gain legal and financial information and know-how, but they can also become more visible through the alliance's assistance.
"Most of our members to date are small- and medium-size groups. But if we can all live up to these standards and let the public know this is how it should be done, then we can place pressure on major NPOs to fulfill their obligations to be transparent and accountable," Feng said.
As for the general public, the alliance also sets a goal for public education.
"Givers should also be smart consumers. If people know it's their right to find out whether or not their money is used efficiently and sensibly, then NPOs will have to pay more attention to accountability if they want to seek recognition and support," Feng said.
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
President William Lai’s (賴清德) March 13 national security speech marked a turning point. He signaled that the government was finally getting serious about a whole-of-society approach to defending the nation. The presidential office summarized his speech succinctly: “President Lai introduced 17 major strategies to respond to five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces: China’s threat to national sovereignty, its threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting Taiwan’s military, its threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan, its threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges, and its threats from
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
RSS